Remove this Banner Ad

Why?????

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Why the bloody hell did we re-draft Michael ****ing Clark back on to our rookie list?? I thought that after three years we had realised that he was a damn hack, but no, our club is ****ed in the head.

****ing idiots. **** off Clark, you are a hack! :mad: :mad:
 
lol. im HIGHLY amused with your dummy spit adam! :)

but i do agree with you. i honestly dont think he's worth it. he doesnt really deserve a spot on our list, but obviously the people who really count - dont agree with that.

i guess good luck to him, and lets hope he can bloody well do something constructive this season!
 
:eek: u r kidding me. please tell me u r kidding me. WHY DO U MOCK ME!!! Y THE F*** DO U MOCK ME! :mad: that is wrong. i reckon he will be 33 and still on the damn rookie list. that is pathetic. :mad:
 
And we didn't even pick up Chris Blumfield (cousin of justin) in the rookie draft over Michael Clarke. It's disgraceful... Blummers is a champ...
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Originally posted by willydave
And we didn't even pick up Chris Blumfield (cousin of justin) in the rookie draft over Michael Clarke. It's disgraceful... Blummers is a champ...

I'd take a big piece of crap on the rookie list before Michael Clark. I reckon it would be twice the player Clark is.
 
Originally posted by Dee
:eek: u r kidding me. please tell me u r kidding me. WHY DO U MOCK ME!!! Y THE F*** DO U MOCK ME! :mad: that is wrong. i reckon he will be 33 and still on the damn rookie list. that is pathetic. :mad:

wouldnt be suprised! :rolleyes:

dont they have to be either delisted or put up to the senior list after 2 yrs on the rookie list? i guess that means he'll be droped and re-picked up quite a few times in his life!
 
We could have at least put Brad Flower on our rookie list in front of bloody Clark.

Bloody hell I'm ****ed off with this.
 
Originally posted by CowboyFromHell
We could have at least put Brad Flower on our rookie list in front of bloody Clark.

Bloody hell I'm ****ed off with this.

there's a million people who could have picked up before clark! the guys a hack, a dud! unless he just magically finds some skill and becomes a great player, he doesnt deserve a spot on our list! when will they wake up to him?!
 
Hell, put me on the rookie list. I'll wear number 49 and snipe people behind the play!

I'll be doing more than Clark anyway! :D ;)
 
Originally posted by CowboyFromHell
Hell, put me on the rookie list. I'll wear number 49 and snipe people behind the play!

I'll be doing more than Clark anyway! :D ;)

lol. id draft my brother (whos 6) before michael clark!
 
Originally posted by CowboyFromHell


Bloody hell I'm ****ed off with this.

Adam...you sound worked up! What did I tell you back on November 24th mate? Maybe something like our club makes some strange recruiting decisions? Selecting Michael Clark shouldn't have been unexpected - I warned you.

Whatever the case, I hope Michael Clark can do well. The club has put a lot of time into him so far and it's really about time he did something. However, I would've preferred to select another 18 year old in the rookie draft.
 
Originally posted by Supermercado
Maybe they couldn't bear to leave him on 1 game, 1 goal...

Yeah that ain't half bad. Perhaps we wanted to give him a few seasons more on the rookie list, and let him play 20 or so games over the next decade, and his career will read:

20 games (1999-2008), 1 (charity) goal, 3 (shocking) kicks, 1 (ineffective) handball.

Then he would head the list of All Time VFA/VFL/AFL HACKS.
:D :p
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Bring back Wayne Lamb, he was the king of the hacks.

Speaking of ancient players, who's the person on here who is starting a website? Cos I have an up to date list of the all-time MFC games and goals leaders (everybody from Flower and Norm Smith right down to 1 game or 1 goal duds - like erm, Michael Clark!) that you might want to put on there.
 
What a ****ed up decision. Just when I was starting to feel postive about the Club again:mad:
He can get ****ed and Powell can go with him:o :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad:
 
Originally posted by dees01
What a ****ed up decision. Just when I was starting to feel postive about the Club again:mad:
He can get ****ed and Powell can go with him:o :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad:

oohh, you can fit lots of smilies again! :)
 
Originally posted by Somefella
20 games (1999-2008), 1 (charity) goal, 3 (shocking) kicks, 1 (ineffective) handball.

Then he would head the list of All Time VFA/VFL/AFL HACKS.
:D :p

lol... dont joke about it! its BOUND to happen!!
 
We didn't really need to re-draft the dumb prick to prove he is a hack. We know that already.

But, seems the club doesn't. Idiots.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom