Zac Beeck

[Falconer02]

Im from Dunsborough WA ( Home of Zac Beeck) I was wondering when Zac will get a game ?
he could play full forward No doubt would be better than Willo
Been told he can beat Gardiner in the ruck and is a good jump and is quite versitatle?

 

[Sera]

He is on the rookie list so he can't play.

 

[Thrawn666]

Originally posted by Falconer02
Im from Dunsborough WA ( Home of Zac Beeck) I was wondering when Zac will get a game ?
he could play full forward No doubt would be better than Willo
Been told he can beat Gardiner in the ruck and is a good jump and is quite versitatle?

He sounds like quite the player, I wonder if perhaps you might think the statements youre making arent a little outrageous perhaps? if he's as good as you say he is, he should be absolutely dominating the WAFL.....

 

[ozzult]

Re: Re: Zac Beeck

Originally posted by Thrawn666
He sounds like quite the player, I wonder if perhaps you might think the statements youre making arent a little outrageous perhaps? if he's as good as you say he is, he should be absolutely dominating the WAFL.....

That theory doesn't work too well. Even if Cousins went into the WAFL right now, doesn't mean he will get 45 touches.

Beeck pretty much is dominating in the WAFL, he will be the next guy to get promoted off the list I reckon.

 

[GoEagles]

I know the club are very keen on him and kept him on the Rookie List because they see him as a long term prospect (although they said this of Dean Buszan too!).

Right now I'd say Beeck would be ahead of Edwards and Rudeforth on the Rookie List.

 

[Eagle_Fan]

What's his attittude like? His father was telling half of Broome how lazy he is. Real supportive, unless thats reverse psychology.

It'd have to be his last chance by now though.

 

[jod23]

Re: Re: Re: Zac Beeck

Originally posted by ozzult
That theory doesn't work too well. Even if Cousins went into the WAFL right now, doesn't mean he will get 45 touches.

What odds would you get on that? Id back him, he can drum up 35 with a AFL quality tagger on him, so IMO he could easily drum up 45 in the WAFL.

Depending on the odds, I think I would throw some money on that.

 

[ozzult]

Re: Re: Re: Re: Zac Beeck

Originally posted by jod23
What odds would you get on that? Id back him, he can drum up 35 with a AFL quality tagger on him, so IMO he could easily drum up 45 in the WAFL.

Depending on the odds, I think I would throw some money on that.

I don't buy it. I wouldn't expect him to rack up any more than he would in the AFL.

 

[daddy_4_eyes]

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Zac Beeck

Originally posted by ozzult
I don't buy it. I wouldn't expect him to rack up any more than he would in the AFL.

Agreed. With a slower pace he would probably have more time to line up his kicks, but there's only that much ground you can cover to get the ball. Having said that, I imagine he'd have more 30+ possession games in the WAFL than in the AFL.

 

[iceman]

No guarantee he'll be elevated no matter how good he is.... lets not forget Dean Busznan, how good was he supposed to be?? Then he got delisted

 

[Jabber]

Originally posted by iceman
No guarantee he'll be elevated no matter how good he is.... lets not forget Dean Busznan, how good was he supposed to be?? Then he got delisted

I think he's safe. My guess is Willo will be de-listed at the end of this season, and Beeck will be elevated to take his place.