They assisted the ACC in their reportWhen did this happen?
Who did ASADA advise?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They assisted the ACC in their reportWhen did this happen?
Who did ASADA advise?
How is a young, and sometimes immature and uneducated, AFL player supposed to know "not banned" means "but still may be, please proceed to google..?.
They were direct quotes from a lawyer not representing Essendon. To me this trumps Caro and her thorcesActually, they were comments from a journalist about what a lawyer said.
They're not allowed toThey would trust the "WADA complying" professional and legally binding advice of the Essendon Football Club, wouldn't they?
They would trust the professional and legally binding advice of the Essendon Football Club, wouldn't they?
No it's clear that the bombers got it horribly wrong by administering a cocktail of potential life threatening drugs in the pursuit of ultimate gloryRight clear as mud...so clear even the agency ENTRUSTED with overseeing all this got it horribly wrong for a long long time.
trumps, are you serious. This is not about one upmanship.They were direct quotes from a lawyer not representing Essendon. To me this trumps Caro and her thorces
They're not allowed to
This is where is gets ugly for the AFL and I don't think they would want to go there. If (hypothetically) 6 players received a ban I think the AFL will put all sorts of pressure on Essendon to take the hit and put this thing to bed. The AFL would want to avoid overturning any ban put it place by WADA/ASADA and be forever seen as a league that turns a blind eye. Integrity isn't the AFL's main game. It's PR.it it's appealed it's held before a specially convened hearing of the AFL Tribunal appeals board...
So when the player is told they are to receive aod9604 do they jump on google or ring ASaDa?ALL AFL players are given education and talks every season around their legal responsibilities and peds and rec drugs. ALL players are advised it is their responsibilty to check everything they put in their body , down to cold tablets etc. Therefore ALL players who chose for whatever reason to have a susbstance put into their bodies that is outside the code, are liable and will incur penalties.
ANY drug that is not deemed suitable for human use is outside the code period......
Consent forms giving their consent to participate in the programEssendon duped young men in to signing contracts that they believed in good faith?
So why do ASADA ask players to contact them before taking substances? If theyre not going to say "not specifically banned but falls under S0, so therefore still banned" Whats the point?
How is a young, and sometimes immature and uneducated, AFL player supposed to know "not banned" means "but still may be, please proceed to google..?.
Yet this is what we are told because the players can not claim the club made the mistake
ALL AFL players are given education and talks every season around their legal responsibilities and peds and rec drugs. ALL players are advised it is their responsibilty to check everything they put in their body , down to cold tablets etc. Therefore ALL players who chose for whatever reason to have a susbstance put into their bodies that is outside the code, are liable and will incur penalties.
ANY drug that is not deemed suitable for human use is outside the code period......
Integrity isn't the AFL's main game. It's PR.
IF they exist, then it is corporate systemic intimidation of staff....or they were fully informed, and all called as they were advised by the afl to do under the anti doping code?Essendon duped young men in to signing contracts that they believed in good faith?
So I'm on you're banned list or am I prohibited?Just for your information, your queer infatuation with me has forced me to place you on ignore. Have a nice day
So why do ASADA ask players to contact them before taking substances? If theyre not going to say "not specifically banned but falls under S0, so therefore still banned" Whats the point?
How is a young, and sometimes immature and uneducated, AFL player supposed to know "not banned" means "but still may be, please proceed to google..?.
Yet this is what we are told because the players can not claim the club made the mistake
as per their direction by the afl they ring the 24 hr player sepcific number they are all given...So when the player is told they are to receive aod9604 do they jump on google or ring ASaDa?
Hmmmmm
The letter the media postulated? You fell for that one too right?They are educated time and time again, if you are unsure, don't take it. This sympathy for stupid footballers defence is pathetic.
You're club instigated a comprehensive supplements program and it appears they $&@?ed it up and turned it into a doping program.
If that is what happened, players will pay the price, the EFC will pay the price, and then the EFC will pay the price again when the player sue them and sponsors jump ship.
Is there any chance the EFC are at fault here? Today it is ASADA's fault? Last week it was the doctors. before that it was Dank went all rogue (which could be true but given he was employed by the club is irrelevant)
It is probably time to mobilise your 50k deluded members to find that letter.
So when the player is told they are to receive aod9604 do they jump on google or ring ASaDa?
Which is?as per their direction by the afl they ring the 24 hr player sepcific number they are all given...
As odd as the fact you think we would know?Is there any evidence that they did either?
That is odd.
So when the player is told they are to receive aod9604 do they jump on google or ring ASaDa?
Hmmmmm
The letter the media postulated? You fell for that one too right?
Players responsibility to check. Who with? ASADA!