Armchair Critic
Cancelled
- Feb 8, 2013
- 9,566
- 11,241
- AFL Club
- Sydney
Photo of said event?
It was video footage , Melbcycle posted it on twiiter , I am not searching for it
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Round 13
The Golden Ticket - MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
EUFA EURO 2024 - Group Stage ⚽ EPL 24/25 starts Aug 17
Photo of said event?
Who knows, they want ot know what may happen to their club, and give advice if then can I guessOn what grounds did essendon ask to be there?
Really?Actually no
Danks main job was with efc
Charter and Alavi understood he was purchasing for efc
There is therefore a reasonable chance that was where tb4 ended up, especially with Thymosin on the consent form
If dank sent the supps elsewhere, the players need to prove it
I'm not saying it didn't end up at EFC, but not so sure your bolded part is true.Mr Charter has previously said Mr Dank asked him to buy banned peptide Thymosin beta-4, but said he didn't know which of Mr Dank's clients were going to use it.
Mr Charter said he did not know what happened to the peptide after it went to Mr Alavi and could not say if it was injected into Essendon players.
Bit of a nut job.Cerberus
So, none?It was video footage , Melbcycle posted it on twiiter , I am not searching for it
So, none?
Charter and Alavi understood he was purchasing for efc
I stand corrected, which one is he?Just for you
Melbourne Cycle @melbcycle · Sep 22
Channel 9 Melbourne's coverage of Federal count decision http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-l2qo6RXKaY… << Great footage of @tretestecane's dismay at result
I stand corrected, which one is he?
I don't agree with that one.
Charter make a comment on where it might have gone after Alavi the other day (not that I would trust Charter anyway)
Pretty sure ASAD still have to prove it went to Essendon.
Both Alavi and Charter have claim they did not know the Essendon program iirc/
Why didn't essendon keep records of what they were pumping into players?
Fair enough.Pretty sure he is the young one in the grey suit
If they weren't guilty they've sure been acting like it for the last 2 years.I am selective, I am biased and I do want ASADA to win.It's not because I hate Essendon, it's not because I hate Hird and it's definitely not because I am a vindictive campaigner (I admit I can be a campaigner sometimes), it's because they are Guilty of doping their players and deserve everything that comes their way.
You are not the only person who speaks to experts
Bit of a nut job.
The guy who looks to be suffering a sudden bout of hay fever?Pretty sure he is the young one in the grey suit
The guy who looks to be suffering a sudden bout of hay fever?
Seriously GeeGee, this is equivalent to stating that the stuff the street drug dealer gave to you couldn't possibly have been heroin, because he sells heroin to other people.
There are several reasons why they would not;
1. Incompetence
2. Hiding something
3. Protecting IP.
Evicted from the GG name like a footy club being evicted by a bowls club.Hang on - so GG is who now ?
Is he now Gigantor ?
You're claiming they bought stuff from the Coca-Cola dealer, who only ever sells Coca-Cola and Coca-Cola products, who only ever buys from a distributor that has stated he has only ever supplied the dealer with Coca-Cola. And you're claiming it could be Pepsi.
Armchair Critic
I could argue jst as validly reason some may say ASADA's case is 'weak'
The issuing o 34 SCN to some lawyers was a hint at some weakness in their case. That there is something missing in their intel in getting tb4 from China, to Alavi to Dank to the player.
They would be more concerned if there were less players facing charges that they had nailed every step in the process. Maybe ASADA have nailed it down to each players. but IO think it is a valid thought.
If Essendon or the players thought they were screwed, why not take a cosy deal? 4 weeks and be gone/
Why continual delay handing over your breifs on why you believe they players are guilty.
Or, hat ASDA taking 3 days in their opening could be a hint at weakness. Fill up the first 3 days until the break, allow them more time until next year to keep investigation. Give time for players to sweat and hope they come running for a deal etc etc etc.
They could be all a lod of shit. BUt I think there are some fair assessments there, depending what you want to
I find that just as valid as why would ASADA issue the SCN if they weren't confident - I think that is a fair call, but there are retorts to it, as well as everything I posted.
Dank is meticulous in recording things. This is known from his prior work. If Essendon doesn't have records, Dank almost certainly does. Why does he not want to admit he has records? This is the big question.There are several reasons why they would not;
1. Incompetence
2. Hiding something
3. Protecting IP.