And yet Teague with the same issues smashed itTo be fair, Bolton was hamstrung by SOS’s shit player selections and list management.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Collingwood v Melbourne - 3:20PM Mon
Squiggle tips Pies at 52% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
EUFA EURO 2024 - Group Stage ⚽ EPL 24/25 starts Aug 17
And yet Teague with the same issues smashed itTo be fair, Bolton was hamstrung by SOS’s shit player selections and list management.
Looks good on the CV I bet!Oh fu**
Another one who went on a 2 week course at Harvard and pretends he has a Harvard education
I don't really see the issue with this myself.He was right. That picture from the Essendon coaching box during this year epitomises the ridiculousness that AFL has become.
View attachment 777252
I have heard that Kelly is not a fan of Fagan or the Crows due to dealings he has had while at the SANFL. I don't know if it would affect his desire to accept the position if he was interested.Adam Kelly’s an interesting one,very different background to Burton and sounds like he’d be brought in to counter Fagan’s perceived lack of football background. More a corporate style with a good understanding of football, rather than your footballer who has an understanding of the corporate.
He very much seems like one you’d bring on as a potential to take on the CEO role in time.
Interesting to combine with Jars rumour of Vozzo being a year away.Are Fagan’s days numbered and we’re creating a succession plan? Kelly for 1 year as football ops with Fagan CEO, then Fagan departs(there were rumours a year or so ago that he’d be gone, or had other plans), Kelly takes over as CEO and Vozzo takes over football ops?
Footy is not that hard. They’ve just made it complicated to justify the ridiculous money being spent on it.I don't really see the issue with this myself.
The sport has grown a hell of a lot from the 'old school'days where you have an entire team to support assistant coaches and the head coach to try push the message out. Not sure what's so ridiculous about it.
Are we getting a Head of Footy?
Maybe in another 4 weeks time we will hear Nicks doesnt want one of those as well
Except for those pesky board minutes Caro claimed (in the national press) to have seen
If that was true, we'd see teams cutting their numbers in half, especially given the cap restrictions.Footy is not that hard. They’ve just made it complicated to justify the ridiculous money being spent on it.
Roo might give himself the job, just about running the club as it isThe club won’t announce and explain it though. Ricciuto will just mumble something about it in passing on his breakfast radio show.
Roo might give himself the job, just about ruining the club as it is
To be fair Bolton was hamstrung by no clear game plan.To be fair, Bolton was hamstrung by SOS’s shit player selections and list management.
Some teams are going with less coaches these days though, not all clubs have senior assistants. Of course the stock standard mid/forward/ruck/forward coaches will be around, and then others who deal with things outside of match day (eg development coaches), but there’s no need to have more than 5 in a coaching box on game day (excluding the one or two stats people).If that was true, we'd see teams cutting their numbers in half, especially given the cap restrictions.
I think you'll find there's a few more than one or two stat people. Whilst their job mightn't seem that important compared to the assistant coaches, they're still apart of the cog that works towards that same goal. They'll be feeding line coaches with data they require, compiling footage to either provide to those coaches during the game or to the players during quarter breaks etc.Some teams are going with less coaches these days though, not all clubs have senior assistants. Of course the stock standard mid/forward/ruck/forward coaches will be around, and then others who deal with things outside of match day (eg development coaches), but there’s no need to have more than 5 in a coaching box on game day (excluding the one or two stats people).
7 in a data analyst role does seem excessive though. 5 coaches seems pretty standard based on the post in the other thread.I think you'll find there's a few more than one or two stat people. Whilst their job mightn't seem that important compared to the assistant coaches, they're still apart of the cog that works towards that same goal. They'll be feeding line coaches with data they require, compiling footage to either provide to those coaches during the game or to the players during quarter breaks etc.
There was an article online earlier in the year which had a pic of who Collingwood had in the box - https://www.collingwoodfc.com.au/news/2019-07-12/explainer-whos-that-in-the-coaches-box
In this case you've got 6 coaches, 7 that are in an analyst/data kind of role (plus an intern) along with whatever category you want to put a game intelligence manager (oppo scout?).
I can't help but imagine most big clubs are going to have a similar number instead of this 6-7 number you're suggesting.
Oh no, we will need to revert to the coach presenting our jumpers...Are we waiting to announce after the draft?
And yet Teague with the same issues smashed it
For me its not if thats the concern ( I think there will be an appointment) its who and why the who?Looks like the senior coaching assistant we’re going to dispense with for soft cap expediency
Wonder if this makes a new footy ops manager more or less likely to be appointed?
We will find out earlyDead cat bounce
Let’s see him with a full season and expectations.
For me its not if thats the concern ( I think there will be an appointment) its who and why the who?
( oh and its not John Who )
Are we getting a Head of Footy?
Maybe in another 4 weeks time we will hear Nicks doesnt want one of those as well