Danoz
Dananananananana Statman (òÓ,)_\,,/
If the bombers finish last, how can getting the first pick be justified by the afl?Agree with most of this, will just add a couple of things. Essendon did cooperate early. There were none of the antics that cronulla pulled (ie. Refusing to answer questions thanks to their legal counsel - advising them not to self incriminate - which forced asada to call off interviews for some months). Of course this lack of counsel to essendon players is why we saw the lawsuit to try to get the evidence disallowed because they had incriminated themselves (ie. They told the truth). It was only once they realised that asada wasn't going to play nice, that they started the stalling tactics.
I can't see players getting less than 12 months backdated to date of issuing INs.
I'm doubtful the afl will penalise essendon a second time (they will claim they have already punished them).