Yeah I understand the logic behind this but I'm not certain he does enough around the ground, or wins enough clean hit outs for increased ruck minutes to be such an advantage for him. I think Tippett's best shot at scoring well is to clunk marks and kick as many goals as possible. He's never been a high possession winner regardless of what role he is playing, so as best as I can figure, goals are his SC meal ticket. Hope for your sake that I am a buffoon. It has been suggested more than once in my life.
He certainly played better football last season when he spent more time in the ruck. Seems to gain confidence from contributing around the action rather than getting frost-bitten (and occasionally lost) in the forward 50. 70/30 split (fwd/ruck) would be what I would be aiming for if I was his coach. But alas, they don't often let buffoons coach...
...except maybe this bloke...
You are right, he probably needs to score 3 plus goals to post a good score and he will put in the occasional shocker so it is a big risk. However, I thought in the back half of 2015 he actually got used to the role more and it was the ground level work he did at the stoppage which stood out for me. Even when he looked like losing a hit out he would neutralise the ball enough to force it straight down to compete for the ground level ball. He did it pretty well against Sandilands in last years QF.
Our first 8 games are Pies (H), Carlton (A) , GWS (H) , Crows (A) , Eagles (H) , Lions (A) and Essendon (H), Richmond(A) . He probably wont win any hit out counts but I can see him getting 15-20 touches and kicking 2-3 each game.
Personally I would prefer him up anchored up forward and playing two specialist ruckmen in his place ( which makes me a buffoon too ), but the coaching staff want to use his mobility.
Don't worry, Im bullish now but come late March my sphincter will have tightened tenfold