No, the issue is you want to turn EVERY discussion into attacks on keeping Sloane.
If I'm honest, I just find it boring.
You started this wanting to talk about whether we have enough list spots. But it seems you really just wanted to talk again about not cutting Sloane.
FFS, at this point I think you need to get over it. He's staying. I wouldn't have done it - but I can understand why people do things different to me.
You're trying to find reasons why keeping Sloane is wrong. But this isn't one of them because, with him on the list, we still have the list spots for them to do what they want.
I'm having trouble reconciling the above post with the below where you're bemoaning using a rookie spot on Borlase because it'll cost us an opportunity to take one of the remaining, "good talents".
Honestly, I'm annoyed we've guaranteed him a rookie spot.
With only 55 or so main list picks, there will be good talents who are unselected and available as rookies. But we'll have no ability to take them because we've committed to Borlase, someone who's not going to be no more than a middling backup.
.