- Banned
- #1
Just tuned in for a bit of the prematch before Port vs Hawthorn. In time for a segment about a HFC trip down to Cerberus for some military-style training.
Cut to a montage of Hawthorn players working hard on an obstacle course, some clips from apparent Navy trainers (one guy, one girl) explaining the teamwork/camaraderie ethos these drills are intended to build, before finishing with none other than Josh Gibson glowing about the Navy, saying: 'if I was kicked out of footy I would come sign up here'. defencejobs.gov overlaying the last part of the segment.
Now this is blatant pro-military advertising (or, as it used to be known, propaganda). At a time when young peoples safety net is on the verge of being kyboshed, youth unemployment is one the rise, and some argue we are on the precipice of escalating worldwide conflicts.
Are you personally comfortable with the top administrator of the sport we all love having this kind of relationship with the defence force and its recruiting drives? If so, can you at least see why other people might not be? If not, would you be willing to join some kind of campaign against it or is yours more of a passive objection?
Over to you, bigfooty.
Cut to a montage of Hawthorn players working hard on an obstacle course, some clips from apparent Navy trainers (one guy, one girl) explaining the teamwork/camaraderie ethos these drills are intended to build, before finishing with none other than Josh Gibson glowing about the Navy, saying: 'if I was kicked out of footy I would come sign up here'. defencejobs.gov overlaying the last part of the segment.
Now this is blatant pro-military advertising (or, as it used to be known, propaganda). At a time when young peoples safety net is on the verge of being kyboshed, youth unemployment is one the rise, and some argue we are on the precipice of escalating worldwide conflicts.
Are you personally comfortable with the top administrator of the sport we all love having this kind of relationship with the defence force and its recruiting drives? If so, can you at least see why other people might not be? If not, would you be willing to join some kind of campaign against it or is yours more of a passive objection?
Over to you, bigfooty.