- Aug 6, 2013
- 3,267
- 2,688
- AFL Club
- Essendon
Hill is easily better than Sidebottom.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Round 10
The Golden Ticket - MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
Hill is easily better than Sidebottom.
+1, it is a win win for both clubs.
Brisbane needed an ultra consistent h&a gun who doesn't step up in big games because, lets be honest here, Brisbane aren't going to be playing in any in the foreseeable future. Collingwood, on the other hand, needed big and accountable midfielders who don't get dominated by the best midfielders in the AFL - in the immediacy we have Crisp who is probably top 3 in our best and fairest; long term we have him and De Goey who is already best 22 on our list. The proof is in the pudding, in spite of losing our second best midfielder our midfield is stronger in 2015 and results against the top teams this season have significantly improved. Likewise, Beams will help Brisbane beat teams like Carlton and get them off dead bottom on the ladder to a very respectable bottom on percentage.
As Michael Scott says - win, win, win.
hill is overated.Sidebottom is nowhere near as good as Hill.
Yep we didn't beat them but, unlike last season, we got very close and showed significant improvements with what is still a very young list.What top teams have you actually beat? None?
Won against, Brisbane, Carlton, Saints, Essendon, Gold Coast, North, Melbourne and GWS. With the GWS the only top 8 side you've beat. You've lost the last three games. You've had a seriously easy fixture.
I'm happy with our last 3 weeks against 3 top sides. Especially considering the player's we've had out, 10 kids running around with under 50 games experience and no key forward.
we have the youngest team in the comp for about 70% of matches this year and the second youngest list all up only ahead of GWSYep we didn't beat them but, unlike last season, we got very close and showed significant improvements with what is still a very young list.
It's interesting that you bring up how well you think your side as performing in spite of sitting dead last on the ladder because you had 10 kids running around with under 50 games of experience. By my count we had 10 players with 50 games or under when we nearly beat Hawthorn 2 weeks ago and I'd say that that level of experience has been constant for us most games this season. We sit firmly in the 8 and will most likely play finals whereas the only thing you've got a chance of winning is a priority pick.
Without straying too far off topic, lack of experience is not an excuse for your club miserable results. Instead of wallowing in excuses self pity your energy would be better used seeking an explanation for your clubs failure to be competitive this last decade.
Yep we didn't beat them but, unlike last season, we got very close and showed significant improvements with what is still a very young list.
It's interesting that you bring up how well you think your side as performing in spite of sitting dead last on the ladder because you had 10 kids running around with under 50 games of experience. By my count we had 10 players with 50 games or under when we nearly beat Hawthorn 2 weeks ago and I'd say that that level of experience has been constant for us most games this season. We sit firmly in the 8 and will most likely play finals whereas the only thing you've got a chance of winning is a priority pick.
Without straying too far off topic, lack of experience is not an excuse for your club miserable results. Instead of wallowing in excuses self pity your energy would be better used seeking an explanation for your clubs failure to be competitive this last decade.
your right this thread is chaotic should probably be lockedWTF does this have to do with the 2008 draft?
your right this thread is chaotic should probably be locked
yes but then this thread would be emptyOr we could just leave the dick measuring contests to another thread....
That is actually a ripper list even before Beams. In fact, I rate Martin as better than several players listed in the poll.Anyway, happy with the overall 2008 draft results for us. Rockliff, Beams, Redden, Rich, Stefan Martin and Robinson.
well from that year all the way untill 2013 you can safley say we F@#$ED upThat is actually a ripper list even before Beams. In fact, I rate Martin as better than several players listed in the poll.
That list is near as good as many of the drafts that have been synonymous with premiership success - i.e. Geelong's 2001 draft and Collingwood's 2006 draft. I guess it really begs the question as to what Brisbane's recruiters were doing all those other years
That is actually a ripper list even before Beams. In fact, I rate Martin as better than several players listed in the poll.
That list is near as good as many of the drafts that have been synonymous with premiership success - i.e. Geelong's 2001 draft and Collingwood's 2006 draft. I guess it really begs the question as to what Brisbane's recruiters were doing all those other years
Would take Hannebery and Beams before either.Hurley is a superstar KPD and Nic Nat is a superstar Ruck, These 2 1st and 2nd for me.
Im hoping he was talking about the top ten picks.Would take Hannebery and Beams before either.
Would take Hannebery and Beams before either.
Why? Hurley isn't an improvement on either of our 2 first choice KPD.Well if you did take those 2 before the other 2 for Freo, Your supporters would be displeased.
Why? Hurley isn't an improvement on either of our 2 first choice KPD.