- Jun 28, 2013
- 31,854
- 48,116
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
Underrated post from 2017He's so good, he'll probably become the first Blake Hardwick.
Lots of kids out there who'll probably be touted as the next Blake Hardwick however.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Underrated post from 2017He's so good, he'll probably become the first Blake Hardwick.
Lots of kids out there who'll probably be touted as the next Blake Hardwick however.
Weird opinion but I actually hope he doesn't get any better.
As far as I'm concerned he's already the best in the league for what he does. Like Stratton before him, he's criminally underrated even by many of our own supporters.
If he gets any better then it will be impossible to keep his importance and value under the radar and then we might have to start countering lucrative offers to pry him out.
I'm sure he was at the top of the list of players to call for Clarko once he got the North job.
If only Buddy was a tad shitterYeah I think you’ll be in a minority with your ‘I hope our players stagnate to make retention easier’ standpoint - but kudos on a bold take.
What are tads?
So how do you s**t them?Half a smidgen.
"Shitter" is just poor grammar from threesixpioSo how do you s**t them?
Maybe I should have asked what is a tad shitter?
"Shitter" is just poor grammar from threesixpio
The comparative of the adjective 's**t' is obviously 'shittier', while the superlative is 'shittiest'
Shitter is most inferred as a noun of agency in his example. i.e. object that shits.
It grieves me to see such grammatical standards slipping on this forum.
s**t never use to. Not sure why that's changed.Amusing that s**t cops a swear filter but the extensions of s**t do not.
What I should have said is I don’t care if he improves. He’s already the best player in the league for what he does imo. Just quietly gets it done each week for us.Yeah I think you’ll be in a minority with your ‘I hope our players stagnate to make retention easier’ standpoint - but kudos on a bold take.
AS it does for me. Which is why I chose to read it as a person who sh!ts tads - a tad shitter."Shitter" is just poor grammar from threesixpio
The comparative of the adjective 's**t' is obviously 'shittier', while the superlative is 'shittiest'
Shitter is most inferred as a noun of agency in his example. i.e. object that shits.
It grieves me to see such grammatical standards slipping on this forum.
Wish the swear filter had an opt-out feature on the client side. Makes reading melts far more satisfying.s**t never use to. Not sure why that's changed.
Agreed although, one could argue, that shittier and shittiest are comparative and superlative respectively to shitty."Shitter" is just poor grammar from threesixpio
The comparative of the adjective 's**t' is obviously 'shittier', while the superlative is 'shittiest'
Shitter is most inferred as a noun of agency in his example. i.e. object that shits.
It grieves me to see such grammatical standards slipping on this forum.
eldorado should be chucked in the shittier shitter - not the nice and less s**t one"Shitter" is just poor grammar from threesixpio
The comparative of the adjective 's**t' is obviously 'shittier', while the superlative is 'shittiest'
Shitter is most inferred as a noun of agency in his example. i.e. object that shits.
It grieves me to see such grammatical standards slipping on this forum.
It’s because eldorado placed a correct conjugation filter over the swear filterAmusing that s**t cops a swear filter but the extensions of s**t do not.
From watching all the club behind the scene videos over the years he's always come across as a down to earth really good bloke.
On SM-S906E using BigFooty.com mobile app
Weightman is Hardwicks gimp.Cody Weightman has been kept scoreless twice this year, both times against Hawks.
Wow no wonder he ran into and bounced off Duke like a zombie, Hardwick has frozen his mind.Weightman is Hardwicks gimp.
2023
Round 22: 5 Disposals, 0 Goals, 2 inside 50's
Round 7: 3 Disposals, 0 Goals, 1 inside 50
2022
Round 7: 11 Disposals, 1 Goal, 1 inside 50
Round 15: 1 Disposals, 0 Goals, 0 inside 50
We have a funny way of presenting such team first success that the individual brilliance of player gets thrown into said big pot. Never mad about it though, because it’s always about the team and if anything helps not over inflate our cap. Hardwick is the best small forward defender in the game tho, but his not flashy.I'm not surprised Hawk players don't get talked about more in AA conversations unless they are absolutely obvious choices (and even then they leave out Siciily). Watched 'First Crack' yesterday and only part of Hawthorn's win was Newcombe's performance... like they have done with only talking about Sicily in some wins. No talk about Hardwick again beating a star opponent, or Reeves beating English (again), Amon ripping up the wing (again), etc. etc.