Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I've been in the Get Dixon For First Rounder camp since the idea was floated, but I've changing my thinking.
Assuming that this season is an anomaly in regards to our ladder position, we're not going to get this high a draft pick for a while so it needs to be spent wisely.
Yep. We're also lucky that the AFL have opened up future pick trading at this critical time. We have a chance to get a top 10 pick in to really top off our young group of Polec, Wingard and Wines. We need to take that. What we do with next year's picks is far less critical. I'd absolutely be hoping we can give up next year's 1st pick for Dixon with just a little extra value as it'd suit our list development perfectly.I've been in the Get Dixon For First Rounder camp since the idea was floated, but I've changing my thinking.
Assuming that this season is an anomaly in regards to our ladder position, we're not going to get this high a draft pick for a while so it needs to be spent wisely.
Pick 10 for Dixon and 22, then use 22 to trade for Redden from Brisbane.
Clurey is a developing play that has only played a handful of games, his value atm would be no moor than Moore's. Port would be foolish to trade Clurey, he is not going any where. I do get what you are saying though.
Defensive tactic so their fans go "ah well, he's got s**t ankles anyway".
Why would we? This years draft pool is apparently poor and next years is much better by all accounts so why would we?I was initially in the camp that this years first rounder was the only way to get Dixon, but damn if we could get him for next years first rounder, we'd be ******* dreaming. Would GCS fall for it though?
Why would we? This years draft pool is apparently poor and next years is much better by all accounts so why would we?
#confidence#Because nearly every year we hear "next year's draft is going to be better" and pick 10 will pretty much always be better than pick 18 in the following draft
They are going to have three picks in the top 25 this year as it is. Getting next years pick may actually be more worthwhile for them, there is no guarantee that we rise up the ladder next year and that's how I would sell it. We are losing Schulz, polec a year out of the game, no Schulz and Kane mean we drop the median age a little. Only Brisbane and Carlton you would think are guaranteed to stay at the bottom. With most teams very optimistic of a rise up the ladder including gold coast why can't we sell our first pick next year for Charlie?I was initially in the camp that this years first rounder was the only way to get Dixon, but damn if we could get him for next years first rounder, we'd be ******* dreaming. Would GCS fall for it though?
Why would we? This years draft pool is apparently poor and next years is much better by all accounts so why would we?
They are going to have three picks in the top 25 this year as it is. Getting next years pick may actually be more worthwhile for them, there is no guarantee that we rise up the ladder next year and that's how I would sell it. We are losing Schulz, polec a year out of the game, no Schulz and Kane mean we drop the median age a little. Only Brisbane and Carlton you would think are guaranteed to stay at the bottom. With most teams very optimistic of a rise up the ladder including gold coast why can't we sell our first pick next year for Charlie?
The stuff people write on public forums about clubs 'falling for it' lol.No, I agree, I think we can, I just wonder whether GCS will fall for it, are they that dumb? I hope so. But yeah, there is a definite selling angle and that's how I'd be selling it too... act like we're in a rut and next year is looking uncertain for us again and maybe we'll fall even further? Then we finish in the eight next year and don't really lose all too much while still getting this years first rounder. That's the ideal situation imo.
IMO his performance with the Power was good, i think Ken was trying to get a more mobile defense set up, could be why he was dropped.Agreed re Clurey, he probably isn't going anywhere, I put his name up for a couple of reasons, eg he loses his man too easily ( even at sanfl level, Alleway and Eddy in consecutive weeks ), which may be the reason he was dropped from the Power in the first place, and it could be argued that both of Austin and Howard, who are both taller ( Howard significantly so ) than him, and both have, ( again arguably ) shown more at the same stage of their careers.
Tommy spent a fair slice of his 1st year on the Power list in the gay bay magoos, the other two blokes have looked very comfortable at sanfl leauge level from day 1.
We paid overs for Ryder, don't want to pay overs for Dixon. Keep the first rounder