What?He wasa good ruck at GC.
Too immobile now though
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What?He wasa good ruck at GC.
Too immobile now though
The full context of the commemt from Hinkers is that he's not surprised he did OK in ruck because he thinks if we hadn't developed him as an AA forward that he could've been an elite ruckman instead.
"I actually think Jacko could be an elite ruckman" Ken Hinkley"I actually think Charlie could be an elite ruckman" Ken Hinkley.
Sorry I don't see it.
And I don't think Ken sees it either given he had preferred to play Lycett, Finlayson, Hayes and even SPP in the ruck to Dixon this year alone.
Never elite, but as a chop out for 25% to 30% of the time he provides a completely different (and effective) dynamic that could play havoc with teams.not elite but he gives us a lot when he's on the ball grabbing it out the ruck.
Didn't Dixon only agree to come here after being promised that he wouldn't be used as a ruckman?
"I actually think Charlie could be an elite ruckman" Ken Hinkley.
Sorry I don't see it.
And I don't think Ken sees it either given he had preferred to play Lycett, Finlayson, Hayes and even SPP in the ruck to Dixon this year alone.
I think he's a great second ruck. Now the issue is I have forgotten what a ruck is anymore