- Aug 21, 2008
- 5,928
- 11,425
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Thread starter
- #1,876
Wonder what would have happened if Perez actually took out Max at turn 1.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
A whole lot of laughter I'd imagine.Wonder what would have happened if Perez actually took out Max at turn 1.
He bottled the start and couldnt make any ground he would have come out behind perez and stayed back in 6th without the SC, the fact mclarens race pace with the upgrades on it was the quickest car proves this should have been another bottle job that was saved by a timely safety car.
On the flip side of the team, Gutting race for our boy oscar who drove brilliantly on the mediums and should have at least got a podium out of it. To come away with no points to another Sainz * up and an untimely SC is a little depressing I just hope Ferrari and Red Bull aren't getting a nice upgrade for imola so he can get a race or 2 with what seems like the fastest car on the grid atm.
I do wonder how much of McLarens pace was track specific (Miami had a lot of high speed corners which suits them).
Imola and Monaco will be interesting, particularly with whatever upgrades Ferrari bring to the table.
Great, just need Ferrari to bring something good to Imola and we may for the first time in 3 years have a battle at the front.Will Joseph said post-race that the upgrade package should suit other tracks a lot better than it suited Miami.
Great, just need Ferrari to bring something good to Imola and we may for the first time in 3 years have a battle at the front.
Yep, having 5 drivers in the battle for wins would be great.
Checco is the wildcard.
"Carlos Sainz....congratulations on finishing 3rd today in the Miami GP. We heard during the race that you signed a new deal to line up alongside Max Verstappen at RBR for 2025, how are you feeling?"Wonder what would have happened if Perez actually took out Max at turn 1.
spot on!He bottled the start and couldnt make any ground he would have come out behind perez and stayed back in 6th without the SC, the fact mclarens race pace with the upgrades on it was the quickest car proves this should have been another bottle job that was saved by a timely safety car.
On the flip side of the team, Gutting race for our boy oscar who drove brilliantly on the mediums and should have at least got a podium out of it. To come away with no points to another Sainz * up and an untimely SC is a little depressing I just hope Ferrari and Red Bull aren't getting a nice upgrade for imola so he can get a race or 2 with what seems like the fastest car on the grid atm.
Yeah he was unlucky with that, got lucky with the SC. Wouldn't say it completely balances out but in F1 with no closed pits, s**t happens.I don't agree that Lando bottled the start. He was just on the wrong side of the track and got held up by Checo and the 2 Ferrari's having to slow because of Checo into turn one whereas Oscar had a clean line up the inside.
If you look at F1.com's data analysis (using AWS etc etc), RBR was behind McLaren in pace but Max was Max and got pole, was comfortably leading apart from his error and the SC.I'm not confident on calling it a three way fight just yet as I think this was a bit of an aberration with the safety car. Reminds me of Ricciardo's last win where it turned out it was the exception rather than the norm.
Imola might be a better indicator of both Ferrari and McLaren.
However, anything that means Red Bull and Max actually have to work for it every once in a while is always good for the sport. And yes, I said the same thing during the Mercedes Hamilton years.
it would hasten his exit from r.b.Wonder what would have happened if Perez actually took out Max at turn 1.
FIA: "I'll show them track limits"
What was your lap time?
Nice! Pics 1 & 3 were where I sat for the 2017 race weekend