Well your post makes no sense then? Why are you complaining how many father sons the cats have?My post which you replied to makes no such implication, and as happens on threads it is part of a discussion which contains my previous quoted post.
Geelong can have a team full of father and sons: I don't suggest they shouldn't. Having access to those players is a massive advantage and doesn't require an additional subsidy. Like any draft pick they are hit and miss. That's irrelevant because it is a feature of the draft.
No where do I suggest or imply removing it. That's your drum to beat. I suggest solutions to the imbalance in the AFLs system, which clearly imply keeping it.
The post in itself makes the implication that you would not like the cats to have that many father sons and the only way for that is to change the rules
If that was never your intention then there is no need to bring up how many father sons the cats have?
There is no logical reason following that specific post to assume that you don't want the rule changed
I'll reason in that I didn't read your earlier posts but that post in a vacuum specifically implies that you don't want the cats to have that many father sons, hence needing the rule to be changed