Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Who honestly gives a rats if we are a “laughing stock”? We do things our own way and more often than not it is successful.What the F%&k would we want to get Goldstein... 35 going on to 36... We would be a laughing stock if we take him.. Give me anyone besides a 36 year old Goldstein
I don't think he's that good/I'm not confident he is that good. He's a chance to make it but nowhere near as confident as someone like Sanders.Honestly wouldnt mind us just biting the bullet with stevens at pick 8 if we rate him internally as high as somd carry on in here... I dont care about the general draft vibe, all that matters is your own interal ratings. If he is that good then take him
We don’t need a ruckman for 3 years or more. We need 2 at most at which point Loch Ness Conway should be ready.Play Goldstein for 1 year makes no sense at all...
Stanley will retire next year, Goldstein will also.
We need a guy 30 years or younger that can play for a minimum of 3 years at our club, as the end of next year , we will technically only have 1 ruck..
We asked him 4 years back, and he said no... so let's look for someone else
Guys his 36 next year... not 26..... 36...
Come on everyone, getting Goldstein is 100 steps going backwards
Not necessarily.Having Goldstein and Conway in the 2nds WILL hinder Conway's development by reducing his game time.
I dont get the angst. Its a Player Trading, Drafting FA, Rumours and Wish lists. thread. If someone pass on info they have heard... then thanks and we have something to talk about. You dont bet the weeks food money on anything you read here , someone adds some discussion points it should applauded. I enjoyed it when JJack posted his and same with yours.. If it doesn't work out ...So what?
As shown by Hopper last year ... even info thats correct when posted... can be wrong eventually.
Who honestly gives a rats if we are a “laughing stock”? We do things our own way and more often than not it is successful.
Re: Goldstein, he fits our needs perfectly. We need a back up ruckman, and the 2 most important things about the backup ruck role are:
1. Durability
2. Availability
They don’t need to be a world beater, if they were they wouldn’t be a back up.
Goldstein has always been durable, and he won’t clog up our ruck spot for 4 years. He is probably the best back up ruck for our particular situation out of any of the candidates.
Need Wells and co to stop the fixation with outside players and focus on an inside bull midfielder at the draft.
When was the last inside A grade inside mid recruited at the draft and not traded in/out? Selwood?
So we now have a mystery mid and a mystery ruck. Has anyone heard about a mystery defender? Or mystery winger?Sort of my point and maybe I didn’t make it well.
No one cares if it’s right or wrong. We’re only posting what we hear. The last thing we want is people not posting for fear of persecution.
Just to be clear (even though they’ve missed the point) … I personally don’t care if people post - but then retract or back pedal when other info comes to hand. My comments about ‘mystery mid’ were not a dig at the poster specifically. It was more a reference to the throwaway term which we’d all referenced as a bit of a nod to all the rumours and stories floating around.
People get too easily offended. And too quick to take something personally. I’ve got a prosthetic leg and people call me stumpy …. Do I get offended - no. I learnt a long time ago not to take anything too seriously.
Anyway, I’ve gotta hop along and get stuff done. Heard a rumour about a mystery ruckman I need to chase up.
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
My point exactlyI dont get the angst. Its a Player Trading, Drafting FA, Rumours and Wish lists. thread. If someone pass on info they have heard... then thanks and we have something to talk about. You dont bet the weeks food money on anything you read here , someone adds some discussion points it should applauded. I enjoyed it when JJack posted his and same with yours.. If it doesn't work out ...So what?
As shown by Hopper last year ... even info thats correct when posted... can be wrong eventually.
I think you mean Stanley and Conway, no way they are leaving Goldy out of AFL side if we get him. He's a far superior ruckman to Stanley.Having Goldstein and Conway in the 2nds WILL hinder Conway's development by reducing his game time.
After key position players, inside mids with speed and skill are the hottest property. They are all usually snapped up in the top 10.Need Wells and co to stop the fixation with outside players and focus on an inside bull midfielder at the draft.
When was the last inside A grade inside mid recruited at the draft and not traded in/out? Selwood?
Wilson does feel very Wells like. If he's available and the top echelon are gone I'd be pretty confident we take him.I was feeling comfortable for about 2 days thinking we were safe from Sanders being gifted to Norf and we'd have at least one of the top-tier kids available at our selection.
Now I'm not so comfortable after he has been listed as Norf NGA.
Splitting the pick and getting Wilson + another okay pick would be nice if we miss on a top-rated kid... But am actually not even confident we can make that happen because I won't be shocked at all if Wilson goes one or two picks after our current #7 so there's possibly not much wiggle room at all.
Now that's assuming the club is even eyeing Wilson... I really have no clue what they are thinking or who they truly rate/want and how badly they want them.
AFL please just confirm either way on this Sanders thing and get it over with.
Wilson does feel very Wells like. If he's available and the top echelon are gone I'd be pretty confident we take him.
Outside midfielder/forward goalkicker who they'll look to move inside once he's bulked up.
He's like the anti George Stevens. Their strengths and weakness are opposites of each other, so we might as well grab both of them.
ClarkNeed Wells and co to stop the fixation with outside players and focus on an inside bull midfielder at the draft.
When was the last inside A grade inside mid recruited at the draft and not traded in/out? Selwood?
I dunno Goldy could be an improvement on Stanley tbhI think youd struggle to get Goldy to move to be a backup anyway, if we were interested I'd expect Stanley to play plenty of VFL.
Hell play every week for the Bombers and not have to be an hour away from his kids.
Essendon now out of the Sav Race
I think you mean Stanley and Conway, no way they are leaving Goldy out of AFL side if we get him. He's a far superior ruckman to Stanley.
Rhys just hasn't and doesn't stay on the parkBullshit
And what you dont factor in at all - is Stanleys got mobility - plays like a ruck rover - i love that attribute in players
Honestly Goldstein at his age - and years back - way way way back when i use to read oppo boards - the North mob had a thread title along the lines of Goldy has got concrete hands
Honest to goodness he will be the worst recruit Geelongs had since Sidebottom !!!