I'm sure the initial poster who mentioned Soligo was injured for "a few weeks" was implying he couldn't have been made the sub due to lack of preseason fitness because he was out injured for only "a few weeks". If Soligo was fit then he wouldn't have been made the sub FULL STOP and then you got others arguing they would prefer we waste the development of one of our exciting young player who is in our best 18 in a meaningless preseason SANFL game instead of a proper AFL game, now that's even a worst argument. Sure, everyone wants to be right but if it fail the logical argument then you are incorrect.This.
And all the other stuff about 2-is-a-few, a couple-is-three and three-is-nearly-four-but-not-2.
(a couple of those, quite a few in fact )