Leopards dont change their spots
http://m.heraldsun.com.au/sport/lan...d-turn-back-time/story-fngr0c3f-1227197770406
http://m.heraldsun.com.au/sport/lan...d-turn-back-time/story-fngr0c3f-1227197770406
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He didn't. As others who were part of the peleton in the mid 90s have said in recent years, if you weren't on it you couldn't win races, it was that widespread in professional cycling that it was just accepted.That way he says it, its as if he thought he didn't have a choice at the time. By saying it was so "pervasive", he's basically saying that it was so rife, that by doping, it wasn't gaining an advantage, it was merely levelling the playing field.
Tide seems to be turning in Tri world
Maybe case of now he is too old or maybe he is draw card for $ but seems everybody wants him to race
I could not think of anything worse than lance at Kona let alone winning
I would rip his goggles off in the swimI'd openly heckle him when he passes me on the bike. He has no place in our sport let alone cycling.
I would rip his goggles off in the swim
As others who were part of the peleton in the mid 90s have said in recent years, if you weren't on it you couldn't win races, it was that widespread in professional cycling that it was just accepted.
I'm actually surprised that Riis have never been stripped of his title, especially as he admitted he was on banned substances when he won back in 2007, Ullrich has also admitted he was on PEDs when he won. No-one doubts that Indurain or Pantani were also on it.Forget about winning races, if you weren't on it, you couldn't even keep up with the peloton.
Meanwhile, Lance goes down, while (other) major protagonists get off scot free (e.g., Bjarne Riis).
Riis wasn't stripped of his title because his revelations came out after the statute of limitations had expired. Lance was still within that period, hence why he lost his and those who came before him did not.I'm actually surprised that Riis have never been stripped of his title, especially as he admitted he was on banned substances when he won back in 2007, Ullrich has also admitted he was on PEDs when he won. No-one doubts that Indurain or Pantani were also on it.
Riis wasn't stripped of his title because his revelations came out after the statute of limitations had expired. Lance was still within that period, hence why he lost his and those who came before him did not.
Riis, Pantani, Indurain etc were all well past the statute of limitations period, which is (from memory) 8 years. The last couple of Armstrong's "wins" were still within that period when the charges were laid. From memory they got the period extended by arguing that he had conducted a conspiracy to avoid detection, or something similar.It doesn't matter when revelations come out, it's when the events took place. Which in Armstrong's case, were definitely covered under the statute of limitations - many of the charges and allegations go back 15 years or so. However, USADA suspended the statute of limitations in Armstrong's case because ... well, just because.
I reckon you'll find decades in the future, he'll be re-awarded the victories.
Strip him, dont strip him, frankly i dont care but if the man wants to run in the Kona Ironman and can bring some of those sweet sponsor dollars and entry fee with him then let the man race!! No special treatment, no appearance fees. Just allow him entry.