I think you missed the dollop of sarcasm there.It's not really class warfare, it's having a less unequal society when it comes to a basic necessity - shelter.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I think you missed the dollop of sarcasm there.It's not really class warfare, it's having a less unequal society when it comes to a basic necessity - shelter.
And at the end of the day, shelter shouldn't be an investment. Simple as that.I got my Land Tax statement today. It is $2,350 which is a 70% increase from $1,365 the previous year (I own a modest IP in the outer suburbs).
That is also on top of hundreds of dollars increase each year to things like insurance, council rates etc.
If people are wondering why the "evil and greedy landlords" are raising the rent then this is a perfect example. There is pressure for landlords to recover the loss and that is usually by increasing the income of the product/service they are providing like any business/investment.
I'm not expecting people patronizingly sarcastically say "oh you poor landlord having to pay expenses". I'm just pointing out to the reality that it is an investment and people ultimately will be trying to get a return on the investment.
If property investment was illegal, how would you cater toAnd at the end of the day, shelter shouldn't be an investment. Simple as that.
I think he was implying the government to provide social housing for those who don't own.If property investment was illegal, how would you cater to
(a) People who prefer to rent
(b) People who are looking for holiday accommodation
There's many reasons why people prefer renting property or having a short term stay over ownership with the associated buying and selling costs and liquidity constraints.I think he was implying the government to provide social housing for those who don't.
While a good sentiment it is impractical as to provide social housing to everybody who doesn't own will cost the government too much.
(A) public housing, where any income goes back into government spending on social programs etcIf property investment was illegal, how would you cater to
(a) People who prefer to rent
(b) People who are looking for holiday accommodation
There's a waiting list for public housing. Are you suggesting that people who can afford rent should be put on a waiting list for public housing?(A) public housing, where any income goes back into government spending on social programs etc
Hotels/motels are an investment. If property investment is wrong, why are hotels acceptable?(B) hotels/motels
We should build a lot more public housing.There's a waiting list for public housing. Are you suggesting that people who can afford rent should be put on a waiting list for public housing?
Hotels/motels are an investment. If property investment is wrong, why are hotels acceptable?
There obviously needs to be an increase in the supply of public housing, but that doesn't undermine the merit of the policy.There's a waiting list for public housing. Are you suggesting that people who can afford rent should be put on a waiting list for public housing?
I think we're both smart enough to differentiate between something purpose built as commercial property, and taking residential housing and misusing it.Hotels/motels are an investment. If property investment is wrong, why are hotels acceptable?
Yes, agreed.There obviously needs to be an increase in the supply of public housing, but that doesn't undermine the merit of the policy.
Residential property can be built with investment in mind, much the same as commercial property.I think we're both smart enough to differentiate between something purpose built as commercial property, and taking residential housing and misusing it.
When landlords are buying up dozens of residential properties each and gouging people with rent increases, they're absolutely misusing it.Yes, agreed.
Residential property can be built with investment in mind, much the same as commercial property.
You're usually a reasonable poster, but you're going off on a weird tangent with the claim that landlords are misusing residential property.
I guess that's my point. This shouldn't be occurring.Residential property can be built with investment in mind, much the same as commercial property.
Don't get it twisted, I'm not trying to put the blame on landlords. I completely understand why someone would want to invest in residential properties, it's a safe, secure income stream that's relatively low risk.You're usually a reasonable poster, but you're going off on a weird tangent with the claim that landlords are misusing residential property.
Why shouldn't I be able to kill my landlord? He has much a right to it as I do. Through my hard work of procuring an axe and using it on him, I have earnt my home. Such is the will of capitalism.
And at the end of the day, shelter shouldn't be an investment. Simple as that.
Basic housing, sure. 1 room in a shared living arrangement type deal.
But if you're looking for a nice 3BR house in a nice location and expecting the government (AKA taxpayers) to pay for it, no.
The 'right' can also be revoked if you have sufficient means to house yourself, or if you deliberately damage the property provide or are deemed particularly unsocial with the others in the residence.
In no way did I read their comment as being relevant to what you replied with.
Sorry, I jumped a couple of steps ahead on the point.
For the slow..
What do you mean by shelter?
How should it be provided?
CorrectI assumed he meant housing shouldn’t be incentivised as an investment class, not that all housing should be government owned.
or you know, sell and reinvest in shares...I got my Land Tax statement today. It is $2,350 which is a 70% increase from $1,365 the previous year (I own a modest IP in the outer suburbs).
That is also on top of hundreds of dollars increase each year to things like insurance, council rates etc.
If people are wondering why the "evil and greedy landlords" are raising the rent then this is a perfect example. There is pressure for landlords to recover the loss and that is usually by increasing the income of the product/service they are providing like any business/investment.
I'm not expecting people patronizingly sarcastically say "oh you poor landlord having to pay expenses". I'm just pointing out to the reality that it is an investment and people ultimately will be trying to get a return on the investment.
I think because they function as a commercial business with employees, have transparent business dealings etcThere's a waiting list for public housing. Are you suggesting that people who can afford rent should be put on a waiting list for public housing?
Hotels/motels are an investment. If property investment is wrong, why are hotels acceptable?
What’s it going to take for something to be done? This is just so sad to see.