I don't see much similar. McKenzie seems more athletic, and is a far better kick.Maybe McKenzie is too similiar to Casboult
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I don't see much similar. McKenzie seems more athletic, and is a far better kick.Maybe McKenzie is too similiar to Casboult
Agree but he was still worth the punt I think.McKenzie is a good kid but with some issues that would be noted in interviews only Richmond saw fit to put him on a senior list locked in for two years.
Personally hope he can flourish because Warren and the family seem like a great bunch but he's got a long road ahead of him to deal with the rigours of being a professional footballer in the spotlight that is Melbourne.
I'll get back to you in 3 years. Richmond have a stockpile of KPPs doing nothing, hopefully Reece joins Jack and Rance on the good pile. Elton, McBean etc?Agree but he was still worth the punt I think.
I think we'll regret avoiding him.
I definitely think he'll end up being useful for them.I'll get back to you in 3 years. Richmond have a stockpile of KPPs doing nothing, hopefully Reece joins Jack and Rance on the good pile. Elton, McBean etc?
Yep fair enough. Good luck to Jayden, it is fairly obvious I wanted him at the dogs as a rookie, or I wouldn't have been trolling this thread.
Did you not see the mark he practically flew over the pack against Essendon that resulted in his first goal.
What the hell are the 'BST', 'KE', 'KIE', 'HE', 'HIE' and 'HR' stats??
Who cares about the Bulldogs and Richmond's lists.
This is a welcome thread and let's keep it that way!
#1954
Don't see why we can't discuss players that we could've drafted instead.
Typical of this board
Welcome big 'Fozzie Bear'
Hopefully the club will play him in the seniors in the NAB Challenge Pre Season tournament.
Would be happy for him to have Waite's old number 30, or even if the number his old man wore at Footscray is available
In a sense, I'm disappointed we didn't take a chance on Foster, but the club had thoroughly done it's research and determined that we were better off looking elsewhere (and I'm inclined to agree), so I'll back their judgement. I'm very happy with the boys we've got, and wish Jayden all the best in navy blue. Hopefully he's a late bloomer, like his Dad.
Is there any chance Nick Graham vacates the #32 locker so Foster can wear his old man's number? Peter also wore 28 during his short stint at Fitzroy, but even given the height difference I don't like his chances if he challenges Chesty Bond for the #28.
Ben or Tom will take itThe number might be an issue if he went to the Dogs. I'd dare say he wouldn't care given it is a different club. Even at Carlton, Lance Whitnall wore a different number to father Graeme, Dylan Buckley wears a different number to father Jim, Luke Blackwell wore a different number to father Wayne. They seem to want to stand alone.
Even if we take Silvagni's elder son who is available next year I believe, I don't see Walker being asked to give up the #1 guernsey.
That's true. I suppose it's a nice touch if the number is vacant and no shuffling around has to be done, but they do like to carve out their own legacy, regardless. Tom Liberatore chose #21 as opposed to Tony's #39, and Mitch Wallis chose #3 rather than Stephen's #24. Even the great Ted Whitten's son wore #22, rather than his old man's famous #3.The number might be an issue if he went to the Dogs. I'd dare say he wouldn't care given it is a different club. Even at Carlton, Lance Whitnall wore a different number to father Graeme, Dylan Buckley wears a different number to father Jim, Luke Blackwell wore a different number to father Wayne. They seem to want to stand alone.
Even if we take Silvagni's elder son who is available next year I believe, I don't see Walker being asked to give up the #1 guernsey.
Ben or Tom will take it