ppl tend to forget Conca had a good pre-season last year (his 1st full one) but copped an injury at the very end of itConca looks in good condition finally
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
ppl tend to forget Conca had a good pre-season last year (his 1st full one) but copped an injury at the very end of itConca looks in good condition finally
it's an interesting point, you'd imagine of them, one is next in line for a fwd spot (esp if Griff don't get his act together)IMO most people now see RMac as the most likely to take over from Jack instead of Mcbean?
Yeah, I am looking forward to the traning videos and pics.Rioli's first day today ?
Based on what? Apart from raw size MB has him covered in all the main areas.IMO most people now see RMac as the most likely to take over from Jack instead of Mcbean?
Studies have shown increased natural levels of HGH from extended consumption of Green Tea alsoIn Tonga they have these yams which contain naturally occurring growth hormones. Works.
Get a box a week into McBean and Mabior.
In Tonga they have these yams which contain naturally occurring growth hormones. Works.
Get a box a week into McBean and Mabior.
Willy police station ?Dea likely to Willy, I read just now
Based on what? Apart from raw size MB has him covered in all the main areas.
Yep, if McKenzie is to make it, it will be as a genuine FF/CHF. McBean on the other hand probably becomes a Gunston-type third tall if he makes itWrong.
McKenzie is a better mark, both on the lead and contested, is also more explosive off the mark and has the frame.
McBean is more agile, cleaner below his knees, better shot at goal.
They both have areas they are better at than the other. To say McBean is ahead of McKenzie in main areas apart from frame is just plain wrong.
For me, if we wanted another marking target if Vickery/Griff go out injured, you would almost have to play McKenzie, as he suits the role better.
If we want to play a three tall forward lineup with Jack, Vick/Griff, McBean is the go to, as I don't think McKenzies game is suited to being a third tall, with his leading patterns.
Yep, get Bean an elite tank and he likely plays every game.Yep, if McKenzie is to make it, it will be as a genuine FF/CHF. McBean on the other hand probably becomes a Gunston-type third tall if he makes it
Fair enough with the marking attributes. I still put McBean ahead for Jack's spot... which by the way is what the discussion is about.Wrong.
McKenzie is a better mark, both on the lead and contested, is also more explosive off the mark and has the frame.
McBean is more agile, cleaner below his knees, better shot at goal.
They both have areas they are better at than the other. To say McBean is ahead of McKenzie in main areas apart from frame is just plain wrong.
For me, if we wanted another marking target if Vickery/Griff go out injured, you would almost have to play McKenzie, as he suits the role better.
If we want to play a three tall forward lineup with Jack, Vick/Griff, McBean is the go to, as I don't think McKenzies game is suited to being a third tall, with his leading patterns.
Beans issue is just this. It may never be good enough for AFL footy.Yep, get Bean an elite tank and he likely plays every game.
Rioli in the new training vid today
I liked his miskick and then mini melt at himselfI like Mabior's moves
I liked his miskick and then mini melt at himself
Rioli in the new training vid today
Id be nervous too if i was amongst 3x EF specialists.You'd be bloody nervous for a fair while, eh. Fluffing a kick to a leading gun would have you up nights
I asked Liam McBean what his weight is today and he said he is upto 97kgs