Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The Pavlich free? where he turned around took his eyes of the ball and waited for Richards to cannon into him? what is the issue that the free went against him?
Bit rich. How about you leave the guy who just had the class to congratulate us on our board.
If he had have hit all his targets and kicked straight he would have cracked the double ton in super coach i reckon.What was that everyone was saying at the end of last year about McGlynn not being in the best 22?
Yep. Umpire got that one right
Reckon we oughta be a bit careful about this sort of thinking.Next 2 games are Demons and Lions - we will be 4/3 with Tippett back.
If you look at the replay it confirms this...it amazes me though how they can make a 50 50 call like that yet not call blatant frees for holds on players or holding the ball/ incorrect disposals....letting the game flow is disrespecting the game...rules are rules.....pay the bloody frees.Pavlich took his eye of the ball and had a look for Richards. Lynch called it wrong. Call was correct. Had Pavlich kept his eye on the ball and held his ground without bending then yes free to Pav. As it played out correct call but will concede those can go either way. Check back though Pav looked at Richards coming in not the ball.
Reckon we oughta be a bit careful about this sort of thinking.
Off topic SR , I don't think LRT will go back ( 3rd tall ) this year a little to slow now I thinkJust disagreed with him, didnt threaten his life
I was just confused reading the MB and the Freo board everyone going nuts at that decision i thought they were thinking of another incident
Unless i don't understand the interpretation?
No, that was a rubbish decision. But, we had decisions go against us (especially with Buddy) too. The umpiring was a bit ordinary, not the worst, but not great either, and while I feel a bit aggrieved I can see why Freo fans do too. That's how it is when the umpiring isn't great, fans always remember the ones that cost their team and forget about the others.
That 50 against McGlynn was tough. The free kick was paid 10 meters to the left but the umpire just allowed the Freo player to change his line dramatically and continue to creep around. Mcglynn kept coming around to cover the natural arc and got pinged. He probably just crept over but had the umpire done his job in the first place calling the Freo player to play on then who knows what would have happened (Pav mark and goal probably ha ha)
Correct good sir. As soon as he took his eyes off the ball it become a shepherd.Pavlich took his eye of the ball and had a look for Richards. Lynch called it wrong. Call was correct. Had Pavlich kept his eye on the ball and held his ground without bending then yes free to Pav. As it played out correct call but will concede those can go either way. Check back though Pav looked at Richards coming in not the ball.
Off topic SR , I don't think LRT will go back ( 3rd tall ) this year a little to slow now I think
Umpiring was dreadful all day. In particular, I reckon the Pav penalty for tunneling was the worst of a bad bunch. Anyway, each to their own.
Congrats again on the win
Thought Johnson showed him up a littleAgree he only could if ted or reg missed
I thought he was ok today though
But if we wanted to avoid rucking tippett he is gone
Yup we were going to be 1/1 with percentage if I recall.Reckon we oughta be a bit careful about this sort of thinking.
Main board thread. Main contributors. One eyed Freo supporters incapable of making a balanced judgement. Hawthorn supporters with a severe case of separation anxiety and are taking it out on their loved one who left them for a better life. Essendon supporters desperate to incite hatred to eclipse that thrown at their tainted club.I was just confused reading the MB and the Freo board everyone going nuts at that decision i thought they were thinking of another incident
Unless i don't understand the interpretation?
With all due respect buddy, if you're pulling me up on this, you're over-modding. The guy had the class/respect to congratulate us TWICE, and reminding someone of this should be seen as a good thing whether its on the street, in the office, at home, or on a message board. Its called integrity.How about you leave the moderating to those who have the role by either reporting the post or PM the other mod on this board. Other than that fair call
With all due respect buddy, if you're pulling me up on this, you're over-modding. The guy had the class/respect to congratulate us TWICE, and reminding someone of this should be seen as a good thing whether its on the street, in the office, at home, or on a message board. Its called integrity.
Thought Johnson showed him up a little
ok cool.I'm agreeing with you, opposition fans have every right to post without being attacked but at the same time telling you the proper process to deal with posts you feel are over the top which you clearly pointed out