Doss
Ass
- Aug 1, 2011
- 75,214
- 112,305
- AFL Club
- Essendon
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No you don't have to read every one of them but maybe try with one. I'll link you specific text when I get home from work if you'd like to keep wriggling around.You give links to studies. So what? You expect me to go through and read every one and debunk every one? For all we know, you simply post links to make it seem like you have researched. Show me the parts of the studies that prove your point. Remember that it is your side calling for mass chemical concoction injections, it is up to you to make your case. Show the parts of the studies that prove your case.
The very first link I clicked on from another poster in this thread yesterday, the abstract itself admitted that the vaccines didn't stop an outbreak! And the sample size for 'effectiveness' was 200 kids. Pathetic. I'm not wasting my time any more, you SHOW ME YOUR EVIDENCE, quote the parts that prove your point, make your case, and we will talk.
Must be because I watched the footy on TV last weekMEB_, you indoctrinted drone you.
Describing us as peasants is is not a personal attack, it is a statement of historical fact. You might not like it this way, but your feelings have no bearing on reality. We are the peasants. The people calling the shots at the top are not.Aren't you the one who bristles at personal attacks? Your hypocrisy only damages your credibility even further.
Describing us as peasants is is not a personal attack, it is a statement of historical fact. You might not like it this way, but your feelings have no bearing on reality. We are the peasants. The people calling the shots at the top are not.
At least peasants can revolt. You people see yourself as CATTLE, as a 'herd' who needs to be mass injected with chemical concoctions, who needs to trust what your authorities (cattle farmers) tell you.
You would almost certainly go along with it, and argue that other people should be forced to submit to the microchipping too, for 'the good of the herd'.Also am due for my whopping cough booster...what if they microchip me while I'm there?
Well there you go. People using 'smallpox' as an argument for mass chemical concoction injection ought to wonder why they still refer to smallpox as an excuse to administer this stuff to babies in 2015.
You would almost certainly go along with it, and argue that other people should be forced to submit to the microchipping too, for 'the good of the herd'.
They are churning out kids who have genuinely lost their minds. Mass indoctrination on a scale Orwell could only have nightmared about.
I would appreciate that. Let's have a proper discussion, which can begin when your side begins providing evidence.No you don't have to read every one of them but maybe try with one. I'll link you specific text when I get home from work if you'd like to keep wriggling around.
90% confidence with a 6% margin of error. Well gee, have my baby, inject whatever the hell you like, seems fool-proof!A sample size of 200 in a population the size of our own country is enough for about a 90% confidence level with roughly a 6% margin of error.
I think you've genuinely lost your mind.
I'm just returning all the personal attacks he sends my wayas discussed earlier in this thread, I think it likely SB has an undeveloped right brain.
I'm just returning all the personal attacks he sends my way
Would you support mass-microchipping of babies if the tv told you to do so? What if most people also believed it was 'for the good of the herd'?I think you've genuinely lost your mind.
Would you support mass-microchipping of babies if the tv told you to do so? What if most people also believed it was 'for the good of the herd'?
Or would you make up your own mind, even if that meant being in the minority, and argue against such statist madness?
Because that is precisely what comes next. It ought to be obvious but alas most people cannot think ahead.
http://www.cbn.com/cbnnews/us/2012/october/big-brother-school-district-tracks-kids-with-rfid-/
http://www.theage.com.au/digital-li...ive-got-you-under-my-skin-20140416-zqvho.html
You posted them a dozen pages ago. Get some new material... by the way have a look at that link I proivded, I'd like your views, summarised, if possible.Would you support mass-microchipping of babies if the tv told you to do so? What if most people also believed it was 'for the good of the herd'?
Or would you make up your own mind, even if that meant being in the minority, and argue against such statist madness?
Because that is precisely what comes next. It ought to be obvious but alas most people cannot think ahead.
http://www.cbn.com/cbnnews/us/2012/october/big-brother-school-district-tracks-kids-with-rfid-/
http://www.theage.com.au/digital-li...ive-got-you-under-my-skin-20140416-zqvho.html
Which means that you trust the government and big pharma. Which, with the greatest of respect, makes you a naive fool. I am not sure how much more blatant their disregard for your wellbeing has to be before you realise that government and big pharma DO NOT CARE ABOUT YOU, in fact those at the top of the control grid openly despise you. And yet you trust what they inject into your children, without even asking to see proof that there is no long-term harm.
Naive and foolish in the extreme.
You want other people to be forced to have chemical concoctions injected into them so that YOUR chemical concoction injections become effective? Do you not see how absurd that sounds?
As for your remarks about 'anti-vaxxers' being followers, I would imagine that there are some out there who haven't taken the time to look into things properly for themselves. In my anecdotal experience however, all of the 'anti-vaxxers' I know were originally tv zombies like myself (and just about everybody else on this forum) and therefore went along with the pro-vaxx nonsense until they DID do some research.
We know what it is like to trust tv and government, and we know what it is like to realise that THEY ARE LYING TO US.
I believe Tenpenny would have loved to have debated a pharma company representative, and I also believe a pharma company rep wouldn't be stupid enough to take up any offer to debate somebody like Tenpenny.
We will never know because Tenpenny was banned, while big pharma reps have direct access to our politicians. And you people support this s**t. The power of school indoctrination and tv is truly phenomenal.
Like all the evidence you were given that you apparently need your hand held to get through? And yes 6% is large hence why there are hundreds of other studies some with much bigger samples. You're selectively choosing parts of my posts to quote because you're disingenuous and unwilling to educate yourself.I would appreciate that. Let's have a proper discussion, which can begin when your side begins providing evidence.
90% confidence with a 6% margin of error. Well gee, have my baby, inject whatever the hell you like, seems fool-proof!
You should really stop watching TV Prob! You're making sense and it's scaryLike all the evidence you were given that you apparently need your hand held to get through? And yes 6% is large hence why there are hundreds of other studies some with much bigger samples. You're selectively choosing parts of my posts to quote because you're disingenuous and unwilling to educate yourself.
Like all the evidence you were given that you apparently need your hand held to get through? And yes 6% is large hence why there are hundreds of other studies some with much bigger samples. You're selectively choosing parts of my posts to quote because you're disingenuous and unwilling to educate yourself.
Luke Darcy controls the Freemasons. BT did 9/11!You should really stop watching TV Prob! You're making sense and it's scary