scott_the_man
Club Legend
- Feb 25, 2014
- 2,304
- 2,936
- AFL Club
- Brisbane Lions
both the same age, height, weight and from the same draft. both are influencial midfielders to their teams and will likely be captains some day. who's better?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Both are underrated, people have hard ons for Danger and Fyfe but these 2 are just as good if not better.
Beams is a better kick than those 2 and kicks more goals , much more damagingNah, they have foundations as good as those two but aren't on the same level in regards to burst impact that wins games.
Beams is a better kick than those 2 and kicks more goals , much more damaging
NopeDreaming.
Both are underrated
Who would you mention in front of him? Cloke would be the only one, and he's always the second player mentioned. So Beams is always third mentioned, and is the 2nd best mid at that club currently.Beams is overrated as he's often the second player mentioned (behind Pendlebury) whenever Collingwood are talked about.
Danger and Fyfe play their best when it matters. Beams and Rockliff are great but more of accumulators but can be really damaging but not in the same level as Fyfe n Danger.Both are underrated, people have hard ons for Danger and Fyfe but these 2 are just as good if not better.
Picked Beams because he's a goal kicker
Didn't know thatI Know it's not relevant any more but rockliff is actually a forward. Kicked 59 goals in the TAC
Possibly that's why he was overlooked in national draft? That they didn't know what position he would play at AFL?I Know it's not relevant any more but rockliff is actually a forward. Kicked 59 goals in the TAC
was overlooked because he was considered a poor athlete. didnt have any good athletic attributes like speed, agility, strength or endurance. luckily brisbane realised he was a natural footballer and drafted him for that reasonPossibly that's why he was overlooked in national draft? That they didn't know what position he would play at AFL?
Thats just not true. Beams and Rockliff have both performed better than Fyfe and Danger in the big moments this year.Danger and Fyfe play their best when it matters. Beams and Rockliff are great but more of accumulators but can be really damaging but not in the same level as Fyfe n Danger.
Adding to that I'll quote Leppa "He goes alright for a bloke with his body"was overlooked because he was considered a poor athlete. didnt have any good athletic attributes like speed, agility, strength or endurance. luckily brisbane realised he was a natural footballer and drafted him for that reason