- Jan 21, 2013
- 1,474
- 1,967
- AFL Club
- Western Bulldogs
I think it was one solitary Essendon player, not players, David 'I'm scared of needles' Zaharakis. He may have been smarter that the rest or just genuinely hated needles.I strongly disagree with the bolded part. There were Essendon players who chose not to participate so clearly there were some warning signs. I can forgive a first or second year player who would have felt pressured to participate to show commitment, earn their place, etc. but not the captain of the team. On the contrary I think he let his teammates down massively, he should have been a leader in making sure everything was above board, instead he set an example of let’s just go with what the club says, and as a result many players careers suffered.
In regards to Lynch, If you take a premiership away there are 21 innocent players who did not take a banned substance who suffer. When said player was permitted to play by the league and had not used the banned substance for some time before those premierships then I don’t think that would be fair. Can you take a premiership medal off one specific player? I don’t think so. It’s all or none IMO.
Taking the Brownlow away from Jobe only affects Jobe. The reality is he was using a banned substance at the time he won that award. Is it rough to take it away? maybe. Is it fair to the rest of the competition to let him keep it? Absolutely not.
Put this as plain and simple as possible. If you get suspended for an action in a season you are ineligible to win the Brownlow. Jobe was suspended for an action in the 2012 season, therefore he is ineligible for the 2012 Brownlow Medal.
As for the no advantage claim, we will never know if he gained any advantage at all, but it would certainly be a big coincidence if he had his career best year in a season where he was using a banned substance designed to enhance performance.
So, players are more deserving of punishment if they are older? He was still a young man of 27, and a bit of a late bloomer because they didn't work out his best position until late in his career. He possibly felt even more pressure than most to toe the line and do what was being asked of him as captain. Not to mention trust some key people he'd known most of his young life.
Always easier to scape goat individuals, doesn't make it the right thing to do.
No big co-incidence, he just so happened to be in the prime of his career, which was unfortunately then derailed after the drug scandal.
Any way you're welcome to your opinion and I'm welcome to mine.