Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Interesting that it was basically Mitch or Blake. So, despite all the nice things Watters said about Blake last year at several points, he wouldn't have been afraid to get rid of him for the sake of a big bodied defender.
Says alot.
Pretty sure he meant it in a complimentary way. The whole team over the individual thing.Blake understand's the process, but you can't.
Every year some players will need to be delisted simply to comply with regulations. It doesn't mean the coach hates them or whatever. If anyone knows exactly who he is and how he fits in with the sceme of things it's Jason Blake.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Interesting that it was basically Mitch or Blake. So, despite all the nice things Watters said about Blake last year at several points, he wouldn't have been afraid to get rid of him for the sake of a big bodied defender.
Says alot.
Jason Gram has unleashed on Saints about his sacking http://t.co/kD88SBn4FV
Gram actually sounds quite forthright, it's just the sub-editors have gotten carried away with the headlines.
Gram actually sounds quite forthright, it's just the sub-editors have gotten carried away with the headlines.
If you read just the direct quotes, not the parts where Ralphy's spun his magic, his side makes sense. There's a chunk of denial going on and I'm not saying St Kilda probably weren't right to move him on, but he's told his side and hopefully that's that.Which bit?
That he was blindsided by the club?
That it's a private matter? (on twitter and through the courts)
That it's just full blown lies?
St Kilda have had a few issues in the past?
Other clubs have said they wouldn't have done that?
These are his comments (not headlines).
That, and the Hun just can't resist trying to find some way - however flimsy - to rake our name through the mud.
He does have a shot at the Saints, can't beat around the bush and pretend he hasn't.
I often whack the club if I think it's due.
This is not one of those times, as a young woman supporting the club, I support the high standards it is attempting to hold up in regards to the respect and responsibility policies.
The club has had a battering in recent years, if he professes to love the Saints, and can't see how his behaviour was absolutely further damaging...he has more soul searching to do.
He says it was a private matter, I reckon it would be safe to guess who blurred the lines between home and work first.
He does have a shot at the Saints, can't beat around the bush and pretend he hasn't.
I often whack the club if I think it's due.
This is not one of those times, as a young woman supporting the club, I support the high standards it is attempting to hold up in regards to the respect and responsibility policies.
The club has had a battering in recent years, if he professes to love the Saints, and can't see how his behaviour was absolutely further damaging...he has more soul searching to do.
He says it was a private matter, I reckon it would be safe to guess who blurred the lines between home and work first.
It clearly didn't effect his output at "work" as he played his best football in years at the end of year when the whole "incident" was going down. Never once did he not turn upto training, team meetings etc.
Whilst I support clubs actions, it really isn't a football issue, it was his private life. He should have known better, but hell he isn't the first and won't be last person it that will go through same thing. AFL players just have less leeway than "normal" people.