2015; Player X or Player Y or Player Z

[Flags_In_The_Bag]

Saw Ollie up close and personal Friday night at the internal 'match simulation', Jesus Christ is all I have to say! He is a bloody beast, it was actually scary how a kid can be so big and fit. He was breaking every single tackle, clearing it at will from the centre and even slotted into full forward for a little bit and presented very well. Looked insanely fit, even though he is so big. Looks like a man now and no longer a big young boy.

That's what the dogs are saying about Bonti now in his 2nd year, looks huge for a 19 year old.

 

[karaoke]

I read somewhere Houli has d/e issues and that's why his scores are 2nd level

Most defenders this year will be 2nd level anyway, with 90+ being the new premium mark.

Ticks the durable box (his 86 games over last 4 yrs narrowly pips Simpson's 85) & if he can sneak back up to 90 ave would be ok (this year).

He's in that 85-90 range for mine.

Just thinking at this stage.....

 

[toxic]

Most defenders this year will be 2nd level anyway, with 90+ being the new premium mark.

Ticks the durable box (his 86 games over last 4 yrs narrowly pips Simpson's 85) & if he can sneak back up to 90 ave would be ok (this year).

He's in that 85-90 range for mine.

Just thinking at this stage.....

He's a very very interesting option who if he improved his d/e could easily go 90+ imo

 

[Flags_In_The_Bag]

Mitch Clarke, Jessie Hogan, Jack Redpath?

 

[Flandersss]

Mitch Clarke, Jessie Hogan, Jack Redpath?

Jack Lonie.

You can thank me later.

 

[TheOz]

lol like most people did, so no gain there.

The bloke I played didn't

 

[Flags_In_The_Bag]

Jack Lonie.

You can thank me later.

Redpath, you can thank me later too

 

[Flandersss]

Redpath, you can thank me later too

Key forward.

Tend to stay away from them, but thanks anyway

 

[Flags_In_The_Bag]

Key forward.

Tend to stay away from them, but thanks anyway

So do I, but at his price and the fact he kicks goals goes in to ruck and down back also means he will score ok.

 

[rocker_oz33]

If big red was fwd/ruck yeah he could be a option but only a fwd so no.

 

[timtamWB]

Do not go for Redpath whatever you do. Hopefully he'll be a good player for us, but he's not good for SC.

 

[GOAUS!]

So do I, but at his price and the fact he kicks goals goes in to ruck and down back also means he will score ok.

At his price no, if he was at sub 140k then I would consider. At 200k rookie you want to be really sure that they'll average in the 80's minimum.

 

[Lums23]

Redpath, you can thank me later too

Why ask then?

 

[Flags_In_The_Bag]

Why ask then?

Because I am leaning towards him, other two I was considering in that 3 bracket, happy?

 

[Conz9]

rank in order:
dane rampe, scott d thompson, lumumba, newes as D3/D4.

Also:
Ablett & Stevens/Crouch/Swallow
vs
Any other two midfielders in the comp.

 

[CotchyPls]

Gray v Lids v Buddy

 

[timtamWB]

rank in order:
dane rampe, scott d thompson, lumumba, newes as D3/D4.

Also:
Ablett & Stevens/Crouch/Swallow
vs
Any other two midfielders in the comp.

Newnes, Rampe, Thompson, Lumumba

And

Ablett & Crouch. Always go for Ablett.

Welcome to BF

 

[Flags_In_The_Bag]

Do not go for Redpath whatever you do. Hopefully he'll be a good player for us, but he's not good for SC.

disagree, I think all three will find the ball and score ok

 

[Flandersss]

Gray v Lids v Buddy

Buddy.

 

[timtamWB]

disagree, I think all three will find the ball and score ok

I know you from the Bulldogs board. You're not going to listen to anyone and just going to try and say how all these different Dogs players are good SC options, when they're not.

I'm removing bias from my advice to try and give people the best help. I was top 500 until the last 3 rounds last year, so I like to think I know what I'm doing. Whereas the team you just posted in the SC show me your team thread will be lucky to break the 50,000 mark.

So, and I say this with all the kindness in the world, please shut up. You have no idea what you're talking about.

 

[Flandersss]

I know you from the Bulldogs board. You're not going to listen to anyone and just going to try and say how all these different Dogs players are good SC options, when they're not.

I'm removing bias from my advice to try and give people the best help. I was top 500 until the last 3 rounds last year, so I like to think I know what I'm doing. Whereas the team you just posted in the SC show me your team thread will be lucky to break the 50,000 mark.

So, and I say this with all the kindness in the world, please shut up. You have no idea what you're talking about.

Do we have another Gillo94 here?

 

[timtamWB]

Do we have another Gillo94 here?

The Bulldogs version, yes.

 

[SureBuddy]

Gray v Lids v Buddy

Gray by a country mile.

 

[Flags_In_The_Bag]

I know you from the Bulldogs board. You're not going to listen to anyone and just going to try and say how all these different Dogs players are good SC options, when they're not.

I'm removing bias from my advice to try and give people the best help. I was top 500 until the last 3 rounds last year, so I like to think I know what I'm doing. Whereas the team you just posted in the SC show me your team thread will be lucky to break the 50,000 mark.

So, and I say this with all the kindness in the world, please shut up. You have no idea what you're talking about.

I was not a biased thing and I couldn't care a less what score you got last year, and to say shut up about somebody else's opinion to comes across as just plain stupid. there have been a heap of stupid comparisons on here that I have seen and not once have I wrote to them to shut up you don't know what your talking about. And as far as the side that I put up in that forum topic, it was meant to be written on its a starter as in first draft, you have no clue as to what score I got last year, so I think you should pipe down about you knowing more about it.

 

[Flags_In_The_Bag]

The Bulldogs version, yes.

Im far from a biased one eyed person