Current Royal Commission into Lawyer X gangland convictions on tainted evidence & police corruption

Remove this Banner Ad

Last edited:

Log in to remove this ad.

Melsy said:
That's your interpretation.
Click to expand...

It's not so much my interpretation but rather it's the interpretation of any person with half a brain cell.

It's the fact of the law, you can't convict without evidence and you can not break the law in order to gain evidence.

Clearly you have some sort of issues in regards to understanding of the most simplest of concepts in regard to the law, maybe lawyer x and you got your education about it in the same place lol
 
No one knows whats going on! No one knows the law.

Not even the law knows the law by the looks.

Open the gates! Release the baddest of the baddest!

Lawyers will make money.
 
ArmandD said:
It's not so much my interpretation but rather it's the interpretation of any person with half a brain cell.

It's the fact of the law, you can't convict without evidence and you can not break the law in order to gain evidence.

Clearly you have some sort of issues in regards to understanding of the most simplest of concepts in regard to the law, maybe lawyer x and you got your education about it in the same place lol
Click to expand...

That's your interpretation
 
I will say this weighs heavily on whether the lawyer was in the court at the same time with the client.

All I'm hearing right now, is forum people declaring this so in how many cases? Like they know each case.

I think it will weigh heavily when the information was supplied to police. Registered informant, that's right.

It's all about time.
 
All these hard core criminals know not to wear their heart on their sleeve.

Carl Williams even suspected his lawyer an informant.
 
Chameleon75 said:
She likes to have her name in lights.

From what I read it came about when the informants identity was exposed when she was due to give evidence at a trial, then the alarm bells went off.
Click to expand...

There's a few people that stand to make a bob or two. Zarah will be one of those. She'd be top of the list.
 
Is there something we all don’t know yet.
Vic Pol would have had lawyers give the tick to anything they did, this would have been at the highest level.

If they got said tick I wonder on what basis it was given.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Slartibartfast said:
Just another thought.
If said criminal was upto his nuts in said lawyers guts , any info garnished at this time would this still come under lawyer/client privilege???
Click to expand...

Thats a personal matter. Not being paid, well that may get blurry.
 
Herne Hill Hammer said:
Yep. Part 10 was the relevant section that names her.
Click to expand...

That was Heliotis signalling, that wasnt all he signalled either if we pay attention to what he said. And I'm pretty sure at that time, her name may have been under suppression.

This has been coming for a very long time.
 
Melsy said:
No one knows whats going on! No one knows the law.

Not even the law knows the law by the looks.

Open the gates! Release the baddest of the baddest!

Lawyers will make money.
Click to expand...
You're worried about criminals going free?
They were arrested, so they must of done something? Why have a trial? Well we could change over to the Chinese system of jurisprudence. Have a trial just for sentencing. Decide who goes into the educational camps for fattening up, or who gets executed straight away for organ harvesting. Either way their kidneys get to be useful I suppose....
Just get John to draw a picture of a spanner and you've got him eh? Nice touch, john even drew the word sidchrome on it. Must be guilty then....
Yeah, nup. We shall risk a few getting off if the process is incorruptible. And we know what happens when the process is corrupted.

Sent from my HTC 2PQ910 using Tapatalk
 
Slartibartfast said:
Is there something we all don’t know yet.
Vic Pol would have had lawyers give the tick to anything they did, this would have been at the highest level.

If they got said tick I wonder on what basis it was given.
Click to expand...
Nah VicPol are a law unto themselves. they don't need underlings to sign off on things.
 
Slartibartfast said:
If it got to the point where convictions were set aside , would they not still be held with bail denied awaiting re trial??
I agree justice needs to be fair but these guys are the lowest of lows and justice still needs to be served.
Click to expand...

No, not if the evidence they were convicted on is tainted and inadmissable.

They walk.
 
Slartibartfast said:
If it got to the point where convictions were set aside , would they not still be held with bail denied awaiting re trial??
I agree justice needs to be fair but these guys are the lowest of lows and justice still needs to be served.
Click to expand...

I understand that viewpoint but I’d want them to walk, personally.

As individuals they’re not worth pissing on, but I don’t want to live in a place where everybody doesn’t get a fair trial.
 
Bunk Moreland said:
I understand that viewpoint but I’d want them to walk, personally.

As individuals they’re not worth pissing on, but I don’t want to live in a place where everybody doesn’t get a fair trial.
Click to expand...
Happy for convictions to be set aside but a new judge will look at what evidence is on offer and go from there . Untainted by what has preceded.
These guys are genuine flight risks so if a new trial looks like it will happen they may struggle to get bail.
Still want to know why Vic Pol legals signed off on this. Think there is a bit more we dont know.
 
Tigertamer said:
It is Garde-Wilson this was, good throw off by her though making statements in the paper to distance herself. This has been known for years!
Click to expand...

ArmandD said:
Read this article:
https://www.theage.com.au/national/...lice-top-lawyer-speaks-out-20100430-tzfw.html

Then compare it with the letter from lawyer x here:
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-12...er-to-police-informant-her-own-words/10579100
Click to expand...

Chameleon75 said:
Garde-Wilson is a solicitor the informant was a barrister. Garde-Wilson is still practicing the informant no longer practices.

No it’s not her.
Click to expand...

shellyg said:
Zarah is being hailed today as the mastermind behind exposing the police - RC. No she's not the mastermind, she's the front. It's the QCs behind this.

https://www.9news.com.au/2018/12/04...son-gangland-lawyer-informant-lawyer-x-police
Click to expand...

So I was reading this Herald Sun article this morning

https://www.heraldsun.com.au/truecr...s/news-story/9eb94543a179c9855425b24f7442e7b6

when I noticed that they had unintentionally/accidentally/deliberately published LawyerX real name in the graphic below (where I circled LawyerX) I took a screenshot of the original graphic before the Herald Sun edited the graphic replacing her name with LawyerX. I haven't checked if the "mistake" made it onto the print version, but I suspect someone at News Ltd might be losing their job today for the ballsup as it was still up until mid morning. Anyway, it's definitely not Zarah Garde Wilson. The nickname in the article that Hodson gave LawyerX "Sharon 20 Stone" describes her quite well.

x.JPG
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

J
Government and Public Service Corruption
Replies
13
Views
1K
Bostonian
Bostonian
Kurve
Current Met Police Crimes - London * 1,000 officers currently suspended
Replies
8
Views
1K
Kurve
Kurve
Flog111
Police commissioner son in SA dies in alleged hit and run
Replies
9
Views
770
Festerz
Festerz
Kurve
Current Sydney criminal lawyer Mahmoud Abbas gunned down
Replies
2
Views
652
Kurve
Kurve
Kurve
Current The crimes of corrupt cop Adrian Trevor Moore - WA * Sentenced to 30 years
2
Replies
26
Views
4K
PenrithGWS
PenrithGWS
Kurve
Unsolved Murder of ACDC Manager Crispin Dye 1993 * LGBTQ+ Hate Crime Inquiry Finds New Evidence
Replies
4
Views
800
Kurve
Kurve
CD Xbow
NSW Police killing of Brad Balzan
2
Replies
32
Views
1K
burge13
B

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top