- Joined
- Sep 12, 2003
- Posts
- 20,323
- Reaction score
- 24,335
- Location
- under the table
- AFL Club
- Essendon
- Other Teams
- Not important
How many changes do we expect to see this week? LOL
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

UnchangedHow many changes do we expect to see this week? LOL
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
I think 99 points is still pretty impressiveEither we win by 100+ and play how we should, or we're better off losing.
How many changes do we expect to see this week? LOL
Either we win by 100+ and play how we should, or we're better off losing.
10-2 inside 50s in the first 10 minutes for 5 behinds. St Kilda goes to other end an kicks a goal. Scrap for the rest of the game
Yes, I cant say I'm looking forward to a victory this week "relieving pressure" or showing the "real Essendon". The week to week fluctuarions in fortune is one of the most non-sensical parts of football coverage/analysis.
Melbourne is the next relevant game, unless of course we lose to the Saints. It would be hard to argue that a loss to the Sainst should be ignored.
What are the odds this game gets moved to the MCG given the turf at Etihad and that there's no game there on Saturday?
Telling the players to go to the G instead? It's been done before. St. Kilda v. Hawthorn in 2000 was moved to the MCG because the surface at the stadium was unsafe.Have you thought about the logistics of moving the game? A portion of the surface is being replaced before the game anyway.
If we play Clarke ahead of Draper, I'm going to be so disappointed.Parish and Z.Clarke are the two possible ins i think.
If we play Clarke ahead of Draper, I'm going to be so disappointed.
I'm going to be disappointed aren't I.
Whatever happened to my man Jimmy Stewart, is he with Jesus now or something? Why is he not in the discussion for the forward line, at the very least he knows how to lead even if he struggles to clunk.
Shows Woosha has no forward thinking if he does go with ClarkeIf we play Clarke ahead of Draper, I'm going to be so disappointed.
I'm going to be disappointed aren't I.
Shows Woosha has no forward thinking if he does go with Clarke
Clarke is ahead of Draper. If we thought Draper would be AFL ready we wouldn't have brought Clarke in in the first place.If we play Clarke ahead of Draper, I'm going to be so disappointed.
I'm going to be disappointed aren't I.
Yes they would have, still need depth for injuries etc. It's also possible Draper has exceeded where they thought he'd be at over preseason.Clarke is ahead of Draper. If we thought Draper would be AFL ready we wouldn't have brought Clarke in in the first place.
Clarke is a bargain basement, no frills, home brand replacement for the retirement of lungbutter, who was the third choice ruckman last year.Clarke is ahead of Draper. If we thought Draper would be AFL ready we wouldn't have brought Clarke in in the first place.
Well that's factually incorrect. McKernan never played as a ruck ahead of Leuenberger.Clarke is a bargain basement, no frills, home brand replacement for the retirement of lungbutter, who was the third choice ruckman last year.
Telling the players to go to the G instead? It's been done before. St. Kilda v. Hawthorn in 2000 was moved to the MCG because the surface at the stadium was unsafe.
Didnt we finally work out that McKernan was a forward last year?Well that's factually incorrect. McKernan never played as a ruck ahead of Leuenberger.



