Transgender

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
Please be aware that the tolerance of anti-trans language on BF is at an all-time low. Jokes and insults that are trans-related, as well as anti-trans and bigoted rhetoric will be met with infractions, threadbans etc as required. It's a sensitive (and important) topic, so behave like well-mannered adults when discussing it, PARTICULARLY when disagreeing. This equally applies across the whole site.
 
Last edited:
There are black teens. White teens. Gay teens. Trans teens. Straight teens. Metalhead teens. Techno teens. Emo teens. Sporty teens. Nerdy teens. It's the real world. These are the people in our neighbourhood.
So what is incredible about the show foscu on a trans teen then?
 
There are black teens. White teens. Gay teens. Trans teens. Straight teens. Metalhead teens. Techno teens. Emo teens. Sporty teens. Nerdy teens. It's the real world. These are the people in our neighbourhood.

*, I thought I was on PornHub for a second there. Kept trying to click on Emo Teens.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Is it?

How often do you tell a person they are a male or they are a female?
How has it actually changed your life?
Absolutely. I need to tread water if I use the obvious he or she and then someone gets offended because I (correctly) pick their gender. It will change the lives of my children, nieces and nephews because they don't understand it will grow up in a world where basic simple correct things around sex become more vague and confusing. I'm scared of the inevitable day when freaks start entering female toilets and changerooms because they "identify" as females and people are too scared to challenge them.

Finally I am scared of the gateway that allowing people to "choose" to deny biological science will have a flow on effect. What's next to identify or not identify as? Where is the line drawn?
 
Absolutely. I need to tread water if I use the obvious he or she and then someone gets offended because I (correctly) pick their gender. It will change the lives of my children, nieces and nephews because they don't understand it will grow up in a world where basic simple correct things around sex become more vague and confusing. I'm scared of the inevitable day when freaks start entering female toilets and changerooms because they "identify" as females and people are too scared to challenge them.

Finally I am scared of the gateway that allowing people to "choose" to deny biological science will have a flow on effect. What's next to identify or not identify as? Where is the line drawn?
Sure, there is a lot to say about biological sciences, and the ever increasing rejection of science.

But it's a complicated issue.

Do you think your fear for yourself and your family might cloud your judgement?
How serious do you think these issues really are?


In terms of rejecting science, I'd say the climate change debate is much more serious and threatening to you and your family. But it doesn't seem to create the same feelings for people, as transgenderism does.
Anti-vax.
Flat Earth.

The reason to fear transgender people using the 'wrong' toilets and change-rooms... seems to be based on the idea that transgendered people are inherently dangerous. Which I don't believe is a fair view.



If you refer to someone as "he", and they ask you to refer to them as "she", does it bother you that much? Is it the principles of science that you're standing up for?

If someone has a difficult to pronounce name, and they correct you. Would you continue to pronounce it they way you want, or would you try to correct yourself?
 
Sad that we live in a world where calling a male a male and a female a female in reference to their biological sex is now not acceptable if someone chooses to say otherwise.
How much does it cost you to make that small gesture? If that's all it takes to make someones life a little brighter, why not oblige ffs.
 
Im glad I got 'This thread will eventually get outraged by Saved by the Bell reboot casting' in the sweep.

Anyway, the ranga from the Ship to Shore reboot made Hermes Andarkis take gender sensitivity training in the series opener, so nice funding Soros.
There was a chick in Ship to Shore I was nuts for ... Jodi something? Anyway I'm pretty sure Hermes Andakis was already trans.
 
Absolutely. I need to tread water if I use the obvious he or she and then someone gets offended because I (correctly) pick their gender. It will change the lives of my children, nieces and nephews because they don't understand it will grow up in a world where basic simple correct things around sex become more vague and confusing.
How will it change the lives of your children? Do you think it's infectious?
I'm scared of the inevitable day when freaks start entering female toilets and changerooms because they "identify" as females and people are too scared to challenge them.
I don't see that happening tbh.
Finally I am scared of the gateway that allowing people to "choose" to deny biological science will have a flow on effect. What's next to identify or not identify as? Where is the line drawn?
We already allow people to deny science on the basis of their religious belief with near impunity. Just look at our political leaders and Folau/Court.

The line has already been drawn so far in favor of the ignorant right that I'm not sure how things could get worse.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

The reason to fear transgender people using the 'wrong' toilets and change-rooms... seems to be based on the idea that transgendered people are inherently dangerous. Which I don't believe is a fair view.
Tbf, I don't think that's the main fear.

I don't like the idea of transgender (m2f) individuals using the ladies toilets for the same reasons I don't want others who were born male using the womens toilets. If I see objective evidence or logical rationale that contradicts my view, I'll gladly change with it.
 
Lots of kids got incorrectly diagnosed with ADD during the last psychology fad. This fad can do more harm.
How do you see it playing out? I think the threat is being massively overstated and easily countered.

If gender reassignment surgery was legally only available for those aged 18+, surely that's sufficient.
 
How do you see it playing out? I think the threat is being massively overstated and easily countered.

If gender reassignment surgery was legally only available for those aged 18+, surely that's sufficient.
We don't fully know what harm puberty blockers and the like can do, but the preliminary evidence isn't promising.
 
There are black teens. White teens. Gay teens. Trans teens. Straight teens. Metalhead teens. Techno teens. Emo teens. Sporty teens. Nerdy teens. It's the real world. These are the people in our neighbourhood.

TV is about ratings. It's not a public service. Financial realities of catering to a teen-trans audience that make up less than .01% of the overall population is bad business.
 
Sure, there is a lot to say about biological sciences, and the ever increasing rejection of science.

But it's a complicated issue.

Do you think your fear for yourself and your family might cloud your judgement?
How serious do you think these issues really are?
That remains to be seen, but I would say they will become more significant over time, that's generally how things begin, smaller issues that escalate over time. My judgement isn't clouded, I have my views, because they differ to others why are my views considered clouded? To be deliberately provocative here, you are asking if I am clouded but a male believing he is a female and choosing not to be a male is not considered to have clouded judgement?

In terms of rejecting science, I'd say the climate change debate is much more serious and threatening to you and your family. But it doesn't seem to create the same feelings for people, as transgenderism does.
Anti-vax.
Flat Earth.
You are putting out several different topical issues that each have a different response and discussion points, so I can't lump them all together.
Climate change: Sure I agree, it's a big issue. I'm not sure what else you want me to say? I believe global leaders can do and need to do more, but I am confident they are starting to, or will start to, and I'm a big believer in cleaner, renewable energy, recycling, protecting the earth and wildlife, etc. Just because that is a big issue doesn't mean the transgender topic doesn't warrant opinion or discussion.

Anti-vax: People are ignoring evidence, and they are putting others at risk by refusing to vaccinate. They are not very intelligent I would say. What else do you want me to say?

The reason to fear transgender people using the 'wrong' toilets and change-rooms... seems to be based on the idea that transgendered people are inherently dangerous. Which I don't believe is a fair view.
I have no doubt that the vast, vast majority of transgender people are in the average socially functioning people who are not any more or less dangerous than others. I also believe that there will be a small few who will abuse this situation, and use these circumstances to do horrible things. Is it over reactionary? Probably, until it inevitably happens and someone gets hurt or violated.

If you refer to someone as "he", and they ask you to refer to them as "she", does it bother you that much? Is it the principles of science that you're standing up for?
Principles of science? Absolutely, to a degree. If said person is a he, and asks to be called a she, why would I? If they asked to be called a King, why would I? If they asked to be called a doctor, why would I? If they asked to be called a dolphin, why would I? Why should I deny the principles of science because someone else wants to deny them? In all honesty, I probably would just not refer to them as a pronoun at all, I would refer to them by name and have no issues with it, but I shouldn't be told to use pronouns that don't apply, and punished if I don't.

If someone has a difficult to pronounce name, and they correct you. Would you continue to pronounce it they way you want, or would you try to correct yourself?
What? That's a completely different example and in no way comparable. Firstly, a name is a completely choice based identifier. There is no biological basis for a name. If I had a pronunciation issue I would try to correct it, I have no reason not to, I am not denying any personal values, views or scientific principles by calling someone "Jerry" instead of the correct "Gerry".
 
Last edited:
How much does it cost you to make that small gesture? If that's all it takes to make someones life a little brighter, why not oblige ffs.
There are a lot of things I could say that might make someones day brighter, and I might choose to in some cases. But I shouldn't have to or be punished if I don't, particularly when my views are backed by the science of human biology. In all honesty I would likely just refer to the individual by name.
 
There are a lot of things I could say that might make someones day brighter, and I might choose to in some cases. But I shouldn't have to or be punished if I don't, particularly when my views are backed by the science of human biology. In all honesty I would likely just refer to the individual by name.
Who's punishing you?
 
How will it change the lives of your children? Do you think it's infectious?
No need to be patronizing. You know quite well how social standards can change the lives of societies, communities and individuals. I've already given a few examples of how it might change their lives in future, and there would be more.

I don't see that happening tbh.
Sure okay you don't. But it will, at some point, and everyone will say it won't ever happen until it does. There are unfortunately a lot of messed up people in the world in regards to sexual violators, or perves, pedophiles etc. While 99% of the trans community probably aren't these things, some messed up people will use this situation to do those things. How would you feel if it was your child/relative that was the eventually victim?


We already allow people to deny science on the basis of their religious belief with near impunity. Just look at our political leaders and Folau/Court.
Some people do sure, why do I need to?


The line has already been drawn so far in favor of the ignorant right that I'm not sure how things could get worse.
I'm not sure what you are trying to say here? I have political views that align with the right, the left, and in between depending on what the topic is.
 
Who's punishing you?
Stop looking at the individual and look at the community issue. There is a bloke called Jordan Peterson who was in an entire battle with his employer because he didn't want to be mandated to use pronouns even though he said he would. These issues will likely only become more frequent over time in this PC compliant world. I stated earlier, I now need to be careful if I use correct pronouns and someone gets offended. It's a slippery slope.
 
That remains to be seen, but I would say they will become more significant over time, that's generally how things begin, smaller issues that escalate over time. My judgement isn't clouded, I have my views, because they differ to others why are my views considered clouded? To be deliberately provocative here, you are asking if I am clouded but a male believing he is a female and choosing not to be a male is not considered to have clouded judgement?
Not trying to be provacative at all.

I mean that as you pointed out you're scared for your family. Fear clouds judgement.
I'm trying to establish where this fear really comes from. Experience, media, the unknown.

You are putting out several different topical issues that each have a different response and discussion points, so I can't lump them all together.
Climate change: Sure I agree, it's a big issue. I'm not sure what else you want me to say? I believe global leaders can do and need to do more, but I am confident they are starting to, or will start to, and I'm a big believer in cleaner, renewable energy, recycling, protecting the earth and wildlife, etc. Just because that is a big issue doesn't mean the transgender topic doesn't warrant opinion or discussion.
Thanks for your response, and I think I agree with most of that.

I didn't mean to get your opinion on them, I was pointing out the rejection of science that we are seeing around the world.
And comparing it to the pushback on transgenderism.

I think transgenderism needs more of a discussion. More of an understanding. And a lot more answers.
My concern is the small handful of transphobes and extremists who shut down the discussion, generating division and fear.
Most people are genuinely concerned or supportive.

I have no doubt that the vast, vast majority of transgender people are in the average socially functioning people who are not any more or less dangerous than others. I also believe that there will be a small few who will abuse this situation, and use these circumstances to do horrible things. Is it over reactionary? Probably, until it inevitably happens and someone gets hurt or violated.
Absolutely. No demographic is perfect. And we need to be careful of the actual predators.

There was an article linked earlier of a man charged with child abuse who was pushing for same sex bathrooms.
These people exist and there is no denying it.
But if we start to condemn and fear entire demographics based on a small few, we are doing them and ourselves a disservice.

Principles of science? Absolutely, to a degree. If said person is a he, and asks to be called a she, why would I? If they asked to be called a King, why would I? If they asked to be called a doctor, why would I? If they asked to be called a dolphin, why would I?
That's an interesting concept.
If someone trying to look down on me, asked me to refer to them as King Bob, I'd not do it out of principle.
If someone that I feel sorry for, or look down on in some way asked me to refer to them as King Bob, I'd probably do it.

Do I look down or feel sorry for transsexuals? Is that why I'm happy to use their preferred pronouns. I don't think so, but I wonder if it plays a part.

I probably would just not refer to them as a pronoun at all, I would refer to them by name and have no issues with it, but I shouldn't be told to use pronouns that don't apply, and punished if I don't.
I like that. That's a very logical way to go about it, and it seems it would satisfy most people.
You definitely shouldn't be punished for it.
Unless you go out of your way to make it an issue.

But if someone in the workplace demands you refer to them by their preferred gender, rather than by their preferred name... I'd say in most cases that they are the ones causing the issue, and they should get in trouble for it.

What? That's a completely different example and in no way comparable. Firstly, a name is a completely choice based identifier. There is no biological basis for a name. If I had a pronunciation issue I would try to correct it, I have no reason not to, I am not denying any personal values, views or scientific principles by calling someone "Jerry" instead of the correct "Gerry".
Good point.


And the personal values. If you believe the person is a she, and they want you to call them a he. There are now two different personal values that are clashing. I think yours is the best solution, just refer to them by name.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top