I've read some of the words.Have you read a single word I've written?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I've read some of the words.Have you read a single word I've written?
The fact a trial was run and successful 400 treated none got sick compared to 258 in the placebo group is already ahead of a vax with 90% efficacy and kills people. Interesting it hasn't been explored more.
I'm sure you know all about it though.
" it has shown action to reduce viral RNA replication 5000 fold within the first 48 hours..."I just provided a fact check on your mate's study. Keep avoiding the substance, as people like you like to roll.
Christ mate, chill out." it has shown action to reduce viral RNA replication 5000 fold within the first 48 hours..."
Here's a fact.
The fact you have no idea what the above means without googling it right this minute shows you shouldn't even be in this conversation. Crawl back in your cave primate.
It is fact people have died from taking it or are suffering side effects.
And so you can't blame a person for taking an intellectual leap and proposing they idea that the cure had to be in the hands of corporations/ drug companies as a money making venture.
Chief, it's only the truth. Blinkers off.Christ mate, chill out.
Pro vaxxer or anti vaxxer is completely irrelevant to the crux of the conversation.Who has died? I'm by no means a pro- vaxxer, but what are these deaths?
Taking an 'intellectual leap' and 'proposing the idea' is very different from screaming at people that they're fools and declaring that the government are killing people for not giving them a drug that hasn't yet been confirmed to be safe or even actually work.
Pro vaxxer or anti vaxxer is completely irrelevant to the crux of the conversation.
Some 'News' has reported deaths, some has denied it.
Screaming, who raised deadshits?
Ivermectin not safe? It's won a nobel prize mate. It's perfectly safe and works very effectively.
Your lack of knowledge is really showing considering you just ignored some massively important information about remdesivir and ivermectins ability to obliterate infections. Way out of your depth. Hospitals and Doctors in South America are using it as a 'Treatment Method' right now and have been for quite some time.
Not safe says you, your a bloody laugh. But sure, keep arguing pointless semantics Einstein
Do you have a link to the data? It’s a bit difficult to believe that of the 11m people in Belgium, 21m are dead.
a person who has done nothing but present facts
in vitro results are often misleading and cannot be assumed to be transferable to in vivo potential for a number of reasons. this research published in The Lancet summarises some of that point:I'm sure the 150$US a pop the pfizer vax sells for has nothing to do with the changes in reporting on SOME news outlets on the reported deaths.
Ivermectin really has the potential to be the wonder drug since there is another study where it has shown action to reduce viral RNA replication 5000 fold within the first 48 hours...what it needs is the approval of concerned medical groups like the NIH/FDA for it to pass and undergo immediate phase 3 clinical trials with an acceptable number of participants in a study. It didnt win a Nobel prize for nothing. The vaccines haven't even passed phase 3 clinical trials yet but dunces everywhere are hailing them the greatest thing ever.
The mind boggling amount of dollars involved is probably why it hasn't been done. Congress are more invested in vax than Ivermectin. If you still deny it's effectiveness then maybe it's time to don you bitterly disappointed cap and conclude our little interaction?
In spite of its partial antiviral properties, ivermectin received limited early attention in Europe or the US as a potential drug to be repurposed against COVID-19. This was largely based on one pharmacokinetic model stressing the inability of currently approved oral doses to reach lung tissue levels at the antiviral concentrations described by Caly et al., [21] even if other, peer-reviewed models predict up to 10-fold accumulation of ivermectin in target tissue [22]. There are additional reasons to avoid direct inferences from the results of in vitro experiments or pharmacokinetic models, these include the potential role of ivermectin metabolites, the potential immunomodulatory role of the drug, and questions about the virus/cell ratios and appropriateness of the Vero cellular lines used in the cultures [23].
How did this play out?Four more hours of hopium. I've been watching Mustang Medic on Youtube. He was live streaming across the road from the fence now erected around the Capitol building. It was around 5 in the morning he was filming. What he's filming is people moving in and buses. Bus after bus. Are they rent a crowd? He's called the buses as empty, different from when they bused people in for the storming. You have to wonder why empty buses are rocking up. This is a fact because you can see it for yourself. If you watch the video, I recommend you mute it because you won't like his angle. You'd have to come up with your own interpretation for why such a thing is going on. He reckons it's because indictments are to laid and the treasonous to be rounded up. That's what the buses are for, to take away away. It is a military coup and will remain so until the trials are over and punishments laid. Then American will have another election. Around March maybe. Hopium. A few more sweet hours.
I read an article the other day that said that vaccines are the least most profitable thing a pharmaceutical company produces. Apparently only around 2-3% profit - compared to the massive profits they get from the treatment drugs they produce for diseases.I'm sure the 150$US a pop the pfizer vax sells for has nothing to do with the changes in reporting on SOME news outlets on the reported deaths.
Ivermectin really has the potential to be the wonder drug since there is another study where it has shown action to reduce viral RNA replication 5000 fold within the first 48 hours...what it needs is the approval of concerned medical groups like the NIH/FDA for it to pass and undergo immediate phase 3 clinical trials with an acceptable number of participants in a study. It didnt win a Nobel prize for nothing. The vaccines haven't even passed phase 3 clinical trials yet but dunces everywhere are hailing them the greatest thing ever.
The mind boggling amount of dollars involved is probably why it hasn't been done. Congress are more invested in vax than Ivermectin. If you still deny it's effectiveness then maybe it's time to don you bitterly disappointed cap and conclude our little interaction?
What frog s**t.I see the panic has well and truly set in. Pollies like this. The human brain is an odd, glitchy machine that is influenced in all sorts of weird ways you never thought of. This is why politicians and salespeople can trick you into going along with them, just by toying with the words they use. Science is just now catching up to them, and has found that repeating there opinion makes people believe it unconditionally, no matter how stupid it is. If a message is repeated enough times, others will begin to accept it as a commonly held belief in the group. Doubly so if you are a Victorian!
I see the panic has well and truly set in. Pollies like this. The human brain is an odd, glitchy machine that is influenced in all sorts of weird ways you never thought of. This is why politicians and salespeople can trick you into going along with them, just by toying with the words they use. Science is just now catching up to them, and has found that repeating there opinion makes people believe it unconditionally, no matter how stupid it is. If a message is repeated enough times, others will begin to accept it as a commonly held belief in the group. Doubly so if you are a Victorian!
Science is also well aware of the "sheeple"...Science is just now catching up to the impact of rhetoric on people. Bwahahahaha. This stuff was well known long before there even was a scientific method, by oh at least 2000 years. Probably a lot longer but we have very limited written records from before then.
I suppose one positive in all this, is that people are more aware that governments, media, religious leaders etc. can be, and often are - full of s**t.Science is just now catching up to the impact of rhetoric on people. Bwahahahaha. This stuff was well known long before there even was a scientific method, by oh at least 2000 years. Probably a lot longer but we have very limited written records from before then.
Everyone is, it's not a new phenomenon.Science is also well aware of the "sheeple"...