Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I don’t get the “other tent” bit.
..........or towards finding some meaning in the value your life brings to others.
I see, sort of. I think that's a false dichotomy. And society has always had these types of choices.Society is currently negotiating between the two ideals of living your best life. They lean either into the nihilistic and hedonistic satiation of function or towards finding some meaning in the value your life brings to others.
Both have their perks and serious cons. I think it would be fair to say that the immediate gratification and ultimate pointlessness of living for later is winning by a long way.
They have, and if you subscribe to the concept that a religion is simply a cult that offered a community value then it shouldn't surprise you that the long lasting social paradigms aren't the radically progressive in modern terms and promote the strength of self for the group, rather than the exploration of the self for the benefit of the self.I see, sort of. I think that's a false dichotomy. And society has always had these types of choices.
And what, exactly, does "failing at life" entail?Anyone who isn't living by this criteria is ultimately failing at life (of course, having fun in the process is obviously preferable).
It's the only "big picture" there is.
There was one pop-up at the very beginning which shows how much time you invested in it.Too long and too many crappy pop up ads on that trashy site. Cliff notes pls.
It's common sense that most applications would ensure that they have a sufficient amount of evidence (based on the threshold set in prior cases) before incurring the costs and efforts of a Family Court application.Sure, a new law that creates nothing but 100% effectiveness with no instances of insufficient evidence.
The trans kids are responsible for shifting electoral boundaries now?People can get away with murder in the same court system, but no, gender dysphoria is an absolute pearl of a process that couldn't possibly have any political gerrymandering.
How convenient.
You heard it here first, folks.It's common sense that most applications would ensure that they have a sufficient amount of evidence (based on the threshold set in prior cases) before incurring the costs and efforts of a Family Court application.
The trans kids are responsible for shifting electoral boundaries now?
What you see as some political/ideological conspiracy theory, is really just the courts rejecting your counter-arguments as being uneducated bunkum.
As they should. As they do. And as they will continue to do.
Right up until the generation of children who needed to be protected launch legal action against those who had a duty of care over them and then the courts will side with them then too.
Whenever somebody makes a long altering decision, care should given to the individual.Protected from what?
I completely agree, I take particular issue with transgender activists advocating for hormone blockers for children suggesting it is totally reversible and gives them time to figure themselves out when in reality it is a permanent mutilation of their adult lives as complete sexual and potentially reproductive people.Whenever somebody makes a long altering decision, care should given to the individual.
Issues related to the change need to be fully explored.
Personally I believe in the positive self regard model and let the individual decide.
Building up the individual to see the underlining reasons for the change.
My strong belief is that some people will benefit to gender reassignment and others it won’t and will be harmful.
So... this is very vague.Whenever somebody makes a long altering decision, care should given to the individual.
Issues related to the change need to be fully explored.
Personally I believe in the positive self regard model and let the individual decide.
Building up the individual to see the underlining reasons for the change.
My strong belief is that some people will benefit to gender reassignment and others it won’t and will be harmful.
No it’s not.So... this is very vague.
Care for people? Help them make the right decision? Is that what you mean?
Is that not happening?
The rate of de-transitioning suggests it is not happening.So... this is very vague.
Care for people? Help them make the right decision? Is that what you mean?
Is that not happening?
I'm happy for someone to be held accountable for being wrong if that goes both ways.Who should be liable when I have to look up laws that turn out not to say what a poster thinks they said?
No. It is partially reversible - and for Gender Dysmorphic adolescents - it is more reversible than allowing puberty to proceed either with natural hormones or gender-affirming hormones. Anyone who tells you otherwise doesn't understand the science.I completely agree, I take particular issue with transgender activists advocating for hormone blockers for children suggesting it is totally reversible and gives them time to figure themselves out when in reality it is a permanent mutilation of their adult lives as complete sexual and potentially reproductive people.
You'll be pleased to know that we don't allow children to make such a decision. That decision must be made by the parents and/or the Family Court - who are capable of understanding the long-term implications of such a decision.I think the general rule should be that if we don't let children make decisions about things because they aren't capable of either understanding the path to it or the path beyond the choice - then we should apply that consistently, especially when it's regarding the rest of their lives.
No. It is partially reversible - and for Gender Dysmorphic adolescents - it is more reversible than allowing puberty to proceed either with natural hormones or gender-affirming hormones. Anyone who tells you otherwise doesn't understand the science.
Endocrine Treatment of Gender-Dysphoric/Gender-Incongruent Persons: An Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline
You'll be pleased to know that we don't allow children to make such a decision. That decision must be made by the parents and/or the Family Court - who are capable of understanding the long-term implications of such a decision.