You reckon he took less money to go to the Dogs?
Brad Hill: Overweight, slow and a tad soft
- Thread starter little hawk gmf
- Start date
- Tagged users None
- May 3, 2007
- 37,296
- 21,627
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
- Other Teams
- Man City, Valencia, Lazio, Panthers
Oh I wasn't talking about this thread. I am talking about the abuse he copped on Instagram around a week ago
Perhaps not less overall, just less per season, according to Twomey. If there is another source I haven't seen it, don't really remember much details from the 2019 trade period.
Unintelligent comment.
Had the most pressure acts for us for the game, which is no mean feat for someone playing off HB. So it wasn’t just about the flash stuff.
Second time this year he’s topped that stat for us.
Second time this year he’s topped that stat for us.
I’d suggest perhaps saints fans hold off from quoting everyone in here when you beat up on a bottom 4 team. Actually don’t mind your club at all but Hill so far has been a rubbish investment for what you paid and needs to play like he did today most weeks.
He had a lot more influence on the result of the game than the likes of Worpel (11 turnovers), Mitchell and Scrimshaw, especially as he did so much of his best work in the first half, to help put us out to a commanding lead.
Had 16 of his disposals in that half, when the game was there to be won, and at one stage in the 2nd half they said he was going at an exceptional 93% efficiency by foot.
There are disposals and then there are the sort of disposals Hill was having. The sort that cut teams up.
Verdun
Premium Gold
- Oct 16, 2011
- 4,706
- 8,219
- AFL Club
- St Kilda
I''d suggest Dees supporters hold of commenting early in the season as they usually do.
You said he played his first good game of the year which is complete bullshit.
Stop posting shit.
half of us expect to lose tomorrow.Apologies, second good game of the season.
Bullshit yet again. You obviously didn’t watch round 1. Save your uneducated opinions for Melbourne games. You won’t look so stupid.
Apologies, second good game of the season.
Unfortunately you don’t get to play the Hawks every week.
For $900k a season you’d want a game like today 3 out of every 4 games.
Weird flex considering we beat you in a final what, 6 months ago?
Well Melbourne have happily accepted 1 in 12 for McDonald for 2 years. So Hill’s going ok.
- Apr 5, 2016
- 7,515
- 16,891
- AFL Club
- Western Bulldogs
- Other Teams
- Boston Celtics
You did. The natural progression would be that you’d follow it up with an even more impressive following season, right? I’m glad that’s happening.
Like after winning a flag?
Yes, because improvement in football is linear. Especially when you’re missing 9 of your best 22 to start the season and play 3 of the top 5 teams in the first 6 weeks.
- Apr 5, 2016
- 7,515
- 16,891
- AFL Club
- Western Bulldogs
- Other Teams
- Boston Celtics
See once you’ve won the premiership you literally can’t go higher than that. I wouldn’t expect you to know anything about that.
- Apr 5, 2016
- 7,515
- 16,891
- AFL Club
- Western Bulldogs
- Other Teams
- Boston Celtics
Ah yes. Saints are the only team with injuries. Silly me.
9 of our best 22. Up until this week you’ve been missing about 1. If you don’t see a monumental difference there you’re blind as well as stupid.
If you’d had the equivalent outs to start the season you’d have started 0-2, there’s nothing surer. Then who knows what would have happened from there.
- Apr 5, 2016
- 7,515
- 16,891
- AFL Club
- Western Bulldogs
- Other Teams
- Boston Celtics
