Player Watch Paul Seedsman - Retired

Remove this Banner Ad

MarcusP2 said:
And Fog and Tex. 2 forwards and 3 other players that can pot goals from 50 is a pretty good state to be in.

On Pixel 5 using BigFooty.com mobile app
Click to expand...

Remember way back when we had Chris Knights banging goals from the 50? It wasn’t so common back then and we were all like holy cow!!

Now it’s a real point of difference and a huge weapon for a side to have - even better having multiple options

Looking forward to it!
 
Bay62 said:
Remember way back when we had Chris Knights banging goals from the 50? It wasn’t so common back then and we were all like holy cow!!

Now it’s a real point of difference and a huge weapon for a side to have - even better having multiple options

Looking forward to it!
Click to expand...

If only our coach didn’t lament non-deep entries and encouraged the use of those weapons and the spreading of opposition defences.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Bay62 said:
Remember way back when we had Chris Knights banging goals from the 50? It wasn’t so common back then and we were all like holy cow!!

Now it’s a real point of difference and a huge weapon for a side to have - even better having multiple options

Looking forward to it!
Click to expand...

Wish we would do it more often - it then creates doubt in the defenders.

Is it going to be a short pass to a leading forward (which most of our side struggles to execute) or will the ball be sailing over our heads?

PS : I’m agreeing with 1970Crow. Must be time for 🥃 or 🍷.
 
Was looking forward to the day Seedsman, Smith and Milera would all be together on the park, full guns blazing. In 6 and a half seasons I’m not sure it’s happened.

Then after Seedsman’s year last year, if only he was fit with Dawson now in the side.

Maybe 2023? Fingers crossed for that outcome and for his health moving forward.
 
1990crow said:
Surely they don’t think he could play again.
Anyone able to post content?
Click to expand...
There isn't anything there about him playing again

Just that his symptoms are improving under the treatment, getting more sleep, better moods. Still a few headaches.

The article is mostly about cannabis treatment, the doctor is pushing the AFL to explore the use of it with concussions
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Drugs Are Bad Mackay? said:
There isn't anything there about him playing again

Just that his symptoms are improving under the treatment, getting more sleep, better moods. Still a few headaches.

The article is mostly about cannabis treatment, the doctor is pushing the AFL to explore the use of it with concussions
Click to expand...
Would be interesting to see if medicinal cannabis may be used for concussions and other chronic sports-related injuries. Then if a player recovers, would they be legally allowed to play during the season, following cannabis use?
 
John Who said:
Would be interesting to see if medicinal cannabis may be used for concussions and other chronic sports-related injuries. Then if a player recovers, would they be legally allowed to play during the season, following cannabis use?
Click to expand...

Medical cannabis in Australia must comply with Therapeutic Goods Order No. 93 (TGO 93), the Australian Standard, which specifically limits content of aflatoxins and ochratoxin A15. Furthermore, medical cannabis is subject to TGO 77 which limits the total microbial count and requires absence of Salmonella, E. coli and S. aureus in certain tests16. The Therapeutic Goods Administration also expects medical cannabis producers to determine the risk to their product from microorganisms not specifically mentioned in their guidelines17.​


Check the levels Aflatoxin and Ochratoxin also submit to baseline studies
 
John Who said:
Would be interesting to see if medicinal cannabis may be used for concussions and other chronic sports-related injuries. Then if a player recovers, would they be legally allowed to play during the season, following cannabis use?
Click to expand...
I thought you were a doctor... ;)
 
GreyCrow said:

Medical cannabis in Australia must comply with Therapeutic Goods Order No. 93 (TGO 93), the Australian Standard, which specifically limits content of aflatoxins and ochratoxin A15. Furthermore, medical cannabis is subject to TGO 77 which limits the total microbial count and requires absence of Salmonella, E. coli and S. aureus in certain tests16. The Therapeutic Goods Administration also expects medical cannabis producers to determine the risk to their product from microorganisms not specifically mentioned in their guidelines17.​


Check the levels Aflatoxin and Ochratoxin also submit to baseline studies
Click to expand...
I don’t think it’s necessarily a simple answer. I can imagine 6 months of therapy would be adjudicated differently to a 6-day course, for example.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top