Remove this Banner Ad

AFL Dream Team 2007

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Get real. He was batter than Frawley.

Yes his foot skills weren't quite up to par today but he did a few brilliant things in close.

Was one of those brilliant things you were talking about his unconstested dropped mark which cost them a goal?
He was horrible today.
I could comfortably name six beter backmen than him from Melbourne.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Was one of those brilliant things you were talking about his unconstested dropped mark which cost them a goal?
He was horrible today.
I could comfortably name six beter backmen than him from Melbourne.
One major mistake. Big deal.

What about Thomas's handball straight to Brock McLean which led to a goal?

Everyone makes mistakes.
 
Those scoring 1900+, you people obviously have no idea.

1600 odd from me.
Youre a tosser.
Just because you suck at DT and score 1600. You are obviously the one who has no idea.

I recall theone5 saying the exact same thing as you at the start of the season, and he is pathetic at this game. You are right up there with him :rolleyes:
 
One major mistake. Big deal.

What about Thomas's handball straight to Brock McLean which led to a goal?

Everyone makes mistakes.

One mistake?
He made plenty more mistakes than one today.
Mistimed some of his jumps, failed to hold onto his tackles and turned the ball over a few times with his poor foot skills.
 
no chance. why would they drop him? they wont make finals so they will develop him as much as possible.

That's not in Neale's best interests though. If he wants to keep his job he needs to get as many wins as possible to get another contract. Playing someone who isn't currently contributing enough to Melbourne's 22 simply isn't the best way to go about this, even if it may be in the best interests of the Melbourne footy club long-term, it isn't in the coaches best interest, and he's the one picking the team. If he thinks someone like Whelan/Bizzel or whoever will contribute more to the side in the coming weeks, they will get a run regardless of age and potential.
 
Youre a tosser.
Just because you suck at DT and score 1600. You are obviously the one who has no idea.

I recall theone5 saying the exact same thing as you at the start of the season, and he is pathetic at this game. You are right up there with him :rolleyes:

Haha.
Another immature call from an inexperienced rookie at this game.

By the way, i never said anything like that at the start of the season.
Maybe you are still sour from your one-point loss on Friday night. :rolleyes:
 
Youre a tosser.
Just because you suck at DT and score 1600. You are obviously the one who has no idea.

I recall theone5 saying the exact same thing as you at the start of the season, and he is pathetic at this game. You are right up there with him :rolleyes:
Lol champ what's your ranking?

This is the only week I've scored below 1700. My ranking was 499 with 12 trades and 120k+. Yes, no idea. :D
 
That's not in Neale's best interests though. If he wants to keep his job he needs to get as many wins as possible to get another contract. Playing someone who isn't currently contributing enough to Melbourne's 22 simply isn't the best way to go about this, even if it may be in the best interests of the Melbourne footy club long-term, it isn't in the coaches best interest, and he's the one picking the team. If he thinks someone like Whelan/Bizzel or whoever will contribute more to the side in the coming weeks, they will get a run regardless of age and potential.

Also, the players who he was competing with for a spot in the team, such as C.Bizzell, B.Holland and D.Ward all dominated today.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

just on something here. my forward ressies are kosi and hughes and my back ressies and xellis and riggio. now i want to bring heath shaw in but need to find cash somewhere....so would you downgrade kosi or hughes for one of gray/westoff?? if i downgrade kosi i can upgrade xellis to shaw and move smith to the bench. what do ya's think ?

oh and also is this the week to get shaw...or next week. because his BE is 109 or something and plays the swans next week.
 
I'll be keeping a close eye on Petterd - he's my only centre reserve now since I downgraded my other draftee last week. I have solid reserves everywhere else (Bock, Darcy, NAblett) but if Melbourne are going to drop him I'll need to make another trade. My only trade this week will be bringing in someone like Lockyer to complete my backline, there don't seem to be many quality forwards so I'll just stick with what I've got.
 
Those scoring 1900+, you people obviously have no idea.
1600 odd from me.

I recall theone5 saying the exact same thing as you at the start of the season, and he is pathetic at this game. You are right up there with him :rolleyes:

Haha.
Another immature call from an inexperienced rookie at this game.
By the way, i never said anything like that at the start of the season.
Remember typing this tripe:
http://www.bigfooty.com/forum/showpost.php?p=7096593&postcount=7119

Youre an absolute bell end. Time and time again you make a fool out of yourself.

BTW, what is the inexperienced rookie comment meant to mean? You have had about 7 seasons at this game and you still suck.
 
Is it worth having 5 trades left with Bartel and Stanton and have to play a man down for a week or have 6 trades left with West and Stanton and not have to play a man down. Is the extra trade worth it??
Plz any thoughts??????
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

just on something here. my forward ressies are kosi and hughes and my back ressies and xellis and riggio. now i want to bring heath shaw in but need to find cash somewhere....so would you downgrade kosi or hughes for one of gray/westoff?? if i downgrade kosi i can upgrade xellis to shaw and move smith to the bench. what do ya's think ?

oh and also is this the week to get shaw...or next week. because his BE is 109 or something and plays the swans next week.

I wouldn't downgrade kosi, he may be starting 22 material if he recovers his best form - definitely worth the risk for me since I have quality forward emergencies. I think ellis to shaw is a great trade but try and find the cash somewhere else.
 
Is it worth having 5 trades left with Bartel and Stanton and have to play a man down for a week or have 6 trades left with West and Stanton and not have to play a man down. Is the extra trade worth it??
Plz any thoughts??????

Do you have a centre who can score some points for that week or are you really a man down? What exactly is the trade you're making, West for Bartel or something?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top