List Mgmt. 2024 List Management 📃

[macky99]

Just guessing here

Dow for a future 3rd

Fisher + future 3rd for a future 2nd

Hollands for a future 2nd

Pretty certain Austin will be targeting picks in this upcoming draft, particularly not having a 2nd or 3rd round selection right now.

 

[swuzzlebubble]

Pure guesswork....

This isn't just regular guesswork; it's pure, top-of-the-line guesswork. The best.

 

[Arr0w]

Pretty certain Austin will be targeting picks in this upcoming draft, particularly not having a 2nd or 3rd round selection right now.

Possible, but we still need picks for next year's campo boys

Saints will back themselves to finish higher, same us North, so both those clubs will want to use future picks

 

[macky99]

Possible, but we still need picks for next year's campo boys

Saints will back themselves to finish higher, same us North, so both those clubs will want to use future picks

There will be teams around us working to improve their lists for next year, getting into this year's draft with at least 3 picks would seem to make sense, unless we are planning to use next year's F1st.

 

[swuzzlebubble]

Pretty certain Austin will be targeting picks in this upcoming draft, particularly not having a 2nd or 3rd round selection right now.

For this reason I like Fisher + 16 for 14 and 40.
Fills that gap and gives a slight bump to our first pick.

 

[swuzzlebubble]

Josh Gabelich
@JoshGabelich
·
8m
Gold Coast key forward Chris Burgess

21

Chris Burgess

Age

30

Ht

193cm

Wt

97kg

Pos.

Fwd

Career

Season

Last 5

D

8.2

2star

K

3.9

2star

HB

4.3

3star

M

2.7

3star

T

1.6

4star

G

0.3

3star

No current season stats available

D

6.6

2star

K

3.8

2star

HB

2.8

3star

M

2.6

3star

T

2.4

4star

G

0.4

3star

has informed the Suns he wants to move to the Adelaide Crows. Won the past two 'Frosty' Miller Medals in the VFL. More on
@AFLcomau

 

[Arr0w]

There will be teams around us working to improve their lists for next year, getting into this year's draft with at least 3 picks would seem to make sense, unless we are planning to use next year's F1st.

Depends how we rate the 2nd round + of this draft and what points we may need for next year

We could always trade into this year on draft night like last year

 

[bluesDeluxe]

Possible, but we still need picks for next year's campo boys

Saints will back themselves to finish higher, same us North, so both those clubs will want to use future picks

We can get picks next year from '25 if needed. Better to strengthen this year's draft hand.

 

[Ash24]

We can get picks next year from '25 if needed. Better to strengthen this year's draft hand.

You can use picks from '25, but then you're continuously playing catch up. When you're a club like us and consistently active in the draft/trades, you are going to have to sacrifice it for a more quiet off-season.

I'd much rather we stay low key this year, get the Campo twins next year, and keep our entire set of picks for 2025 to go big again.

 

[Soapy V]

Dow will go to St Kilda on a 3 year deal

Possible for Pick 31 and we give pick 39 (received for Fisher) back

We want solid some picks this year

 

[BrisbaneCFC]

Long term I don’t think Weitering alongside a bunch of tweeners (Gov, Marchy, Kemp) is enough.

I think we really need to persist with one of Young or Durdin at full back. Or go and recruit one. Weitering is versatile enough to play at CHB and playing on the 2nd tall should in theory make him better.

S.Durdin, Weitering, McGovern for me. Marchbank depth.

 

[Michael Jezz]

Dow will go to St Kilda on a 3 year deal

Possible for Pick 31 and we give pick 39 (received for Fisher) back

We want solid some picks this year

31 is not a solid pick when it ends up as 37

 

[ShanDog]

31 is not a solid pick when it ends up as 37

From the father/son and academy selections? If so, this comes up every year. Disregard those picks. They effectively don't count. You haven't really dropped six places in the draft if those players were never on the table to be picked.

 

[agro]

31 is not a solid pick when it ends up as 37

Especially if it costs you Dow Fisher and 39.

 

[Soapy V]

31 is not a solid pick when it ends up as 37

I think it's Solid. Not great, Not good, just solid. Also depends then what we use it for? If its Hollands then I call it very solid and a lot of very good players have been picked up around that mark. Lachie Neale was 58. What did we trade to get Acres? Very Solid

 

[Soapy V]

We can get picks next year from '25 if needed. Better to strengthen this year's draft hand.

Mid season trades and other things come into play as well now. Don't forget Tassie. So many variables

 

[The Bighouse]

I think it's Solid. Not great, Not good, just solid. Also depends then what we use it for? If its Hollands then I call it very solid and a lot of very good players have been picked up around that mark. Lachie Neale was 58. He is more than Solid

Pretty poor IMO & they’re talking one of the lowest draft intakes and a big drop-off in quality >8-10.
Granted we got bugger all for Setters last year but our dealing of players out needs to obtain better draft capital.

 

[Bletch]

Think 31 is poor if it's for both Dow and Fisher. Would want more.

 

[Soapy V]

For this reason I like Fisher + 16 for 14 and 40.
Fills that gap and gives a slight bump to our first pick.

I think 14 will be part of North's bid for 1 or 4

 

[Arr0w]

Think 31 is poor if it's for both Dow and Fisher. Would want more.

Values Dow as a mid 4th round, not sure I'd bother

 

[Stamos]

I think it's Solid. Not great, Not good, just solid. Also depends then what we use it for? If its Hollands then I call it very solid and a lot of very good players have been picked up around that mark. Lachie Neale was 58. What did we trade to get Acres? Very Solid

I'd be disappointed if both Fisher and Dow amounted to only Hollands.

 

[Soapy V]

Think 31 is poor if it's for both Dow and Fisher. Would want more.

I don't. Dow uncontracted and we want Fisher gone.

We got Acres for a Pick in the 50s. I actually think it's high given trades over last few years

 

[Soapy V]

I'd be disappointed if both Fisher and Dow amounted to only Hollands.

I don't. Clears money and allows us another pick. This is as much about SC and also number of picks NOT just where. We want spots for DFA, Rookies and Pre season

Happy to Bookmark this and revist when it happens

 

[Bletch]

I don't. Dow uncontracted and we want Fisher gone.

We got Acres for a Pick in the 50s. I actually think it's high given trades over last few years

And that's now seen as an incredibly poor trade by Freo.

Look, it's marginal - we're not talking first round picks. But I'd think that if we can engineer a result where we lose Dow and Fisher and gain Hollands and a pick around 40, it would be a reasonable result.

 

[Arr0w]

I don't. Clears money and allows us another pick. This is as much about SC and also number of picks NOT just where. We want spots for DFA, Rookies and Pre season

Happy to Bookmark this and revist when it happens

I thought you said our salary cap wasn't an issue, that we could even acquire Smith