Keeper Lg. BFDL - 2025 List Management Thread

[flaps]

Veto.

 

[Zim^zuM]

Because I woulve given Rivers for parker but was knocked back

 

[tenderwarrior]

Because I woulve given Rivers for parker but was knocked back

Jarrod Rivers too old

 

[tenderwarrior]

Trade confirmed

 

[Jordie_tackles]

Jarrod Rivers too old

40 and Retired

 

[flaps]

Jarrod Rivers too old

More of a River Stevens guy, myself.

 

[flaps]

More of a River Stevens guy, myself.

It'd also be great if he had a litter brother called Creek Stevens.

 

[deeman87]

Trade Alert, Wombats sending Banks and Allen to Rockford for a much needed defender in Mcvee and pick 29.

Wise Guy Sam
Rockford

 

[Zim^zuM]

Trade Alert, Wombats sending Banks and Allen to Rockford for a much needed defender in Mcvee and pick 29.

Wise Guy Sam
Rockford

About time this was posted.

Veto

 

[deeman87]

About time this was posted.

Veto

Only if I get to veto Ur Rioli trade

 

[Zim^zuM]

Only if I get to veto Ur Rioli trade

Too late.

Thanks on behalf of the league for making the premiers stronger

 

[deeman87]

Too late.

Thanks on behalf of the league for making the premiers stronger

I dont love trading with Rockford since I usually lose the trade and this trade is prob no different but hes the only person who put up a young defender and man do I need good defenders who are gonna stay a defender. What use is 9 gun fwds when I have like 2 donuts at defender.

 

[Zim^zuM]

I’ve got some defenders for u

 

[Jordie_tackles]

I’ve got some defenders for u

Could have said this when he asked a week ago?

 

[Rockford]

Where's everyone at with the idea of re-selecting guys that have been delisted? Have seen a few managers do it, it doesn't bother me with the new platform really letting us run our lists right up until the draft but I know we've been all over it in previous seasons and a lot more strict given the need to finalise lists. The only issue I could see with it is another manager makes plans in his draft strategy to pick up a delisted player, and then someone "re-lists" that player. I'm easy either way but one for discussion before it causes an issue.

 

[Deadly Darcy]

Where's everyone at with the idea of re-selecting guys that have been delisted? Have seen a few managers do it, it doesn't bother me with the new platform really letting us run our lists right up until the draft but I know we've been all over it in previous seasons and a lot more strict given the need to finalise lists. The only issue I could see with it is another manager makes plans in his draft strategy to pick up a delisted player, and then someone "re-lists" that player. I'm easy either way but one for discussion before it causes an issue.

We could set a date for delisting to be locked maybe? Agree it’s hard based on number of draft picks people are taking and some trades being 2 for 1 etc.

 

[Jordie_tackles]

Where's everyone at with the idea of re-selecting guys that have been delisted? Have seen a few managers do it, it doesn't bother me with the new platform really letting us run our lists right up until the draft but I know we've been all over it in previous seasons and a lot more strict given the need to finalise lists. The only issue I could see with it is another manager makes plans in his draft strategy to pick up a delisted player, and then someone "re-lists" that player. I'm easy either way but one for discussion before it causes an issue.

I don’t know how many examples there are, but I agree previously if it is delisted in this or the other thread it is official. Did flaps have an example of someone delisted then signed as like a injury replacement but got denied?

I think as of next year it is who ever is on your list when the draft starts or deadline on site then that is final?

 

[Zim^zuM]

Could have said this when he asked a week ago?

There's no rule that says he can only bring in one defender.

 

[Rockford]

I think for Flaps it was that someone was OOC with their club, he delisted them, then they got a supplemental spot and eventually a contract at another club. flaps would know.

 

[Zim^zuM]

Where's everyone at with the idea of re-selecting guys that have been delisted? Have seen a few managers do it, it doesn't bother me with the new platform really letting us run our lists right up until the draft but I know we've been all over it in previous seasons and a lot more strict given the need to finalise lists. The only issue I could see with it is another manager makes plans in his draft strategy to pick up a delisted player, and then someone "re-lists" that player. I'm easy either way but one for discussion before it causes an issue.

I think we let it go this season as we are playing around with the new site and all have admin powers. As of next season if you drop then good bye. This site has allowed me to have 48. It just then tells me I'll need to drop 3.

I'd imagine next season when it's only 2 admins we won't be able to keep adding players

 

[Northern Dogs]

I'm a bit unclear on what this means. Can you pick up players that others have delisted or just those that you, yourself have either not included on your keepers?

 

[deeman87]

I'm a bit unclear on what this means. Can you pick up players that others have delisted or just those that you, yourself have either not included on your keepers?

Nah they are talking about ppl delisting a player then re-adding them, like i delisted Seamus Mitchell then did a bunch of trades and now have 9 list spots open so i readded him to my list a week after delisting him.

 

[Jordie_tackles]

I'm a bit unclear on what this means. Can you pick up players that others have delisted or just those that you, yourself have either not included on your keepers?

I think someone delisted a player of players here on the Bigfooty thread. Then kept them on the site when it opened.

Example being previously Flaps drops a player because his contract was not renewed and was told it’s official even though he was picked up post AFL draft but before our draft.

 

[Jordie_tackles]

Yeah I’m not saying I’m strong on this one (that it can or can’t happen) but someone Else may be.

 

[Zim^zuM]

I think someone delisted a player of players here on the Bigfooty thread. Then kept them on the site when it opened.

Example being previously Flaps drops a player because his contract was not renewed and was told it’s official even though he was picked up post AFL draft but before our draft.

From what I've experienced the site has allowed me to hold more players than 45.

That means you can hold everyone, make your trades and delist them later to open up the draft picks u want to take.

So it's not difficult. Once you delist a player he's in the draft pool. If you're not sure don't delist yet.

Even now I have 45 but need a spot to activate 10. I know exactly who I'm delisting. I haven't yet just incase I do another trade and gain my spot that way