Nick Austin, Brad Lloyd, assiatant coaches and entire boardWhile true, it's a bigger issue, you've got to start somewhere. If not Voss or the assistants, where are you starting Soapy?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Nick Austin, Brad Lloyd, assiatant coaches and entire boardWhile true, it's a bigger issue, you've got to start somewhere. If not Voss or the assistants, where are you starting Soapy?
IMO if we get in a "big fish" we need less roles rather than more. Eg if you get a really experienced senior assistant you don't need a head of coaching or a mentor (got to consider the soft cap too)Just my wish list…
If we got any of them, it’ll be an upgrade to what we have now.
We were 2nd. Then fell HARD. Then we were reliant on Port to beat Freo to make 8th. So yes, we fell in. Not too interested where we were all year- the season is long and tough. We weren't consistent enough to remain top 4 and that's not good enough. And we have seen this shit time and time again with this team.Fell into 8th? When we weren’t out of the 8 all season?
Nick Austin, Brad Lloyd, assiatant coaches and entire board
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
In fairness this thread was locked so we could revel in afterglow of a win against the Eagles. Just took a while to open it up again.No surprise coaches threads are top
of the pops after a loss. So reactive, this industry is.![]()
Agreed.You do have to start somewhere. Starts with new CEO that is Football focussed and then starts with Football Boss then decisions on Coaches etc need to be made
Juts sacking coach or some assistants would be worst possible move IMO if we don't address entire department
We’ve made a prelim final, made the 8 another time. Our culture amongst the coaches and playing group is much better. I think a lot of this is hyperbole and exaggeration. We are a significantly better team than we were under Teague
Comparisons between the Teague era and the Voss era as a few are making here are just a tad disingenuous.
I reckon let Wright do both job's(CEO and Head of Footy), seems a shame to limit a bloke with his background to endless board meetings and long lunches.Agreed.
The appointment of Wright is a good first step at least as it’s a prioritisation of football experience over commercial experience. We’re no longer lacking on the commercial side as we were in the early 2000s, but we are severely lacking on the football side which is and always will be our core business.
The next move which is obvious and long overdue is to replace Lloyd as Head of Football. I’ve made my views clear on him in other threads but the crux of it is he’s been in the role since August 2018 and the football department has performed poorly during the period despite changing personnel (senior coaches, assistants, recruiters, players, etc.). At some point (which should have been years ago), you’ve got to fall on your sword as head of the department when it consistently underperforms.
The rest of the decisions (list manager, senior coach, assistants, etc.) flow from there but there’s no way these decisions can be made by Lloyd given his track record. We need decisive action to address the root causes of our issues. Wright is hopefully our man alongside a hand-picked new Head of Football.
We are talking effort and standards. Talent means nothing
With respect do you really think efforts and standards have improved very much?
Not sure that results really indicate that and talent is fairly important.
Not by a lot but they have and I don’t see what talent has to do with effort or standards
I want winners not losersWe are talking effort and standards. Talent means nothing
Yeap - look at filths team ...they dont really have the Cripps H and Charlies with Brownlow and Coleman medals but they all do their part in the team - and are very effective.I want winners not losers
BTW Soap, we were told by the Sayers review that the players were deeply dissatisfied with Teague so I think we should quite reasonably have been expecting a significant improvements in efforts and standards when he got the chop.Not by a lot but they have and I don’t see what talent has to do with effort or standards
What happens if we blow the soft cap for a couple of years to get good development into players? What do we need profits for?IMO if we get in a "big fish" we need less roles rather than more. Eg if you get a really experienced senior assistant you don't need a head of coaching or a mentor (got to consider the soft cap too)
I'd like the players to be asked their thoughts on Voss atm by Wright and Co. Teague's caretaker role, everyone on the list was on the Teague train and eventually they knew he was a dud.BTW Soap, we were told by the Sayers review that the players were deeply dissatisfied with Teague so I think we should quite reasonably have been expecting a significant improvements in efforts and standards when he got the chop.
Has it been significant?
I personally don't think so.
No big deal in itself.What happens if we blow the soft cap for a couple of years to get good development into players? What do we need profits for?
As a team our performances are still mediocre …inconsistency is right up there…players crumbling under expectations, poor skills, poor game style, players mentally not turning up
Makes you question the clubs culture…
By far the biggest problem with the club culture right now is the the supporters imo
I differ from this view.
I think the club has let down the supporters for a long time now and its playing out as very frustrating (frustrating if the game means a lot to you personally; not much if the game/club means less to you or light entertainment).
This view is debatable and hard to measure and a lot of who is right depends on your rating of the club personnel. From 2005-2013 i didnt think the club had anything like a squad of players that could achieve anything so i didnt really have a strong negative view on the club; just maybe that Hughes was underperforming.
Fast forward to this build and squad i think Curnow, Mckay, TDK, Cripps, Walsh, Cerra, Saad, Weitering, soon to be JSoS; sometimes Acres form a backbone that is based on a VERY STRONG core.
Based on my rating, i believe the club are screwing up generational talent bigtime and heading for a massive fail. Some supporters are nuffies and angry over week to week losses....other supporters see a horizon that doesnt look too rosy right now based on age profiling and lack of salary cap space. The anger is split across two camps there and getting mixed up.
The view you take is important context for this overall point. How hard you look at something and how critical you are. Dunstall for the Hawks back pre-crawford took the hardest view and set them up with brutal decisions. A softer view for mine gets you nowhere and it is where we are stuck. A softer view across coaching and players and list mgmt. Leaves us mid table and the inevitable aging our key players into their 30s.
There have been quite a few notable posters on this forum who have been half glass full posters over 10 years who now see a potential horizon that might be horrific....nothing about week to week losses. More about list/cap projections and where we stand with players and the ALL important transition plan this club is 'currently' implementing.