Free Kick Nick rubbing some dencorub into those knees and back after diving and over extending into the MCG turf today.
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Pretty sure you can take remedial primary school English as an adult. You should look in to it.Anyone dumb, simpleton Pies fan you must be.

Log in to remove this Banner Ad
We beat a piss poor demons team by one point in round 2 and drew on the QB clash in 2010 so I take this as a good sign.Lmao this piss Dees team couldnt even beat St Kilda last week and Pie needed big suck from the campaignerpires to get it done.
Not looking good for the Collingwood Retirement Farm. Old legs catching up them? Not even halfway through the season, very sad.
What’s hilarious is that Ed Langdon gave away a pointless free to the worst contested marker in the comp when any attempt at a legal spoil would have done the job otherwise.It's hilarious that this is your take, when the video shows he only ever touched him one hand. And there's no forward motion with his hand.
Naicos should’ve got a load more frees - continually being half off the ball, as this clearly shows -
Wrong. 20 Disposals to 4.Little Nicky being tucked into bed after being given a hot bath by Langdon
Wrong. 20 Disposals to 4.
Daicos won that position comfortably today.

That’s the problem when you invest yourself so heavily in hoping a particular team gets beaten. You tend to sacrifice your integrity and any pretence at objectivity. And you become just another troll.Pies sensitivity on display tonight
All clubs have a nice day out
This was Pies
Not commenting on who won this match up specifically (I didn't see the whole game) but not sure this is the way to make a comparison.Not only that, Daicos kicked a goal and finished with 95 SC points, as opposed to Langdon who was the WORST rated player on the ground Ruth 24 SC.
Langdon had ZERO score involvements compared to Daicos four.
Langdon had four disposals in the second quarter. He had ZERO disposals in the first, third and fourth quarter. That's Langdon winning?![]()
Do you feel your dick grow bigger when you say thatLittle Nicky being tucked into bed after being given a hot bath by Langdon
that is what constitutes a win at Melbourne - a bit like expected scoreNot only that, Daicos kicked a goal and finished with 95 SC points, as opposed to Langdon who was the WORST rated player on the ground Ruth 24 SC.
Langdon had ZERO score involvements compared to Daicos four.
Langdon had four disposals in the second quarter. He had ZERO disposals in the first, third and fourth quarter. That's Langdon winning?![]()
would certainly have been some significant shrinkage after their last 2 grand final flopsDo you feel your dick grow bigger when you say that
All the umpire sooking just makes it sweeterthat is what constitutes a win at Melbourne - a bit like expected score
lol. real smart cookie. Daicos' role was to get as much easy, useless footy as possible and Langdon's role was to stop Daicos from doing so. Langdon annihilated him.Not only that, Daicos kicked a goal and finished with 95 SC points, as opposed to Langdon who was the WORST rated player on the ground Ruth 24 SC.
Langdon had ZERO score involvements compared to Daicos four.
Langdon had four disposals in the second quarter. He had ZERO disposals in the first, third and fourth quarter. That's Langdon winning?![]()
you're just salty because you came up against a rebuilding team and you got beaten in every facet of the game, except from the free kick column and the result was on our boot and not yours.that is what constitutes a win at Melbourne - a bit like expected score
LOL, Nick had 19, 8 clearances, 9 contested possessions and 1 goal, with a massive potato hanging off him all day.lol. real smart cookie. Daicos' role was to get as much easy, useless footy as possible and Langdon's role was to stop Daicos from doing so. Langdon annihilated him.
yep, on the expected score ladder, you're undefeatedyou're just salty because you came up against a rebuilding team and you got beaten in every facet of the game, except from the free kick column and the result was on our boot and not yours.
Well you ****ed that up didn't yayou're just salty because you came up against a rebuilding team and you got beaten in every facet of the game, except from the free kick column and the result was on our boot and not yours.
Are you trying to tell me Leigh Matthews knows more about footy than salty Bigfooty flogs that hate Collingwood? Crazy talkOn a sober rewatch I noticed a few things, one the umpiring on Daicos as was noted by Leigh Matthew’s was just terrible.
Like it or not this game is better when stars are allowed to be their best and the way Nick was clearly illegally held for most of the first half and not called is bad for business. I also can’t believe the commentary that the tag worked, Nick got 20 and a goal while ed touched it 4 times. Meanwhile collingwoods most dangerous player in these conditions was always going to be Pendlebury.
Slippery ball, pressure game, close game where even one misskick can turn the game and you let pendles get 29 touches at 90% efficiency is where you lose the game. Ed Langdon would have been better off playing his own game.
The next thing that was so jarring was yes, the terrible insufficient intent decisions. I think the worst part about it however was the commentary begging for more bad decisions to be made after the first one.
Nick daicos hand ball out of bounds wasn’t insufficient intent, but neither was the one against I think sparrow (correct me if I’m wrong ) where he’s tackled on the boundary and hits a random handball. I thought we wanted the game to be in motion? Stop sending the players such mixed messaging. Sparrow should have been better dragging it in which is the opposite of what we’ve allegedly been trying to incentivise.
The carryon around Melbourne is actually getting toxic. This is a club that has been frankly traumatised and they should be given some respect in that nature.
Angus Brayshaw had is career ruined by another traumatic brain injury, he was the glue guy for that team and the next year one of their best ever players almost dies on the footy field, all the while players like Clayton Oliver are struggling with severe drug addiction and mental health issues and the media alongside the fans are just sitting there waiting for a reason to pile on this club and make their lives miserable.
Then the Gawn-May incident, **** me yes it looked a bit awkward at the time and May has off field issues but fresh off the indigenous round the entire afl media ecosystem was ready to lynch an aboriginal man for his “emotional immaturity” (I sledged him in the match thread too so I’m guilty) when it seems like he just asked Gawn how much time he thought he had left and Gawny couldn’t hear him and was pissed off so told him to shove it.
And all of this coming on the day we were supposed to be honouring Neale Daniher for his mammoth contribution to the AFL and broader society and the demons absolutely made him proud with how they played. Shattered for the family that they didn’t get their result but the pies were just an inch too good.
Tough life for demons fans at the moment. It’s an important and historic insulation and I hope they can get their board, CEO and new HQ sorted because that club and its key people deserve better.