Fair comments. I suspect you're right on your first point re: the AFLFA typically focusing on the collective vs. the individual. Still there are times where an individual fan is mistreated (including where he/she has done something wrong), and I don't think it's too much to ask the Fans Association to speak up when that happens. Clearly, this is one of those occasions. I've no problem with a sanction. A five year ban is absolutely ridiculous.I’d imagine there are a few things going on here:
(1) The AFLFA are representing the fans as a collective rather than fans as individuals. So when deciding whether to support the rights of a fan to behave like twit, versus the rights of fans to enjoy the footy without the behaviour of twits, they’ll always favour the latter
(2) The price we pay for admission doesn’t cover the costs to put on the show. Even as a collective. Not by a long way. The broadcasting dollars are huge. The taxpayers contribution is huge (people who don’t go that the footy are also taxpayers)
(3) I’d put this incident in the same category as streakers. The AFL / MCG / Clubs / AFLFA would prefer not to sanction anybody anything, but they need to stop undesirable behaviour somehow, and using harsh punitive actions, and making a highly publicised example of somebody is unfortunately effective. There will be a report circulated internally every week about the number of messages sent to the anti-social hotline, including nuisance messages - there’ll be a bunch of people looking at that closely next week and expecting it to go down.
(4) Every advocacy group needs to pick their battles. AFLFA have clearly judged this isn’t one worth fighting.
Also, it's not just about this bloke who's copped a ban. The AFL and the clubs apparently view supporters/members as dispendible: they'll happily throw a supporter under a bus if it helps to manage this week's media cycle. Similarly, media outlets have no qualms with completely dishonest reporting on fan behaviour. That's bad news for all of us who attend matches. This BS would be less likely if there were an organisation pushing back on it.
And yes, you're right that advocacy groups need to pick their battles. My issue is that they've actually weighed in on this one, and seemed to have basically plagiarised the sanctimonious press statements made by the AFL and Collingwood.










