Remove this Banner Ad

NWO/Illuminati US politics - Pt 5

  • Thread starter Thread starter Werewolf
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Here is PART 4

Donald Trump was sworn in as president of the United States on Monday 20th January, 2025 in Washington DC.

The Assassination of Charlie Kirk

Take Note

Anti-trans commentary and nastiness will be deleted and warnings issued.
 
No real thoughts, just thought it was piss funny. Assault with a deli weapon on a member of the national guard is no joke, glad Trump is putting his foot down and charging him with terrorism while putting Maxwell in a country club and pardoning insurrectionists. He's a man on integrity.
Assault with a breadly weapon
Lettuce pray for the victim of this crime
 
bourbons I have to admit it... I was wrong...

He was not consistent. And he doesn't believe that the post count matters without context.


Is there any 'right-wing' poster on this entire site who isn't dishonest??!?
I actually love it, always know how badly they've crashed out and found themselves devoid of even semi-coherent arguments when they start banging on about post counts.

That or [banned acronym] :thumbsu:
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Don't tell me you're another one of these idiots who believes Crooks was a Republican voter?



As for DeCarlos Brown Jr, think about it. Progressive judges freed this guy 14 times and he refused psychiatric help multiple times. In some areas he would have been forced to receive that help involuntarily but not in the Democrat run area he lived in where progressives are opposed to involuntary treatment, casting it as a violation of consent. You really think he was a Republican?




full


Speaking from experience, don't get drawn in to the tangent, stay on target.

Target in this case being right wing violence dwarfs left wing violence in the US and the cultists are completely incapable of refuting that because its objective reality.
 
Or just leave politics out of it.

I would think it's very easy to make an entertaining show without injecting politics into it.

Injecting real world politics or ideologies into shows these days seems a certain way to either tank the show or restrict its appeal to a wider audience.

Aiming at just Trump supporters would be a terrible move financially by a company.

Carson and Letterman are considered the GOATs of that genre because anyone of any background could sit down and be entertained by them.
A lot of the criticism regarding Trump shouldn't really be about politics, rather common sense and decency. Comedy has often gone after the powerful, and sometimes certain powerful figures just provide more material.

Regarding Letterman, even in Trump's first term, he wanted to revisit things.


He's no fan of the Kimmel punishment.
 
A search for the word supremacist by username bourbons, generates a list 3 pages long, the latest instance (apart from the post I'm responding to) was less than a week ago when you quoted a paragraph from a Guardian article where the first two words of the quote you selected was "white supremacist". 🤣 I stand by my original claim that you regularly dribble on about white supremacists.
Ahh I see, sources or even posts I quote from cult members mentioning the term quote count now. Going well mate :tearsofjoy:

And wow, a whole 3 pages, including quotes, over almost 20 years here. Seems low if anything lol

Maybe check this stuff first as opposed to seeing some trigger words and just mashing the keyboard ;)
 
The compassionate left speaks again. A soulless jokey reaction to a guy having his head hacked off in front of his wife and child. As expected.
You'd have to provide evidence of this, but you can't.

I saw that story days ago, I'm not just now reacting to it here. I'm laughing at you and Scott Jennings.
 
A lot of the criticism regarding Trump shouldn't really be about politics, rather common sense and decency. Comedy has often gone after the powerful, and sometimes certain powerful figures just provide more material

Regarding Letterman, even in Trump's first term, he wanted to revisit things.


He's no fan of the Kimmel punishment.

Well it is about politics.

The majority of people are sick to death of people talking about it.

They are sick of hearing about it.

Do you talk about Trump outside of BF?
I know I don't.

The fatigue of politics is real for people.

They want escapism in their entertainment, not to have to listen to the bullshit they are trying to avoid.

Letterman never brought politics into his show.

That's why he rated so highly.
 
All this hand wringing over free speech.
I wouldn't call a government threatening and suing media orgs for speech they don't like 'hand wringing' exactly, seems to go a bit further than that.

But seriously, imagine if the Biden admin had done anything approaching this to Fox personalities or something. You would have spontaneously combusted long ago lol

Flip flop 🙃🤡
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Or just leave politics out of it.

I would think it's very easy to make an entertaining show without injecting politics into it.

Injecting real world politics or ideologies into shows these days seems a certain way to either tank the show or restrict its appeal to a wider audience.

Aiming at just Trump supporters would be a terrible move financially by a company.

Carson and Letterman are considered the GOATs of that genre because anyone of any background could sit down and be entertained by them.
rofl

Yes, traditionally late night talk shows have made nary a mention of and avoided bits based on politics, well said :tearsofjoy:

And even if they have, dear leader is well within his rights to issue an edict declaring these companies make the required change and no longer base any of their content or speech on politics, all good play on.

Just listen to yourself, mate :drunk::drunk::drunk:
 
I've mastered getting you to bite at my posts.

Checkmate.
I'm just glad you've decided to put the big boy pants on and actually respond to a few of mine, very unlike you. Usually you just pretend the ones containing logic problematic to whatever nonsense you're banging on about don't exist.

I thank you for the opportunity to more fully explore your current level of derangement, works a lot better over an extended interaction :thumbsu::tearsofjoy:
 
**** me that guy bites on almost every post.

No wonder they have thousands more posts than anyone else.
How can I not mate, you guys keep posting the most hilarious batshit insanity imaginable, apparently with a straight face.

Best thread on the site and some of the best internet you will ever read :thumbsu:
 
Well it is about politics.

The majority of people are sick to death of people talking about it.

They are sick of hearing about it.

Do you talk about Trump outside of BF?
I know I don't.

The fatigue of politics is real for people.

They want escapism in their entertainment, not to have to listen to the bullshit they are trying to avoid.

Letterman never brought politics into his show.

That's why he rated so highly.
I think you'll find that the amount of content regarding Trump is because he's so openly and outwardly reprehensible, there's more material there.

Yeah I talk about politics and Trump with friends, family outside of BigFooty, even strangers I've met at bars, on holiday etc (including in the US). Politics, democracy and human rights is of interest to some people who don't view politics as just a transactional vehicle to get what they can for themselves and be done with it.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

I think you'll find that the amount of content regarding Trump is because he's so openly and outwardly reprehensible, there's more material there.

Yeah I talk about politics and Trump with friends, family outside of BigFooty. Politics, democracy and human rights is of interest to some people who don't view politics as just a transactional vehicle to get what they can for themselves and be done with it.

Jinping is far more reprehensible.

Do we see the same people or the same level of people losing their shit over that tyrant?

In these conversations you have how often are you discussing China over the US?
 
Hey Dogs_R_Us, do you reckon this one will get a mention in 4 Corners' inevitable upcoming and oh so unfair hit piece on Trump enriching himself and his cronies?


UAE sheikh Tahnoon bin Zayed Al Nahyan, who controls the UAE sovereign wealth fund, deposits 2 billion (thats billion, with a B) into Trump's shitcoin. And would you look at that, 2 weeks later in an obviously unrelated decision the Trump admin strikes a deal to give the UAE technology firm G42 access to hundreds of thousands of the world’s most advanced and scarce computer chips, despite national security concerns that the chips could be shared with China.

Oh whats that? The same Sheikh Tahnoon also controls the G42 technology firm that will be receiving the chips?

Nothing to see here 🤡
 
Imagine claiming others are deranged when you have thousands more posts in a thread than anyone else.

The purest form of irony there.
Mate, I could have millions more posts here than you and the cultists and I'm quite sure you blokes would still have me well covered in the derangement stakes :tearsofjoy:
 
Last edited:
Well when you talk to people like that you just solidify their views, not change them.

Left wing rants don't change people's minds.

They just end up pushing other people to the side you are not.

It's that simple.

Your post comes straight out of an echo chamber too.
I'm quoting this here so the Crime board's Kirk thread doesn't continue to be hijacked.

So, both "sides" talk at each other in the way you're talking about. What's your solution then? Because if you have one, I haven't seen it utilized.

The thing everyone should be able to agree on is not to hate and oppress, when it comes to queer and trans people or people they simply disagree with, unless they are Nazis obviously. It's that simple, I would have thought.
 
Imagine claiming others are deranged when you have thousands more posts in a thread than anyone else.

The purest form of irony there.
Imagine being unable to argue points well or stick to them, so that your recourse is to blather about post numbers.

Imagine supposedly not caring that much about a topic, yet frequenting forums/threads about it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom