- Jul 6, 2017
- 36,291
- 54,878
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
-
Mobile App Discontinued
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Delisted Callum Ah Chee - Joins Adelaide via the PSD
- Thread starter go_the_dockers
- Start date
- Tagged users None
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
Like every club does, you didn’t get what YOU wanted he’s gone, move on and stop whinging like a two year old
We traded you the equivalent of pick 5 for Dunkley if you look at the points value. You’re just being bitter because you lost one of your best players.
Maybe think about why he left rather than trying to make us out to be the bad guys when we paid a fair price. We don’t have a history of lowballing players…if you can think of a few examples it might help your cause rather than just saying it over and over again.
- Aug 6, 2021
- 8,737
- 16,307
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
Trade value is not always objective. It is often to do with what is the “fairest” offer a club can put together with what it has available. At the time you’re referring to trading future picks was not an option.
We also were forced to accept essentially pick 10 and steak knives for a prime Patrick Dangerfield. In no world was that fair value.
But, it was the best offer Geelong could realistically put together, so we had to take it.
The trade you’re referring to involved a FA compo pick that Melbourne received for Sylvia. In that same year, the Dees had access to picks 2 and 20, they’re next pick was pick 40.
So the Crows would have been asking for one of the Dees picks in the 20s, and the alternative would have been to accept a pick in the 40s.
That’s a very different scenario to this one.
lol, you brisbane supporters really don't know anything.
the northern academies are funded by BOTH the club, and the AFL. its a joint venture.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
you get access to the Fitzroy father sons, under the 100 game criteria. but sure
Maboo
Premium Gold
No it is not,it is funded by the club lol
Maboo
Premium Gold
Haha all the Sons of Fitzroy players are retired, get a grip
We need Kevin Murray to knock up someone and produce a gun kid just to rub it in.
Maboo
Premium Gold
Does he not have a son, would still be only about 60 if he does, but hey we still have access.
Where did you pull that falsehood from? Are you referring to Browny getting picked up for his father playing over 50 games. That was over 25 years ago and was stopped shortly after. You are a paranoid lot.
Nobody cared about the Lions when we were getting pillaged. We are where we are cos we get our house in order after being a shit club. Sorry about that.
are u talking about the club that finished 30 years ago lol
the youngest 100 game player is Stephen Paxman who is 55 who also played 100+ for port with adult children lol
Bolton and Rioli were both contracted. Bolton was a fair trade and GCS throws picks like confetti (they don't value picks just like you guys because of their massive leg up), West Coast gave overs for an uncontracted Baker but they did some strange trade that year even their CEO had to do a press conference to "explain" it.
yeah no, you havent had just one, sam marshall, Blake Coleman? these are all recent too... and all in the first round
this was in direct response to the guy who said they only got father sons after 1991, which isnt true
this takes 5 seconds to look this up, like really, you guys dont know anything lol
You missed the point I was making, the poster said that they were happy to let there premiership heroes go….. because they compensated well in all the trades
Senor M
Hookturnistan Forever!!!
- Oct 16, 2016
- 21,557
- 32,480
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Other Teams
- Las Vegas Bears
I didn't see Adelaide threatening to walk Ah Chee to the PSD; they made multiple offers to him over the week before deadline day
Also--- is it even a guarantee that Ah Chee makes it to the Crows?
One was a fair trade and the others they got lucky. Like the poster said, they would have had to accept any picks for Rioli and Baker especially for Baker as he was uncontracted.
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
Port Power can select him if they can convince him after talking to him. Likely will need to offer slightly over our offer though.I didn't see Adelaide threatening to walk Ah Chee to the PSD; they made multiple offers to him over the week before deadline day
Also--- is it even a guarantee that Ah Chee makes it to the Crows?
IF Damo was our list manager THEN we would be as relevant as his club norf
They must be living in a bubble up there as their media don't talk about the AFL, it's all about the Premier Bronco with them treated as less importance than the SANFL Premier here. The media has been smashing them for not doing the trade and these nuffies Brisbane posters are either deluded or coping. Like I said, had we offer a F3 then the media will be smashing us for not offering a fair trade.
Lol at anyone who agrees or listens to that tool.
If people agree with Damo THEN they need to check themselves into a psych ward.
Not just him. Twomey was "shock" you guys did do the trade and then there's Edmund, Ralph and Cornes who are usually massive flogs toward us so that's saying something.
Think you will find most of us would have preferred if a deal was reached but can understand why it’s gone the way it has.
Ironic that you would post this though given you’re still crying about the Dunkley trade from 3 years ago which was actually somewhat fair all things considered. Imagine your reaction if you were forced to either take unders for him like we were asked to do or lose him for nothing. You’d probably say send him to the PSD I reckon
