Remove this Banner Ad

List Mgmt. Draft thread - 2025 (remaining picks: 29, 34)

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Live draft hand
R1: 1 (Duursma), 4 (CDT), 19 (Lindsay)
R2: 29, 34
RD: 1

Draft picks pre-draft
R1: 1, 2, 13
R2: 34, 41
RD: 1

List spots available
Main list: 2 (includes Duursma, CDT, Lindsay)
Cat A Rookie list: 1 (expecting Robertson, Macrae and Schoenberg to join as SSP signings)
Cat B Rookie list: 1

Draft order

Draft prospect video highlights (thanks to noobermensch)

Rookie Me Central 2025 Draft Guide


Matthew Clarke on Gettable 17/11


Cal Twomey’s Phantom Draft

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Should we start a closest to the pin on total number of posts at midnight tonight? Currently at ~6,700.

Fair chance we are pushing towards 8,000 by then.
Will be another 8,000 melt posts after tonight's selection, unhappy campers will complain all season.
 
Cal reporting Essendon might offer 5/6 and 9 for 2. What’s everyone’s thoughts?

Might grant us a Farrow, Cummings or Sharp and Schubert at 13 in addition to Duursma
We get very very tight on list spots if make trade pick 2 by itself for 2 picks. Would be left unable to match bids if bids came later for more than one of our NGA/Father Sons. The fact this board could see it coming a mile away and yet the club didn't resolve it when there was an easy solution with Cripps going to the rookie list is negligence.

Not saying we wouldn't do it because top end talent >>>>>> mid draft talent, but you'd have to be prepared for a Banfield running around for some team you hate.
 
Cal reporting Essendon might offer 5/6 and 9 for 2. What’s everyone’s thoughts?

Might grant us a Farrow, Cummings or Sharp and Schubert at 13 in addition to Duursma

crap idea. crap trade. means NGA's can be matched.

cal is an Essendon fan, so he is pushing their narrative. you can't make that trade on hope those players are there. what if they aren't?

people seem to have convinced themselves that in reality, clubs think sharp is no.2 but are forced to pick this weaker player in CDT. so they have to trade down, just to get this superior player and not miss out.

Maybe if Essendon offer 5 and future 1st. Any movement for 2 needs to include future 1st I reckon.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Cal reporting Essendon might offer 5/6 and 9 for 2. What’s everyone’s thoughts?

Might grant us a Farrow, Cummings or Sharp and Schubert at 13 in addition to Duursma
I think a lot depends at this point on who Richmond will take.

If Essendon want CDT, I'm not sure we're doing that now.

If Essendon want Robey and Richmond are prepared to take CDT, I don't think we do that either.

If Essendon want Robey and Richmond are set on their plans and we can get CDT at 5, I think we'd take it, though I would want Sharp with that second pick.
 
crap idea. crap trade. means NGA's can be matched.

cal is an Essendon fan, so he is pushing their narrative. you can't make that trade on hope those players are there. what if they aren't?

people seem to have convinced themselves that in reality, clubs think sharp is no.2 but are forced to pick this weaker player in CDT. so they have to trade down, just to get this superior player and not miss out.

Maybe if Essendon offer 5 and future 1st. Any movement for 2 needs to include future 1st I reckon.
Top 10 pick or NGA who might not get drafted. Pretty obvious choice there.

Question is a lot more to do with CDT vs two top 10 picks.
 
These comments by Duursma appear to confirm that he has been playing predominantly in defence, not as a mid, and that initially he was frustrated by that but then accepted it.
This year.

He got taken out of the midfield because clubs wanted to see his versatility.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

I couldn't give a rats about our club tied players excluding banfield. If barkers still on on the board Id happily trade up for him after the addinsal pick.

Duursma
CDT
Addinsal
Barker
Banfield (R)

Would be a very good haul. Would've like a bit more grunt/tenacity around the contest in Sharp or Cumming but we should do very well still.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Goddard was a top ~10/15 player in the comp for 5+ years at his peak. The idea that you'd be upset if a pick 1 was "only" as good as Goodard is silly. Was an awesome player.

His performance in the drawn GF in 2010 was epic.
He was a bit floggish though. That probably clouds people's opinions of him.
 
Im getting rather emotional now. That was meant to be Harley giving to sharp.

Now harley is giving the jumper to some family who made him fat and a 200cm ruck who there is nothing in common with. This is photo has the potential of going the worst with 3 leaving the club

I'm not watching and It's rather gloomy day. Even more gloomy then last preseason where we ended up with 1 win.

The club I know and love has jumped the shark today.



Rolling out the morose disposition early, I didn't expect it but it's a lovely tact.
Let the steam build over the course of the day, look resentfully at some puppies etc. The viscera start to churn.
You are going to me primed for the coverage. About 4PM the invective juices start to flow - every Twomey pun a ticking of the doomsday clock. Blood vessels in the eyes, veins in the temple, a furious sweat. Lashing out online and into the cosmos. A hatred for the Gods. A few short hours later as they think about anouncing pick 1, silence. The calm before the storm. A thousand mile stare, maybe the occasional soft whimper. Duursma, whatever, nothing moves you. A deep internal bracing against the weight of eons. Time collapses, only a heartbeat, that golden conviction, thrumming for just one man. The dagger of fate, the blade at the jugular - it has to be Sharp.




















Then the pick.





We're in unchartered territory, the world teeters on its axis.
Just one syllable will do it, but the universe holds its breath.
We lean imperceptibly in
and we wait.
 
crap idea. crap trade. means NGA's can be matched.

cal is an Essendon fan, so he is pushing their narrative. you can't make that trade on hope those players are there. what if they aren't?

people seem to have convinced themselves that in reality, clubs think sharp is no.2 but are forced to pick this weaker player in CDT. so they have to trade down, just to get this superior player and not miss out.

Maybe if Essendon offer 5 and future 1st. Any movement for 2 needs to include future 1st I reckon.
Maybe the club rates the top 10 prospect way higher than any of the club tied prospects. Maybe it’s all just pie in the sky, we will find out soon enough.
 
This whole time I have been referring to him as Duff-Tyler. Now you're telling me there is an extra T in there. I am not sure I can get around that extra T.
Don't worry. There are plenty of people around here that haven't gotten around to realising that there isn't an "i" in Hewett either.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top