- Joined
- Oct 20, 2017
- Posts
- 10,514
- Reaction score
- 22,293
- AFL Club
- Western Bulldogs
Originally it was meant to stand for a further 3 months. I agree 100% a person facing trial for such accusations deserves anonymity and in this case it was lifted as it should be. I also agree you can't judge his brothers, parents or family as a whole for the terrible things he has done nor for trying to give him the best lawyers possible, he has put them in a very tricky position.Why? He's entitled to presumption of innocence until proven guilty by a group of his peers. Which he was last Friday.
That it took a further 6 days to lift the order after conviction is not a reflection of his families influence or wealth. It's a consequence of court scheduling. Which due to its often archaic practices was always going to be outrun by social media. This is borne out by the fact that Tom Silvangnis name has been openly circulating as the defendant in this case for months.
It's just in the last few days that it finally broke into the wider public realm. And teh pile onto a family that did nothing more than defend their son began. Now they have to deal with the fact that unless the verdict is overturned on appeal that their son is a rapist.
My comments were more leveled at the system then those in this case, the avenue to get an extension on a gag order for crimes like this, once found guilty shouldn't exist. The fact it took media pressure and the victim going to social media for that gag order to be given up on is pretty sad.
I wouldn't wish any of these outcomes on any family rich, poor or otherwise. It is just a sad reality that families are often left negatively perceived by the broader community when one member is the issue.






