- Mar 28, 2023
- 26,957
- 52,391
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
Likely a lesser sentence.So if he owned it, was remorseful the whole time and admitted it, what would have happened?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Likely a lesser sentence.So if he owned it, was remorseful the whole time and admitted it, what would have happened?
Yep think it’s about right slight unders but I did expect them to err on the side of lesser here. It removes the ability to appeal on a sentence being manifestly excessive
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
I hate this outlook, yes I know it can spare the victim of future appeals, but it's not justice.
There is no evidence that many women make vexatious reports of sexual offences. The rate of false allegations of sexual offences is very low. A range of studies show approximately 5% of rape allegations are proven false.The problem is there have been innocent blokes falsely accused in the past so people are naturally skeptical in most cases now. It often comes down to he says/she says and luckily this time the text messages and attempt to hide evidence were damning
6 years is a pretty reasonable sentence. Definitely not light. I get the sentiment these days is to lock people away who do this stuff and throw away the key. But you can't really have a justice system that functions like that.I hate this outlook, yes I know it can spare the victim of future appeals, but it's not justice.
6 years is a pretty reasonable sentence. I get the sentiment these days is to lock people away who do this stuff and throw away the key. But you can't really have a justice system that functions like that.
6 years is a pretty reasonable sentence. Definitely not light. I get the sentiment these days is to lock people away who do this stuff and throw away the key. But you can't really have a justice system that functions like that.
no doubt a lot of thought, evidence and analysis has gone into arriving at this sentence
my own ill-informed gut feel is its unders .... and likely doesnt account for a multi-year campaign to intimidate/silence/buy-off the victim ..... surly there has to be consequences for the way the silvagni family has behaved here
6 years is a pretty reasonable sentence. Definitely not light. I get the sentiment these days is to lock people away who do this stuff and throw away the key. But you can't really have a justice system that functions like that.
It happens so rarely it isn’t worth mentioning tbh.Im not victim blaming here im just saying it does happen
lets hope she is given the space and respect to do so ..... and finds comfort and peace in the processI have a feeling the victim will be airing more on that. She doesn't seem intimidated at all which is great.
Could be a civil complaint about that if it has happened as expected.no doubt a lot of thought, evidence and analysis has gone into arriving at this sentence
my own ill-informed gut feel is its unders .... and likely doesnt account for a multi-year campaign to intimidate/silence/buy-off the victim ..... surly there has to be consequences for the way the silvagni family has behaved here
Look ill just ****n deiete it so everyone calms down. I think hes a piece of shit that deserves every bit of jail time coming and was just half referencing the Tanner Bruhn case as a comparison which was clearly a horrific mistakeIt happens so rarely it isn’t worth mentioning tbh.
Woukd also be astronomically rare for those false allegations to ever get to court.
Worth looking up the stats on complaints, investigations, charges and convictions on this subject.
I'm not here to defend the Silvagnis, but is there any evidence of this occuring (at least to the level that the courts would take into account)?no doubt a lot of thought, evidence and analysis has gone into arriving at this sentence
my own ill-informed gut feel is its unders .... and likely doesnt account for a multi-year campaign to intimidate/silence/buy-off the victim ..... surly there has to be consequences for the way the silvagni family has behaved here
I'm not here to defend the Silvagnis, but is there any evidence of this occuring (at least to the level that the courts would take into account)?
Also according to the national health statistics and the ABS. 22% of women have experienced sexual violence since the age of 15.There is no evidence that many women make vexatious reports of sexual offences. The rate of false allegations of sexual offences is very low. A range of studies show approximately 5% of rape allegations are proven false.
This myth about false allegations is harmful for society and harmful for
victims of sexual offences. It contributes to under-reporting. And victims wrongly fear they will be met with disbelief and blame if they report.
You would think that when it does come to his parole hearing that he will need to finally admit his wrong doing for them to even consider releasing him.
Not sure if he'll be going to Barwon, more likely Ararat apparently.
The guys life is going to be extremely hard after he comes out. He would be lucky to get a job at Woolworths stacking shelves. This is an extremely public case and no employer would take a risk on a high profile sex offender any time soon.6 years is a pretty reasonable sentence. Definitely not light. I get the sentiment these days is to lock people away who do this stuff and throw away the key. But you can't really have a justice system that functions like that.
No..they stayed silent.Did Silvangi's make any comment after the sentencing today?