Unless you are paid to watch kids play football full time and have done so for years then I'm not sure how anyone can think they know enough to compare drafts.
There's nothing stopping them from trading those picks for a premium pick if they want one so bad. Or alternatively it just gives us more leverage if we do consider giving up pick 2.
GWS would want pick two but our two firsts straight up would be in line with what GWS would have expected to get from the Treloar deal (it's unlikely they were expecting pick 8 from the Pies 2016 pick).
If Kelly was contracted then pick 2 would almost certainly be involved, but they lose a lot...
I'd still probably prefer our first this year and next while keeping the Hawks pick.
Gives us one guaranteed gun mid and one of the best mids in the draft this year. While it costs us next years first, we need quality players sooner rather than later. Getting a gun kid next year might be harder...
Cause I've never seen Steele or Dunstan play football and didn't post a video of Steele's highlights demonstrating that he attacks the contest with pace.
Except most things more complex than a card game aren't confined to a simple win/lose outcome.
We've spent 1 high draft pick on a key forward and you are acting like we've wasted every pick we have on them. If you haven't noticed the rebuild isn't over and we are going to pick up mids this...
Cause he was playing as a forward most of his time at GWS. You didn't mention anything about centre clearances but that footage clearly shows Steel is not slow when he attacks the contest.
You said "Yes Jack Steele gets more tackles because he is second to the ball on most occasions while...