Conspiracy Theory 9/11 - Part 2

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
LicoriceAllsorts said:
didyouknowzimm.jpg
Click to expand...
Not true.
************
Some sites like to make this sound as though Zim left in a hurry, perhaps unexpectedly, and it’s claimed they broke their lease. No source is ever provided for this suggestion, though, and other accounts say not. ...their rental lease contract with the Port Authority expired on September 1. Still, Zim Israel had kept a small office behind in the World Trade Center, an office which consisted of their computer shipping tracking equipment. All of the computers were destroyed in the 9/11 attack and Zim's operations were actually down for a short period.
...
And the “sudden” move? Not so sudden. The President of the company said “initial planning for this move began as part of a Go Forward Plan initiated almost two years ago”. It had been announced the previous April that they were going to relocate to Norfolk, Virginia, in April 2001.

ZIM isn't "half-owned by the Rothschilds". That claim comes from Neo-Nazi Christopher Bollyn, who believes that "The Rothschilds" own Israel. At the time, ZIM was half-owned by the Israeli government.

The ZIM claim was initially made in an article at "American Free Press", successor to The Spotlight. You can't get the original article from AFP anymore, as Bollyn was fired and all his articles deleted when he began claiming that AFP was a Jewish/Zionist front group.

https://www.metabunk.org/zim-shipping-company-did-you-know-photo-i-found-from-fb.t3856/

*************
Not surprising either...
 
LicoriceAllsorts said:
Putin says he's going to reveal proof that the U.S. government and intelligence agencies were responsible for the controlled demolition of the World Trade Centre on September 11 this year

Trump also has said that he is going to reveal "who really knocked down the WTC" when he gets elected... which will most likely lead to his assassination


It's gonna get juicy
Click to expand...
I see o_O
This is the same guy who refuses to admit that MH17 wasn't shot down by a Russian Buk :drunk:
Hint: Vladimir Putin relies on stupid people to accept his lies.
 
Present Not Past said:
I see o_O
This is the same guy who refuses to admit that MH17 wasn't shot down by a Russian Buk :drunk:
Hint: Vladimir Putin relies on stupid people to accept his lies.
Click to expand...

Don't believe the bull s**t they spread about Putin in the West. He openly confronted g20 leaders in the latest summit and made a very clear insinuation that he had satellite footage which could expose leaders in that very room about arming ISIS. Some members were stunned, whilst others had no retort. I'll have to find this footage, but it happened.

He basically backed them into a corner... Putin isn't an angel, but if you think he is the worlds problem,you will be shocked with what may unfold.

On MH17, were you aware that a month before that plane crash, China and Russia had signed off on a 400 billion dollar resource deal? I'm not trying it together, but there are geopolitical motives that shouldn't be completely swept under the carpet as possibilities.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

LicoriceAllsorts said:
Putin says he's going to reveal proof that the U.S. government and intelligence agencies were responsible for the controlled demolition of the World Trade Centre on September 11 this year

Trump also has said that he is going to reveal "who really knocked down the WTC" when he gets elected... which will most likely lead to his assassination


It's gonna get juicy
Click to expand...

Good luck with this one Mr Oracle
 
LicoriceAllsorts said:
The biggest factor that points to a planned demolition of three buildings is that there was asymmetrical damage to each of the buildings yet they fell symmetrically.
Click to expand...

That sounds really convincing until i remember you don't have a clue about structural engineering.
 
BustedWing said:
Quality CT'ing done here by LicoriceAllsorts. Once backed into a corner about melted steel, he proceeds to completely ignore that topic of conversation, ignore any and all questions put to him, and then post 7 different (and contradictory) conspiracy theories.

It's textbook stuff, and i'm disappointed in myself that I expected anything different. :(
Click to expand...
Not really, because 'melted steel' isn't my line of work, doesn't mean I don't find it suspicious

Also what about my posts were contradictory?
 
I am going to say this is cringeworthy, who the * cares if you are an actor or artist, lawyer, etc.?

Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth
http://www.ae911truth.org/

Pilots for 9/11 Truth
http://www.pilotsfor911truth.org/

Military Officers for 9/11 Truth
http://www.militaryofficersfor911truth.org/

Scientists for 9/11 Truth
http://www.scientistsfor911truth.org/

Firefighters for 9/11 Truth
http://firefightersfor911truth.org/

Actors & Artists for 9/11 Truth
http://www.actorsandartistsfor911truth.org/
Medical Professionals for 9/11 Truth
http://mp911truth.org/

Lawyers for 9/11 Truth
http://lawyersfor911truth.blogspot.com/

Actors, Artists, and Athletes for 9/11 Truth
http://www.aaa911truth.com/
 
LicoriceAllsorts said:
I am going to say this is cringeworthy, who the **** cares if you are an actor or artist, lawyer, etc.?

Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth
http://www.ae911truth.org/

Pilots for 9/11 Truth
http://www.pilotsfor911truth.org/

Military Officers for 9/11 Truth
http://www.militaryofficersfor911truth.org/

Scientists for 9/11 Truth
http://www.scientistsfor911truth.org/

Firefighters for 9/11 Truth
http://firefightersfor911truth.org/

Actors & Artists for 9/11 Truth
http://www.actorsandartistsfor911truth.org/
Medical Professionals for 9/11 Truth
http://mp911truth.org/

Lawyers for 9/11 Truth
http://lawyersfor911truth.blogspot.com/

Actors, Artists, and Athletes for 9/11 Truth
http://www.aaa911truth.com/
Click to expand...
They dont count
They arent with popular mechanics:D:p:D:p
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

...how does a very Jewish news media fit into this.

For instance, I say this a lot: on 9/11, every cable news network and the news divisions of the big three broadcast networks--or the network itself--featured a Jewish President.

  • President ABC News David Westin
  • President NBC Jeff Zucker
  • President CBS Les Moonves
  • President News Corp (FOX) Peter Chernin
  • President CNN Jonathan Klein
  • President MSNBC Rick Kaplan
And of course it goes a lot deeper than this, what with, for instance, FOX News being owned by Rupert Murdoch, an admitted rabid zionist, CBS being owned by VIACOM which is owned by Murray Rothstein (aka Sumner Redstone), ABC being owned by Disney and so Robert Iger and Michael Eisner and so on.

Or how NPR has had now like six Jewish Presidents in a row (it's a public corporation? really?) Or The New York Times, featuring predominantly Jewish columnists and predominantly Jewish editors and the Jewish publisher, the Jewish executive editor, the Jewish editorial page editor, and so forth.

People laying the blame on it being a "corporate" media entirely avoid The New York Times, which is in my mind the most guilty of the media organs of engaging in the initial coverup and then the subsequent warmongering in Iraq. The New York Times is a family controlled paper. There is publicly traded stock of course but the family owns controlling interest and it is structured in a way so that this will never change.

The makeup of the news media is relevant because we know how badly the media betrayed the American public on that day and the days after, and the question is, would the conspirators have proceeded if they didn't know the news media would have their backs?

Would they have been able to turn this attack into endless war if we had a news media that was actually on the job on 9/11?

The best analogy I can come up with is the bank robbery. You've got the guys who go into the bank and they've got the guns and they're the ones pulling out the money and stuffing it into the bags. And then you've got the getaway driver.

The getaway driver didn't rob the bank. But without him, the bank robbers wouldn't have a chance. He's complicit.

And so is the news media.
Click to expand...
 
Below is the tilting of the south tower just before its collapse

According to Sir Isaac Newton’s law of the conservation of momentum, it should have kept tipping over, but it didn't, it fell through the path of greatest resistance. The top was tilting at approximately 20 degrees or so, how could it be exerting a uniform, symmetrical pressure on the floors below? it didn't and couldn't.

YmynBCH.jpg


What you are observing is approximately 30 upper floors beginning to rotate as a block, to the south-east. They begin to topple over, rather than falling straight down. The torque due to gravity on this block is enormous, as is its angular momentum. But then all of a sudden this 30-floor block is turned mostly to powder in mid-air! How can we understand this strange behavior, without the use of explosives?

This video perfectly demonstrates this block turning to powder

 
LicoriceAllsorts said:
Below is the tilting of the south tower just before its collapse

According to Sir Isaac Newton’s law of the conservation of momentum, it should have kept tipping over, but it didn't, it fell through the path of greatest resistance. The top was tilting at approximately 20 degrees or so, how could it be exerting a uniform, symmetrical pressure on the floors below? it didn't and couldn't.

YmynBCH.jpg


What you are observing is approximately 30 upper floors beginning to rotate as a block, to the south-east. They begin to topple over, rather than falling straight down. The torque due to gravity on this block is enormous, as is its angular momentum. But then all of a sudden this 30-floor block is turned mostly to powder in mid-air! How can we understand this strange behavior, without the use of explosives?

This video perfectly demonstrates this block turning to powder

Click to expand...


Wow this is like listening to an episode of Star Trek where scotty is using pseudo science to explain warp technology. Angular momentum? Really?
 
LicoriceAllsorts said:
Are you disputing that angular momentum is a thing? Can you actually dispute anything in that post?
Click to expand...

Oh its a thing all right.
So if you are twirling a steel ball on a piece of cotton tied to your finger, it keeps twirling.
This assumes that the cotton doesn't break or the finger for that matter.
What happens to your angular momentum once that cotton breaks?

So the building starts to lean, more weight goes onto the support of that side of the building (probably already weakened, why else would it lean ) until the supports collapse.
Trying to oversimplify it using Newtons first law ( not going to type out his full name to try to sound more credible ) is vastly oversimplifying.
I've actually had a look at some of the reports about the collapse of those building. The collapse was not simple.
It may be possible to discred the reports by other ( equally complex ) reports. They will not be discredited with video and secondary school physics.

You seem to be claiming that the building was leaning over, ( so obviously going to fall down ) and then someone blew out the lower floors to make it fall more symmetrically. WHAT KIND OF A STUPID PLAN IS THAT?

" Duh , hey George if we just crash a plane into the building it may fall wrong, we'll need to load it with top secret nanothermite to make it fall the way we want it to "?
 
SaintsSeptember said:
Oh its a thing all right.
So if you are twirling a steel ball on a piece of cotton tied to your finger, it keeps twirling.
This assumes that the cotton doesn't break or the finger for that matter.
What happens to your angular momentum once that cotton breaks?

So the building starts to lean, more weight goes onto the support of that side of the building (probably already weakened, why else would it lean ) until the supports collapse.
Trying to oversimplify it using Newtons first law ( not going to type out his full name to try to sound more credible ) is vastly oversimplifying.
I've actually had a look at some of the reports about the collapse of those building. The collapse was not simple.
It may be possible to discred the reports by other ( equally complex ) reports. They will not be discredited with video and secondary school physics.

You seem to be claiming that the building was leaning over, ( so obviously going to fall down ) and then someone blew out the lower floors to make it fall more symmetrically. WHAT KIND OF A STUPID PLAN IS THAT?

" Duh , hey George if we just crash a plane into the building it may fall wrong, we'll need to load it with top secret nanothermite to make it fall the way we want it to "?
Click to expand...
This is a stupid example. The ball is tied to your finger, it obviously eventually loses momentum and returns to your finger.

You didn't get the point. The top 30~ levels of the building fell through the path of least resistance. Are you telling me that there was less resistance in the 500,000 tons of steel and concrete than there was in the thin air next to the building? The only way this is possible is to remove the structure of the building so that there is 0 resistance. Even if you were right and the structure was weakened by the fires, it still would have provided more resistance than thin air.

Trying to mock me doesn't help your argument either
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top