Was always going to be upheld. They have lawyer present evidence for an hour and then choose to take none of it into account.Patrick Voss' ban has been upheld. He'll miss the next three matches.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Was always going to be upheld. They have lawyer present evidence for an hour and then choose to take none of it into account.Patrick Voss' ban has been upheld. He'll miss the next three matches.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Too soon. Let us be bitter and wallow in self pity a while longer before getting rational.No point getting upset or angry over this, it was always going to happen, it is what it is. Out of our control now, club will move on and best Melbourne this week.
Guess "insults" from the noughties are backReally?
Didn’t we win one challenging on behalf of Clam Hands?I don't think we've ever won an appeal at the tribunal. Either our lawyers are shit, or there's a possibility the AFL doesn't like Freo.
This. I am - pointlessly- enraged over yet another failed challenge. The AFL has all the power in this and Freo none. Extra galling that Brierty just like every administrator before him feels he has to be restrained and polite about a load of absolute bollocks from the Tribunal. When will it EVER be Freo’s turn??!!I don't recall that their expertise won Us anything in last 7-8 years...
It’d be a pretty poor show if he was made to bleed someone’s else’s, surely? Not to mention a skill level our Vossy just might not have….Vlastuin was also over heard by the boundary umpire to state ‘He made me bleed my own blood’
The AFL added a week for that comment as some children were near the boundary and may have been influence to throw haymakers.
ZacklyToo soon. Let us be bitter and wallow in self pity a while longer before getting rational.