Remove this Banner Ad

NWO/Illuminati US politics - Pt 5

  • Thread starter Thread starter Werewolf
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Here is PART 4

Donald Trump was sworn in as president of the United States on Monday 20th January, 2025 in Washington DC.

The Assassination of Charlie Kirk

Take Note

Anti-trans commentary and nastiness will be deleted and warnings issued.
 
Bostonian said:
No, you raised reprehensible politicians as something you think is worth talking about with people.

So to ascertain how much you actually give two shits about that kind of leader I asked a question.

So in summary you don't talk shit constantly about the Leader of the biggest threat to our region with other people.
Click to expand...
Thank you for your 'expert opinion'. Hahaha :$ #postcountlivesmatter
 
bourbons said:
As always, I'm sure you can point to examples of me supporting cancel culture previously mate. I'll wait.
Click to expand...
There was a bit going around during BLM. People getting fired for saying 'all lives matter', or even getting murdered for saying that. I'm sure you can point me to your good self decrying cancel culture at that point.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Jamolad said:
Now show us the names of the 51 Republicans that voted against releasing the Epstein files.
Click to expand...

The deciding vote was Susan Collins. What they were voting on was a Schumer amendment and she gave her reasons for voting his amendment down.

[Schumer] maneuvered earlier Wednesday to force a procedural vote on language that would force the Department of Justice to release the Epstein files, inserting it into an annual defense policy bill that Congress has to pass. Senate Republican leadership was then forced to hold a vote to dispense with Schumer’s amendment, arguing that he was inserting political gamesmanship into defense legislation that often enjoys bipartisan support.

“It does not belong on the Department of Defense policy bill,” said Sen. Susan Collins, a Maine Republican.

Senate Majority Leader John Thune, a South Dakota Republican, said earlier this week that the Justice Department “has already released tons of files” on Epstein. “I trust them in terms of having the confidence that they’ll get as much information out there as possible in a way that protects the rights of the victims,” he added.
Click to expand...

www.fox13now.com

Senate Republicans barely defeat effort by Democrats to force release of Epstein files

Senate Republicans defeated an effort Wednesday by Democrats to insert language into Congress’ annual defense authorization bill that would have forced the public release of Epstein files
www.fox13now.com www.fox13now.com
 
HitTheNailOnTheHead said:
The deciding vote was Susan Collins. What they were voting on was a Schumer amendment and she gave her reasons for voting his amendment down.



www.fox13now.com

Senate Republicans barely defeat effort by Democrats to force release of Epstein files

Senate Republicans defeated an effort Wednesday by Democrats to insert language into Congress’ annual defense authorization bill that would have forced the public release of Epstein files
www.fox13now.com www.fox13now.com
Click to expand...

There was 50 other Republicans voting with Susan Collins.
 
T2B_ said:
Wow really? I thought even around here you'd be unlikely to see someone defend that POS, but here we are...
Click to expand...

He's referring to a comment in March I made when they landed in Florida (shortly after Bourbons accused Tate of being a sex trafficking, rapist and claimed Trump leaned on Romania to release them) I said - I'm no fan of the Tate bros and their webcam business model but they were held for years on a case that fell apart because it lacked evidence. The Romanians haven't convicted them of rape and sex trafficking so as US citizens they should be allowed to return.
 
Last edited:

Remove this Banner Ad

HitTheNailOnTheHead said:
The deciding vote was Susan Collins. What they were voting on was a Schumer amendment and she gave her reasons for voting his amendment down.



www.fox13now.com

Senate Republicans barely defeat effort by Democrats to force release of Epstein files

Senate Republicans defeated an effort Wednesday by Democrats to insert language into Congress’ annual defense authorization bill that would have forced the public release of Epstein files
www.fox13now.com www.fox13now.com
Click to expand...
fknlol - her reasons make no sense if she is ok with the files being released.

If she is ok with releasing the files, and also wanted to pass the bipartisan Department of Defense policy bill, then she would vote to approve. But she and the other 50 republicans voted to continue to protect sex predators. Kudos to the 2 Republicans that voted for.

Your argument is they only wanted to approve the bipartisan Department of Defense policy - and were forced to vote against the bill due to the inclusion of also releasing the Epstein Files. You are literally confirming what we are saying - 51 Republicans voted against releasing the Epstein Files.

Of course, the reason the Democrats tried this is because Speaker Johnson literally shutdown congress early to avoid a vote on the standalone issue of releasing the files. They tried to get a vote in congress on just the files themselves - it was unprecedented what the Republicans did to avoid that vote. So don't try to tell us they voted against due to some administrative issue.

You can argue the Dems did nothing about releasing the files when they were in power, and you'd be right. You could also argue they were able to sit on their hands as the Republicans did not push for the files release or try to wedge the dems on that issue (but you won't because that truth is not convenient). But what you cannot seriously try to argue is that the Republicans are not trying to do all they can to prevent the files being released now.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

EasternTiger said:
Of course, when civil war breaks it will be nigh on impossible to hold elections.

Shame.
Click to expand...
True, you can't really hold a safe and credible election if war is raging in areas of your country. It's why criticism of Ukraine, for example, is ridiculous.

Let's hope the Trump administration doesn't start one or use false pretext to avoid being answerable to the people.
 
Last edited:
EasternTiger said:
Of course, when civil war breaks it will be nigh on impossible to hold elections.

Shame.
Click to expand...
Yes, that is what the Trump regime is hoping for
 
The left will have no one else to blame if they start a civil war, which looks more and more likely.

Antifa will be waging war on the citizens.

Lefties remind us Russian bots will be interfering in proceedings and imaginary white supremacists will be stalking the polling booths like modern day Techno Vikings.

I guess Trump will have to push on for another term and we look forward to 2032.

Thank you and let us pray for peace.
 
Bloods86 said:
True, you can't really hold a safe and credible election if war is raging in areas of your country. It's why criticism of Ukraine, for example, is ridiculous.

Let's hope the Trump administration doesn't start one or use false pretext to avoid being answerable to the people.
Click to expand...
Isn't the USA currently at war? Why did they bomb that boat full of people??
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Similar threads

HitTheNailOnTheHead
    • Like
Conspiracy Theory Australian Politics
4 5 6 7 8
Replies
184
Views
6K
HitTheNailOnTheHead
HitTheNailOnTheHead
HitTheNailOnTheHead
    • Like
Conspiracy Theory You have more chance of winning US lotto than drowning and yet the Obama and the Clinton chefs have both apparently drowned. What is going on?
Replies
14
Views
2K
Del80659
D

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom