Remove this Banner Ad

Current 4yo Boy Missing Yunta SA * Police Declare a Major Crime

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kurve
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

The other thing that is interesting is the drone footage, where it is noted as specifically showing "one human".

According to the stories, there should have been 2 together tending the sheep.

It seems someone's story is slowly coming apart.

Also interesting that 2 have lawyered up, and whilst one lawyer has said they're still cooperating the other has allegedly ceased doing the same.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

im struggling to think of a scenario where josie is the sole suspect. anyone? if josie is the suspect, they would all be implicated.

if there really is a sole suspect, then shannon makes all the sense in the world, but her lawyer says theyve been cooperating, while josies lawyer would not comment.
 
im struggling to think of a scenario where josie is the sole suspect. anyone? if josie is the suspect, they would all be implicated.

if there really is a sole suspect, then shannon makes all the sense in the world, but her lawyer says theyve been cooperating, while josies lawyer would not comment.

Got to admit I'm struggling with the same.

One seems to make sense, the other seems to have anger issues.

But one would implicate others as you said, whereas the police have said they only have one clear suspect, so.......🤔
 
im struggling to think of a scenario where josie is the sole suspect. anyone? if josie is the suspect, they would all be implicated.

if there really is a sole suspect, then shannon makes all the sense in the world, but her lawyer says theyve been cooperating, while josies lawyer would not comment.

Josie can be the sole suspect for whatever caused Gus' death.

That doesn't mean Shannon can't be implicated as an accessory after the fact.

This would require Jess to have left earlier to tend to the farming duties. Then something happens, caused by Josie. Josie says to Shannon, "we will lose the farm if we don't come up with a good story". So they concoct the abduction scenario.

The body is hidden and Josie rides off on the motorbike to join Jess. Jess has absolutely no idea anything has happened at this point.

The statements have been found to not match. Josie would have said she was with Jess the whole time (or at least longer than she actually was). Jess would have stated the truer version of the timeline. The discrepancy has caught the Granny's out IMO (ironically on AFL Granny day).
 
Last edited:
The other thing that is interesting is the drone footage, where it is noted as specifically showing "one human".

According to the stories, there should have been 2 together tending the sheep.

Just had a thought.....what if 1 of the 2 tending the sheep excused themselves from that task for a period of time with an explanation that they had to be elsewhere and would then return?

EDIT: your post above makes better sense
 
Josie can be the sole suspect for whatever caused Gus' death.

That doesn't mean Shannon can't be implicated as an accessory after the fact.

This would require Jess to have left earlier to tend to the farming duties. Then something happens, caused by Josie. Josie says to Shannon, "we will lose the farm if we don't come up with a good story". So they concoct the abduction scenario.

The body is hidden and Josie rides off on the motorbike to join Jess. This explains the drone footage only showing "one human". Jess has absolutely no idea anything has happened at this point.

The statements have been found to not match. Josie would have said she was with Jess the whole time (or at least longer than she actually was). Jess would have stated the truer version of the timeline. The discrepancy, combined with "one human" in the footage, has caught the Granny's out IMO (ironically on AFL Granny day).

Very good explanation
 

Remove this Banner Ad

very deliberate wording there.

so josie is the suspect? seemed like she had a pretty rock solid alibi, working with the mother 10km away.

not sure what to make of this.
It's only rock solid if the offered narrative and timeline is accepted as truth.
 
Josie can be the sole suspect for whatever caused Gus' death.

That doesn't mean Shannon can't be implicated as an accessory after the fact.

This would require Jess to have left earlier to tend to the farming duties. Then something happens, caused by Josie. Josie says to Shannon, "we will lose the farm if we don't come up with a good story". So they concoct the abduction scenario.

The body is hidden and Josie rides off on the motorbike to join Jess. Jess has absolutely no idea anything has happened at this point.

The statements have been found to not match. Josie would have said she was with Jess the whole time (or at least longer than she actually was). Jess would have stated the truer version of the timeline. The discrepancy has caught the Granny's out IMO (ironically on AFL Granny day).
“Lose the farm?”

I think avoiding going to prison would be a much higher priority than losing the farm.
 
“Lose the farm?”

I think avoiding going to prison would be a much higher priority than losing the farm.

Obviously, but Shannon at that point wasn't going to prison. However she would have struggled to keep the farm if Josie was locked up. Josie would have been trying to coerce Shannon into aiding and abetting, by suggesting what she (Shannon) stood to lose.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Obviously, but Shannon at that point wasn't going to prison. However she would have struggled to keep the farm if Josie was locked up. Josie would have been trying to coerce Shannon into aiding and abetting, by suggesting what she (Shannon) stood to lose.
Looks like you have it all worked out then 🙄
 
Josie can be the sole suspect for whatever caused Gus' death.

That doesn't mean Shannon can't be implicated as an accessory after the fact.

This would require Jess to have left earlier to tend to the farming duties. Then something happens, caused by Josie. Josie says to Shannon, "we will lose the farm if we don't come up with a good story". So they concoct the abduction scenario.

The body is hidden and Josie rides off on the motorbike to join Jess. Jess has absolutely no idea anything has happened at this point.

The statements have been found to not match. Josie would have said she was with Jess the whole time (or at least longer than she actually was). Jess would have stated the truer version of the timeline. The discrepancy has caught the Granny's out IMO (ironically on AFL Granny day).
This scenario reflects that Jess initially lied and has now changed her statement. Otherwise the police would surely have been onto the discrepancies of the time line earlier. IMOO I would have thought, in such a situated, if you were asked to not tell the truth in any small way, would you not be suspicious??
Maybe one of the Grandparents have cracked under the pressure?
Theres the possibility that something happened to Gus before Jess and Josie headed off to work and Shannon was involved either by herself or with Josies knowledge.
OR Jess and Josie came home earlier than stated, something happened without Jess's knowledge and that is why it took so long to report him missing.
 
This scenario reflects that Jess initially lied and has now changed her statement. Otherwise the police would surely have been onto the discrepancies of the time line earlier. IMOO I would have thought, in such a situated, if you were asked to not tell the truth in any small way, would you not be suspicious??

Agree that someone's statement must have varied (from the original) around mid-January, when they were re-interviewed. Also agree that Jess should have been suspicious if she was asked to not be 100% honest initially.
The police are not initially thinking foul play, so maybe not overly concerned about the statements not completely aligning. Jess would have been stressed to bits and maybe didn't take full care with her original statement. Or, Josie was caught out by something one of the others said, and amended her statement in a way that rang alarm bells with detectives?

Maybe one of the Grandparents have cracked under the pressure?

Very likely.

Theres the possibility that something happened to Gus before Jess and Josie headed off to work and Shannon was involved either by herself or with Josies knowledge.

The media reports have given a few hints that a "he" was involved. I think Shannon is more likely to fit the previous point.

OR Jess and Josie came home earlier than stated, something happened without Jess's knowledge and that is why it took so long to report him missing.

Anything's possible, but how would Jess not notice someone go missing to dispose of the body?
 
Agree that someone's statement must have varied (from the original) around mid-January, when they were re-interviewed. Also agree that Jess should have been suspicious if she was asked to not be 100% honest initially.
The police are not initially thinking foul play, so maybe not overly concerned about the statements not completely aligning. Jess would have been stressed to bits and maybe didn't take full care with her original statement. Or, Josie was caught out by something one of the others said, and amended her statement in a way that rang alarm bells with detectives?



Very likely.



The media reports have given a few hints that a "he" was involved. I think Shannon is more likely to fit the previous point.



Anything's possible, but how would Jess not notice someone go missing to dispose of the body?
They could have gone searching in different directions, none the wise of what each was actually doing.
 
im struggling to think of a scenario where josie is the sole suspect. anyone? if josie is the suspect, they would all be implicated.

if there really is a sole suspect, then shannon makes all the sense in the world, but her lawyer says theyve been cooperating, while josies lawyer would not comment.
An accident, as I've said from the beginning.
SAPOL took a car and bike, its likely that whichever one their suspect was controlling hit him upon returning to the homestead.
All 3 may be complicit in the subsequent cover up but only 1 is the perpetrator of the crime of causing death.

Id say he was out playing, he heard them coming back, ran out, they didnt see him, he was run over and critically injured and rather than risk losing the younger sibling to the Father who already feared his kids being there, buried him somewhere of significance and made up a story about him wandering off.

He'll be somewhere within 45 minutes of the hs.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom