- Joined
- Dec 11, 2009
- Posts
- 36,107
- Reaction score
- 48,857
- AFL Club
- Geelong
They said that about Williams foster family
True, but the police seem to be more competent in this case.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

BigFooty Tipping Notice Img
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Opening Round
The Golden Ticket - Official AFL on-seller of MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
They said that about Williams foster family
AhahahahTrue, but the police seem to be more competent in this case.
Ahahahah
The other thing that is interesting is the drone footage, where it is noted as specifically showing "one human".
According to the stories, there should have been 2 together tending the sheep.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
im struggling to think of a scenario where josie is the sole suspect. anyone? if josie is the suspect, they would all be implicated.
if there really is a sole suspect, then shannon makes all the sense in the world, but her lawyer says theyve been cooperating, while josies lawyer would not comment.

im struggling to think of a scenario where josie is the sole suspect. anyone? if josie is the suspect, they would all be implicated.
if there really is a sole suspect, then shannon makes all the sense in the world, but her lawyer says theyve been cooperating, while josies lawyer would not comment.
The other thing that is interesting is the drone footage, where it is noted as specifically showing "one human".
According to the stories, there should have been 2 together tending the sheep.
Josie can be the sole suspect for whatever caused Gus' death.
That doesn't mean Shannon can't be implicated as an accessory after the fact.
This would require Jess to have left earlier to tend to the farming duties. Then something happens, caused by Josie. Josie says to Shannon, "we will lose the farm if we don't come up with a good story". So they concoct the abduction scenario.
The body is hidden and Josie rides off on the motorbike to join Jess. This explains the drone footage only showing "one human". Jess has absolutely no idea anything has happened at this point.
The statements have been found to not match. Josie would have said she was with Jess the whole time (or at least longer than she actually was). Jess would have stated the truer version of the timeline. The discrepancy, combined with "one human" in the footage, has caught the Granny's out IMO (ironically on AFL Granny day).
Hard to believe any of themTh
That was their original story, doesn’t mean it’s true.
Oh and there was inconsistencies in the statements made to police by the family members. Fancy that hey, a grandparent lying![]()
Good poin
Poor little Gus.Good point. Still, it is one or both of them.
t. Still, it is one or both of them.
It's only rock solid if the offered narrative and timeline is accepted as truth.very deliberate wording there.
so josie is the suspect? seemed like she had a pretty rock solid alibi, working with the mother 10km away.
not sure what to make of this.
“Lose the farm?”Josie can be the sole suspect for whatever caused Gus' death.
That doesn't mean Shannon can't be implicated as an accessory after the fact.
This would require Jess to have left earlier to tend to the farming duties. Then something happens, caused by Josie. Josie says to Shannon, "we will lose the farm if we don't come up with a good story". So they concoct the abduction scenario.
The body is hidden and Josie rides off on the motorbike to join Jess. Jess has absolutely no idea anything has happened at this point.
The statements have been found to not match. Josie would have said she was with Jess the whole time (or at least longer than she actually was). Jess would have stated the truer version of the timeline. The discrepancy has caught the Granny's out IMO (ironically on AFL Granny day).
Seems to be changeable, police had formerly ruled out all three for the last 4 months. ?Still fishingHaven’t the police ruled the parents out?
You’d think they’d have to be pretty sure to do that already.
and two separate lawyer companies, wonder where everyone is staying these days?It seems someone's story is slowly coming apart.
Also interesting that 2 have lawyered up, and whilst one lawyer has said they're still cooperating the other has allegedly ceased doing the same.
“Lose the farm?”
I think avoiding going to prison would be a much higher priority than losing the farm.
Looks like you have it all worked out thenObviously, but Shannon at that point wasn't going to prison. However she would have struggled to keep the farm if Josie was locked up. Josie would have been trying to coerce Shannon into aiding and abetting, by suggesting what she (Shannon) stood to lose.

if no trace is ever found in this case, your can't help think but about that case...They said that about Williams foster family
This scenario reflects that Jess initially lied and has now changed her statement. Otherwise the police would surely have been onto the discrepancies of the time line earlier. IMOO I would have thought, in such a situated, if you were asked to not tell the truth in any small way, would you not be suspicious??Josie can be the sole suspect for whatever caused Gus' death.
That doesn't mean Shannon can't be implicated as an accessory after the fact.
This would require Jess to have left earlier to tend to the farming duties. Then something happens, caused by Josie. Josie says to Shannon, "we will lose the farm if we don't come up with a good story". So they concoct the abduction scenario.
The body is hidden and Josie rides off on the motorbike to join Jess. Jess has absolutely no idea anything has happened at this point.
The statements have been found to not match. Josie would have said she was with Jess the whole time (or at least longer than she actually was). Jess would have stated the truer version of the timeline. The discrepancy has caught the Granny's out IMO (ironically on AFL Granny day).
This scenario reflects that Jess initially lied and has now changed her statement. Otherwise the police would surely have been onto the discrepancies of the time line earlier. IMOO I would have thought, in such a situated, if you were asked to not tell the truth in any small way, would you not be suspicious??
Maybe one of the Grandparents have cracked under the pressure?
Theres the possibility that something happened to Gus before Jess and Josie headed off to work and Shannon was involved either by herself or with Josies knowledge.
OR Jess and Josie came home earlier than stated, something happened without Jess's knowledge and that is why it took so long to report him missing.
They could have gone searching in different directions, none the wise of what each was actually doing.Agree that someone's statement must have varied (from the original) around mid-January, when they were re-interviewed. Also agree that Jess should have been suspicious if she was asked to not be 100% honest initially.
The police are not initially thinking foul play, so maybe not overly concerned about the statements not completely aligning. Jess would have been stressed to bits and maybe didn't take full care with her original statement. Or, Josie was caught out by something one of the others said, and amended her statement in a way that rang alarm bells with detectives?
Very likely.
The media reports have given a few hints that a "he" was involved. I think Shannon is more likely to fit the previous point.
Anything's possible, but how would Jess not notice someone go missing to dispose of the body?
An accident, as I've said from the beginning.im struggling to think of a scenario where josie is the sole suspect. anyone? if josie is the suspect, they would all be implicated.
if there really is a sole suspect, then shannon makes all the sense in the world, but her lawyer says theyve been cooperating, while josies lawyer would not comment.